Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace sa Premier League (England). Naka-schedule ang match sa 22 November 2025 at 16:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Wolverhampton Wanderers: 0-3-2 sa last five matches at 0.60 points per match. Crystal Palace: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.71 at concedes 1.79 goals per match. Crystal Palace scores 1.08 at concedes 1.34. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%, Crystal Palace 53%. Over 2.5: Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%, Crystal Palace 55%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots at playing style

Crystal Palace ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.31 vs 1.13. Wolverhampton Wanderers averages 9.7 shots per match, habang Crystal Palace ay 11.6.

First at second half

Wolverhampton Wanderers leads at half-time sa 8% ng matches at scores 0.37 goals after the break. Crystal Palace: 29% at 0.55.

Goals by minute

Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (7 goals). Crystal Palace: 31-45+ (12 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Premier League: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 56% at Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
8Shots10
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1Shots on target4
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.82xG1.25
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1Corners4
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
33Dangerous attacks47
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
13Fouls9
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
2Cards3
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.71Goals scored / match1.08
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1.79Goals conceded / match1.34
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
43%Average possession46%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
3.24Shots on target / match3.74
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.74Shots per match11.63
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
3.24Shots on target3.74
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
7.3%Shot conversion9.3%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
43%Possession46%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1.13xG for1.31
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1.63xG against1.4
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Shooting quality

Wolverhampton Wanderers: BalancedCrystal Palace: Balanced
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
Accuracy (shots on target)33%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wolverhampton Wanderers is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 0.4 pts / match - Crystal Palace

Wolverhampton Wanderers
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W29% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-11-24
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-11
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Crystal Palace
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W32% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-15
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Crystal Palace is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.08 goals / match - Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.34 goals / match - Crystal Palace

Scoring profile ng Wolverhampton Wanderers: mixed

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 50% of matches (19 of 38 matches), while Crystal Palace keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

Scoring profile ng Crystal Palace: napakalakas

Crystal Palace scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 38 matches).

27Goals scored (season)41
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
68Goals conceded (season)51
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
2.5Average goals in match2.42
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal68%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
18%2 goals32%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
3%3 goals8%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0%4 goals0%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal68%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
53%2 goals42%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
29%3 goals21%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
8%4 goals3%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Wolverhampton Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 38 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
3%BTTS in both halves5%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
5%Scored in both halves18%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
60%BTTS - last 560%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Crystal Palace is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.26 pts / match - Crystal Palace

Wolverhampton Wanderers - half-time state
8% leading45% draw47% trailing
Crystal Palace - half-time state
29% leading39% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.68Points per match (1st half)1.26
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.18
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
42%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
74%No goal before half-time55%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
39%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace
71%No goal after half-time58%
Wolverhampton WanderersCrystal Palace

Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results

21% W29% R50% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Crystal Palace - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
48
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wolverhampton Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Crystal Palace - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wolverhampton Wanderers
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
3
10
16-30
7
15
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Crystal Palace
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
0
16-30
12
21
31-45
2
8
46-60
8
6
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Crystal Palace

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Wolverhampton WanderersLigaCrystal Palace
Average goals in match 2.502.75 2.42
Both teams scored 45%56% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%55% 55%
Clean sheets 11%26% 32%
Goal before half-time 66%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 76%79% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wolverhampton Wanderers 0 - 0 - 1 Crystal Palace. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace?

Natapos ang Premier League match sa score na Wolverhampton Wanderers 0:2 Crystal Palace. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace?

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.71 goals per match at Crystal Palace 1.08. Ang Premier League average ay 2.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 55% ng matches. BTTS: Wolverhampton Wanderers 45%, Crystal Palace 53%.

Ano ang current form ng Wolverhampton Wanderers at Crystal Palace?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Wolverhampton Wanderers ay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per match), habang ang Crystal Palace ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Crystal Palace?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.