Varzim vs CD Mafra: match stats
Varzim vs CD Mafra: form, goals at mahahalagang stats
Mahahalagang detalye ng match
Varzim vs CD Mafra sa Liga 3 (Portugal). Naka-schedule ang match sa 11 April 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Varzim: 1-2-2 sa last five matches at 1.00 points per match. CD Mafra: 2-1-2 at 1.40 points per match.
Goal statistics
Varzim scores 1.22 at concedes 1.13 goals per match. CD Mafra scores 1.41 at concedes 1.34. League average: 2.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Varzim 47%, CD Mafra 63%. Over 2.5: Varzim 44%, CD Mafra 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots at playing style
CD Mafra ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.41 vs 1.28. Varzim averages 9.8 shots per match, habang CD Mafra ay 10.3.
First at second half
Varzim leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.63 goals after the break. CD Mafra: 34% at 0.81.
Goals by minute
Varzim: 76-90+ (12 goals). CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.
League context
Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.
Match description
Bet ko sa home win kasi Varzim ang mas solid defensively sa home: average 0.69 goals conceded per match kumpara sa 1.62 conceded by CD Mafra on the road. Sa attack Varzim din ang better — 1.54 goals per home game with xG 1.45 at 4.69 shots on target, habang Mafra has 1.15 goals away, xG 1.36 at 3.77 SoT, nagpapakita ng higher efficiency ng Varzim sa creating at finishing chances. Plus, Varzim has 38% clean sheets sa home at 54% home wins, samantalang Mafra only 8% clean sheets at 23% away wins; guests mayroon ding negative away goal difference (-6). Pareho silang in poor form — last five matches pareho average 0.6 points per game; Varzim scored 3 at conceded 8, Mafra scored 5 at conceded 12, pinapakita bigger defensive issues ng guests. Considering defensive edge at better efficiency with similar xG, I rate Varzim win 60%, draw 25%, Mafra win 15%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Varzim | CD Mafra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CD Mafra is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Varzim · 1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra
Goals— paano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Mafra is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Varzim · 1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra
Varzim is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Varzim · 1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra
Varzim scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Varzim
Over / Under — CD Mafra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— saang half mas madalas silang maka-score?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Mafra is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Varzim · 1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Varzim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
CD Mafra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Karagdagang team indicators— ano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?
Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.
Match profile
Varzim
CD Mafra
* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| Varzim | Liga | CD Mafra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.34 | 2.23 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 49% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 40% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | • 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 66% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 74% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Varzim 0 - 0 - 1 CD Mafra. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.
Mga madalas itanong
Ano ang result ng Varzim vs CD Mafra?
Natapos ang Liga 3 match sa score na Varzim 0:2 CD Mafra. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.
Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Varzim vs CD Mafra?
Varzim scores 1.22 goals per match at CD Mafra 1.41. Ang Liga 3 average ay 2.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 40% ng matches. BTTS: Varzim 47%, CD Mafra 63%.
Ano ang current form ng Varzim at CD Mafra?
Sa last 5 matches, ang Varzim ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match), habang ang CD Mafra ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match).
Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Varzim vs CD Mafra?
Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.