Timog Korea - K League 1Data updated noong July 23, 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: match stats

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Anyang crest
Anyang

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang sa K League 1 (Timog Korea). Naka-schedule ang match sa 12 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2 sa last five matches at 0.60 points per match. Anyang: 3-1-1 at 2.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 at concedes 1.37 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.37 at concedes 1.16. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Anyang 74%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Anyang 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots at playing style

Sangju Sangmu ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.48 vs 1.27. Sangju Sangmu averages 12.4 shots per match, habang Anyang ay 9.7.

First at second half

Sangju Sangmu leads at half-time sa 21% ng matches at scores 0.58 goals after the break. Anyang: 26% at 0.79.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51% at Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Sa 4 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-1-1. Average goals: 3.50, BTTS: 75%.

Match description

Tip ko ay draw. Sangju Sangmu at home may 0% wins at 100% draws (0 wins, 5 draws), nag-a-score ng average 1.0 goals per home match with 12.33 shots and 4 on target at average at xG 1.5, while conceding average 1.0 goals (xG against 1.26). Anyang away din walang wins (0% wins) at nagtala ng 67% draws, may average 8.67 shots and 4.33 on target per match with xG 1.22, pero higher shot conversion 12% vs 8% ng home side. Defensively Anyang gives up more quality chances (avg xG against 1.80 and 1.33 goals conceded away), habang hosts have clearer ball control (51% possession vs 38%) at higher volume of attempts. Given higher xG and more shots for the hosts and very high draw rates for both teams, pinaka-likely outcome is a point split (60% draw, 25% Sangju win, 15% Anyang win).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
Sangju SangmuAnyang
19Shots14
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Shots on target3
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.22xG1.4
Sangju SangmuAnyang
12Corners5
Sangju SangmuAnyang
83Dangerous attacks43
Sangju SangmuAnyang
10Fouls6
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3Cards2
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.95Goals scored / match1.37
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.37Goals conceded / match1.16
Sangju SangmuAnyang
57%Average possession43%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.53Shots on target / match3.95
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.37Shots per match9.74
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.53Shots on target3.95
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7.7%Shot conversion14.1%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
57%Possession43%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.48xG for1.27
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.35xG against1.72
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedAnyang: Counter-attacking
Sangju SangmuAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)29%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Anyang is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 2 pts / match - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Anyang
WLWDW
Season result split
32% W47% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-4
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.37 goals / match - Anyang

Anyang is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.16 goals / match - Anyang

Scoring profile ng Sangju Sangmu: napakalakas

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Scoring profile ng Anyang: napakalakas

Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)26
Sangju SangmuAnyang
26Goals conceded (season)22
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.32Average goals in match2.53
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
16%2 goals32%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
5%3 goals11%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%2 goals26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%3 goals5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
5%BTTS in both halves11%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Scored in both halves26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.47 pts / match - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
26% leading68% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.47
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.84
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
63%No goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.68
Sangju SangmuAnyang
32%Clean sheet after half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%No goal after half-time37%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Anyang - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Anyang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaAnyang
Average goals in match 2.322.31 2.53
Both teams scored 68%51% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 37%
Clean sheets 11%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 1 - 1 Anyang. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% mga match.

Anyang
2 : 2
Sangju Sangmu
FC Anyang
4 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
1 : 3
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Natapos ang K League 1 match sa score na Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Anyang. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Sangju Sangmu at Anyang?

Sa huling 4 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Sangju Sangmu ng 2, ang Anyang ng 1, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 3.50; BTTS: 75%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 goals per match at Anyang 1.37. Ang K League 1 average ay 2.31 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 39% ng matches. BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Anyang 74%.

Ano ang current form ng Sangju Sangmu at Anyang?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Sangju Sangmu ay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per match), habang ang Anyang ay 3-1-1 (2.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.