Super Nova vs Liepāja: match stats
Super Nova vs Liepāja: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Super Nova vs Liepāja sa Virsliga (Latvia). Naka-schedule ang match sa 23 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Super Nova: 2-0-3 sa last five matches at 1.20 points per match. Liepāja: 1-0-4 at 0.60 points per match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova scores 1.09 at concedes 1.52 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.27 at concedes 1.55. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova 61%, Liepāja 55%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 57%, Liepāja 59%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots at playing style
Liepāja ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.50 vs 1.19. Super Nova averages 9.0 shots per match, habang Liepāja ay 12.4.
First at second half
Super Nova leads at half-time sa 17% ng matches at scores 0.52 goals after the break. Liepāja: 36% at 0.68.
Goals by minute
Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Sa 5 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-1-2. Average goals: 3.40, BTTS: 60%.
Match description
Mga advantage ng Liepāja malinaw sa quality ng chances at game control: away xG 1.67 kontra home xG ng Super Nova 1.26, at mga guests nag-aaverage ng 14.33 shots per match with 4.33 on target vs 10.5 shots at 4 on target para sa Super Nova. Defensively mas maganda rin si Liepāja — conceding 1.33 goals away avg at xG against 1.24, habang ang Super Nova sa home conceding 2.5 goals per match at xG against 1.85 at 0% clean sheets. Short-term form naman pabor sa hosts na nanalo ng 3 sa last 5 matches at sa period na iyon scored 6 goals at conceded 8, nagpapakita ng offensive potential pero defensive instability. Guests have lower shot conversion (approx. 7% vs 10% ng hosts), na nililimit ang kanilang advantage, pero possession edge 65% vs 39% at better xG pabor sa kanila. Kaya forecast ko win para sa Liepāja, with moderate draw risk dahil sa weak defense ng Super Nova.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Super Nova · 0.6 pts / match - Liepāja
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Liepāja is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.09 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.27 goals / match - Liepāja
Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Super Nova
Over / Under — Liepāja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Liepāja is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.23 pts / match - Liepāja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Super Nova
Liepāja
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova | Liga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.61 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 56% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 75% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Super Nova 2 - 1 - 2 Liepāja. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 60% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Super Nova vs Liepāja?
Natapos ang Virsliga match sa score na Super Nova 1:2 Liepāja. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang head-to-head record ng Super Nova at Liepāja?
Sa huling 5 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Super Nova ng 2, ang Liepāja ng 2, at 1 ang draws. Average goals: 3.40; BTTS: 60%.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Super Nova vs Liepāja?
Super Nova scores 1.09 goals per match at Liepāja 1.27. Ang Virsliga average ay 2.98 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Super Nova 61%, Liepāja 55%.
Ano ang current form ng Super Nova at Liepāja?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Super Nova ay 2-0-3 (1.20 points per match), habang ang Liepāja ay 1-0-4 (0.60 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Super Nova vs Liepāja?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.