Varzim vs CD Trofense: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Varzim vs CD Trofense sa Liga 3 (Portugal). Naka-schedule ang match sa 20 December 2025 at 18:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Varzim: 1-2-2 sa last five matches at 1.00 points per match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Varzim scores 1.22 at concedes 1.13 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 at concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Varzim 47%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: Varzim 44%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots at playing style

Varzim ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.28 vs 1.14. Varzim averages 9.8 shots per match, habang CD Trofense ay 7.7.

First at second half

Varzim leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.63 goals after the break. CD Trofense: 28% at 0.41.

Goals by minute

Varzim: 76-90+ (12 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Sa 3 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 2-0-1. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 33%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
VarzimCD Trofense
8Shots3
VarzimCD Trofense
1Shots on target2
VarzimCD Trofense
1.02xG0.51
VarzimCD Trofense
10Corners0
VarzimCD Trofense
61Dangerous attacks23
VarzimCD Trofense
18Fouls19
VarzimCD Trofense
5Cards4
VarzimCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match0.94
VarzimCD Trofense
1.13Goals conceded / match0.97
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Average possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
3.72Shots on target / match3.19
VarzimCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match7.72
VarzimCD Trofense
3.72Shots on target3.19
VarzimCD Trofense
12.4%Shot conversion12.1%
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
1.28xG for1.14
VarzimCD Trofense
1.33xG against1.26
VarzimCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Varzim: BalancedCD Trofense: Balanced
VarzimCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Varzim is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Varzim · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

Varzim
WDLLD
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Varzim is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Varzim · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Varzim · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

Scoring profile ng Varzim: malakas

Varzim scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Scoring profile ng CD Trofense: malakas

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

39Goals scored (season)30
VarzimCD Trofense
36Goals conceded (season)31
VarzimCD Trofense
2.34Average goals in match1.91
VarzimCD Trofense
6Goals scored (last 5)1
VarzimCD Trofense
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal56%
VarzimCD Trofense
41%2 goals22%
VarzimCD Trofense
13%3 goals6%
VarzimCD Trofense
3%4 goals6%
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
VarzimCD Trofense
28%2 goals19%
VarzimCD Trofense
9%3 goals3%
VarzimCD Trofense
0%4 goals0%
VarzimCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
VarzimCD Trofense
9%BTTS in both halves3%
VarzimCD Trofense
28%Scored in both halves16%
VarzimCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
VarzimCD Trofense
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
VarzimCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 520%
VarzimCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
VarzimCD Trofense
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
VarzimCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
VarzimCD Trofense

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
VarzimCD Trofense
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
VarzimCD Trofense
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
VarzimCD Trofense

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Varzim · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

Varzim - half-time state
28% leading41% draw31% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.31
VarzimCD Trofense
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
VarzimCD Trofense
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
VarzimCD Trofense
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.03
VarzimCD Trofense
53%Clean sheet before half-time56%
VarzimCD Trofense
59%No goal before half-time59%
VarzimCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.06
VarzimCD Trofense
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
VarzimCD Trofense
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
VarzimCD Trofense
1.19Average goals (2nd half)0.88
VarzimCD Trofense
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
VarzimCD Trofense
47%No goal after half-time69%
VarzimCD Trofense

Varzim - second-half results

28% W47% R25% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Varzim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
7
12
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

VarzimLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.342.23 1.91
Both teams scored 47%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%40% 31%
Clean sheets 25%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 78%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Varzim 2 - 0 - 1 CD Trofense. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Varzim vs CD Trofense?

Natapos ang Liga 3 match sa score na Varzim 0:1 CD Trofense. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang head-to-head record ng Varzim at CD Trofense?

Sa huling 3 head-to-head matches, nanalo ang Varzim ng 2, ang CD Trofense ng 1, at 0 ang draws. Average goals: 2.00; BTTS: 33%.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Varzim vs CD Trofense?

Varzim scores 1.22 goals per match at CD Trofense 0.94. Ang Liga 3 average ay 2.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 40% ng matches. BTTS: Varzim 47%, CD Trofense 47%.

Ano ang current form ng Varzim at CD Trofense?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Varzim ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match), habang ang CD Trofense ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Varzim vs CD Trofense?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.