1860 München vs Ingolstadt: match statistics
1860 München vs Ingolstadt: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
1860 München played Ingolstadt in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
1860 München: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Ingolstadt: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
1860 München scores 1.47 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Ingolstadt scores 1.61 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.16 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: 1860 München 61%, Ingolstadt 72%. Over 2.5: 1860 München 56%, Ingolstadt 69%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Ingolstadt has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.40. 1860 München: 11.1 shots per match, Ingolstadt: 13.3.
Match halves
1860 München: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.89. Ingolstadt: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
1860 München: 76-90+ (17 goals). Ingolstadt: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back 1860 München to win (1) because the home side demonstrate stronger home form and superior defensive metrics. At home 1860 average 1.83 goals scored and 1.33 conceded with xG 1.55 per match versus xG against 1.49, yielding a small +0.06 xG differential and a positive home goal difference (+9). Ingolstadt away average 1.78 scored and 1.44 conceded, but register xG against 1.93 versus xG for 1.48—approximately -0.45 xG differential—and have shipped 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per game). Additionally, 1860 collected 6 points in their last 5 (1.2 avg) while Ingolstadt only 3 points (0.6 avg), and the visitors lose 39% of away games versus 1860’s 11% home loss rate. Despite similar attacking efficiency (conversion 15% and an average of 4.89 shots on target for the hosts vs 5.06 for the visitors), the defensive and away-form gap for Ingolstadt tips the balance toward a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor the “both teams to score” scenario with a 75% confidence due to strong BTTS signals: 1860 has 78% season BTTS rate, Ingolstadt 67%, and the league average is 64%. Both teams rarely keep a clean sheet (1860 17%, Ingolstadt 22%), and Ingolstadt conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Offensively 1860 generates xG 1.67 and scores 1.44 goals per game on the season (53 total), Ingolstadt has xG 1.48 and 1.78 goals per game (58 total); both teams register 5.17 and 5.06 shots on target with conversion rates of 10% vs 15%. Additionally, a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (67% and 72%) and a league average of 3.17 goals support an exchange of goals, and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of their games. In summary, considering 78% vs 67% BTTS, low clean sheets 17%/22% and high xG against (Ingolstadt 1.93, 1860 1.64), I pick 'BTTS - Yes' 75% vs 'No Goal' 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.80 for 1860 and 1.56 for Ingolstadt (total 3.36), calculated as the average of attack xG and opponent xG: (1.67+1.93)/2 = 1.80 and (1.48+1.64)/2 = 1.56. Seasonally both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: 78% for 1860 and 83% for Ingolstadt (avg 80.5%), and season over 2.5 rates of 67% and 72% respectively. In the last 5 matches over 2.5 is 60% for the home side and 80% for the away side, while BTTS occurs in 78% of 1860’s games and 67% of Ingolstadt’s, indicating mutual scoring ability (average goals 1.44 vs 1.78). As a result I estimate Over 1.5 at 88% (Under 12%), Over 2.5 at 72% (Under 28%) and Over 3.5 at 34% (Under 66%) – the total expected goals 3.36 is materially above the 2.5 threshold, but seasonal Over 3.5 rates (28% and 39%) limit the probability of a very high-scoring game. The strongest betting signal is Over 1.5, since 80.5% of season matches for both teams exceed that line and the projected 3.36 goals gives clear value on that market.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a draw at half-time with an away win at full-time (X/2). This season the home side have been drawing at the break in 61% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home=61.0), while in their last five games the away team averaged 1.4 goals before half-time (last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_away=1.4), indicating a high probability of a HT draw followed by an away turnaround. The away side score on average 1.78 goals per match versus 1.44 for the hosts (seasonScoredAVG_away=1.78 vs seasonScoredAVG_home=1.44) and have a higher shot conversion rate of 15% compared to 10% (shot_conversion_rate_away=15.0 vs shot_conversion_rate_home=10.0), so they convert chances into goals more often. Additionally, after the break the away team average 1.89 goals in the second half and earn 1.67 points in that period (AVG_2hg_away=1.89, ppg_2hg_away=1.67) and win second halves 50% of the time (wins_2hg_percentage_away=50.0); both teams score in 78% (home) and 67% (away) of matches, hence X/2 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| 1860 München | Ingolstadt | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
1860 München is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - 1860 München · 0.6 pts / match - Ingolstadt
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ingolstadt is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - 1860 München · 1.61 goals / match - Ingolstadt
1860 München is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - 1860 München · 1.5 goals / match - Ingolstadt
1860 München scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Ingolstadt keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).
Ingolstadt scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while 1860 München keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - 1860 München
Over / Under - Ingolstadt
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ingolstadt is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - 1860 München · 1.36 pts / match - Ingolstadt
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
1860 München - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ingolstadt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
1860 München
Ingolstadt
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| 1860 München | Liga | Ingolstadt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.81 | 3.16 | • 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 83% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: 1860 München 1 - 0 - 0 Ingolstadt. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of 1860 München vs Ingolstadt?
The 3. Liga match finished 1860 München 1:2 Ingolstadt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before 1860 München vs Ingolstadt?
1860 München score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ingolstadt 1.61. The 3. Liga average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 61% of 1860 München's matches and 72% of Ingolstadt's.
What form are 1860 München and Ingolstadt in?
Over the last 5 games 1860 München have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Ingolstadt 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 1860 München vs Ingolstadt?
The statistical background for 1860 München vs Ingolstadt — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


