Utrecht vs NAC Breda: match stats
Utrecht vs NAC Breda: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Utrecht vs NAC Breda sa Eredivisie (Netherlands). Naka-schedule ang match sa 2 May 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Utrecht: 4-1-0 sa last five matches at 2.60 points per match. NAC Breda: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.
Goal statistics
Utrecht scores 1.64 at concedes 1.25 goals per match. NAC Breda scores 1.03 at concedes 1.71. League average: 3.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Utrecht 61%, NAC Breda 47%. Over 2.5: Utrecht 50%, NAC Breda 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots at playing style
Utrecht ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.65 vs 1.52. Utrecht averages 15.3 shots per match, habang NAC Breda ay 14.1.
First at second half
Utrecht leads at half-time sa 42% ng matches at scores 1.00 goals after the break. NAC Breda: 21% at 0.62.
Goals by minute
Utrecht: 76-90+ (14 goals). NAC Breda: 76-90+ (10 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Eredivisie: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 63% at Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.
Match description
May clear statistical edge ang Utrecht kaya bet ko is home win. Sa home, Utrecht averages 1.8 goals per match at win rate na 53% home matches, while NAC Breda on the road only averages 0.8 goals at just 7% wins. Defensively mas malaki pa ang gap — NAC concedes 2.0 goals away on average, Utrecht only 0.87 at home, resulting in goal difference na +14 for Utrecht sa kanilang stadium vs -18 for NAC away. Plus, Utrecht generates average xG 1.7 at home with 5.53 shots on target at 11% conversion, samantalang NAC has xG 1.42, 3.73 shots on target and 6% conversion, and sa last 5 matches scored only 2 goals and went winless (0-2-3, 0.4 points per match). Considering advantage sa efficiency (1.8 vs 0.8), defense (0.87 vs 2.0), xG (1.7 vs 1.42) and form, hosts look like clear favorites.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Utrecht | NAC Breda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Utrecht is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Utrecht · 1 pts / match - NAC Breda
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht is 59% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - Utrecht · 1.03 goals / match - NAC Breda
Utrecht is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Utrecht · 1.71 goals / match - NAC Breda
Utrecht scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while NAC Breda keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).
NAC Breda scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Utrecht keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Utrecht
Over / Under — NAC Breda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Utrecht is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Utrecht · 0.94 pts / match - NAC Breda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Utrecht - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
NAC Breda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 18%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Utrecht
NAC Breda
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Utrecht | Liga | NAC Breda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.89 | 3.17 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 63% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 20% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 84% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Utrecht 0 - 1 - 0 NAC Breda. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Utrecht vs NAC Breda?
Natapos ang Eredivisie match sa score na Utrecht 2:0 NAC Breda. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Utrecht vs NAC Breda?
Utrecht scores 1.64 goals per match at NAC Breda 1.03. Ang Eredivisie average ay 3.17 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 61% ng matches. BTTS: Utrecht 61%, NAC Breda 47%.
Ano ang current form ng Utrecht at NAC Breda?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Utrecht ay 4-1-0 (2.60 points per match), habang ang NAC Breda ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Utrecht vs NAC Breda?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.