Iran - Azadegan LeagueData updated noong July 23, 2026

Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr: match stats

Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Pars Jam Bushehr crest
Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr sa Azadegan League (Iran). Naka-schedule ang match sa 9 June 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sanat Naft: 3-2-0 sa last five matches at 2.20 points per match. Pars Jam Bushehr: 4-1-0 at 2.60 points per match.

Goal statistics

Sanat Naft scores 1.09 at concedes 0.62 goals per match. Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.29 at concedes 0.65. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sanat Naft 38%, Pars Jam Bushehr 38%. Over 2.5: Sanat Naft 26%, Pars Jam Bushehr 32%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots at playing style

Sanat Naft ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.09 vs 0.93. Sanat Naft averages 3.7 shots per match, habang Pars Jam Bushehr ay 0.6.

First at second half

Sanat Naft leads at half-time sa 12% ng matches at scores 0.76 goals after the break. Pars Jam Bushehr: 38% at 0.71.

Goals by minute

Sanat Naft: 46-60 (9 goals). Pars Jam Bushehr: 16-30 (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30% at Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 3.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Sanat Naft may clear home advantage: nananalo ng 64% ng home matches, positive goal difference na +13 sa home games at nakakakuha lang ng 0.5 goals conceded per game with 50% clean sheets. Offensively, hosts average 1.43 goals per home game with xG 1.13 at 9.63 shots, kumpara sa Pars Jam na on the road averages 1.15 goals with xG 0.96 at only 5.67 shots. Pars Jam is more efficient per shot (18% conversion vs 14% Sanat Naft) at nagre-record ng 4 on-target shots per away game kumpara sa 2.88 on-target ng hosts, so with limited chances they can be dangerous. Parehong teams have similar recent form — 1 point per game over last five, Sanat Naft scored 1 goal in last 5 matches while Pars Jam 2 goals, indicating a temporary dip in finishing for both. Considering better chance creation by the hosts (xG 1.13 vs 0.96), higher possession control (54% vs 49%) and near-flawless home defense, my tip is a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
6Shots5
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0Shots on target2
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.65xG0.59
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3Corners1
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
38Dangerous attacks19
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
13Fouls15
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0Cards0
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.09Goals scored / match1.29
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.62Goals conceded / match0.65
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
24%Average possession11%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.94Shots on target / match0.12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.68Shots per match0.56
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.94Shots on target0.12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
29.6%Shot conversion231.6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
24%Possession11%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.09xG for0.93
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.84xG against1.06
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Shooting quality

Sanat Naft: Counter-attackingPars Jam Bushehr: Counter-attacking
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
Accuracy (shots on target)26%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.301.66
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.1610.75

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 18% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 2.6 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-6-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pars Jam Bushehr
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 1.29 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.62 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 0.65 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Scoring profile ng Sanat Naft: mixed

Sanat Naft scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).

Scoring profile ng Pars Jam Bushehr: malakas

Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

37Goals scored (season)44
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
21Goals conceded (season)22
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.71Average goals in match1.94
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
8Goals scored (last 5)12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal74%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
29%2 goals38%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
9%3 goals9%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
6%4 goals6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal50%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
9%2 goals15%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Pars Jam Bushehr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
18%Scored in both halves24%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
40%BTTS - last 540%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1.59 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft - half-time state
12% leading74% draw15% trailing
Pars Jam Bushehr - half-time state
38% leading44% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.59
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.68Average goals (1st half)0.82
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
68%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
74%No goal before half-time56%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.26Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
74%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
44%No goal after half-time50%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft - second-half results

47% W44% R9% P
37
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding392%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results

35% W50% R15% P
54
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Pars Jam Bushehr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
9
3
46-60
8
6
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Pars Jam Bushehr
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
9
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
9
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Pars Jam Bushehr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
187%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Sanat NaftLigaPars Jam Bushehr
Average goals in match 1.711.59 1.94
Both teams scored 38%30% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%22% 32%
Clean sheets 47%46% 50%
Goal before half-time 41%46% 62%
Goal after half-time 65%57% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sanat Naft 1 - 0 - 0 Pars Jam Bushehr. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Pars Jam Bushehr
1 : 2
Sanat Naft

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Natapos ang Azadegan League match sa score na Sanat Naft 0:2 Pars Jam Bushehr. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Sanat Naft scores 1.09 goals per match at Pars Jam Bushehr 1.29. Ang Azadegan League average ay 1.59 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 22% ng matches. BTTS: Sanat Naft 38%, Pars Jam Bushehr 38%.

Ano ang current form ng Sanat Naft at Pars Jam Bushehr?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Sanat Naft ay 3-2-0 (2.20 points per match), habang ang Pars Jam Bushehr ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.