1860 München vs Jahn Regensburg: match statistics
1860 München vs Jahn Regensburg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
1860 München played Jahn Regensburg in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
1860 München: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Jahn Regensburg: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
1860 München scores 1.47 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Jahn Regensburg scores 1.38 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.12 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: 1860 München 59%, Jahn Regensburg 47%. Over 2.5: 1860 München 56%, Jahn Regensburg 53%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Jahn Regensburg has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.38. 1860 München: 11.0 shots per match, Jahn Regensburg: 12.7.
Match halves
1860 München: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.88. Jahn Regensburg: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
1860 München: 76-90+ (14 goals). Jahn Regensburg: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.12 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): 1860 München win 50% of home matches, have a positive home goal difference of +8 and score 1.75 goals per game on average with 4.5 shots on target. Regensburg perform worse away — they win only 25% of away fixtures, have a -8 goal difference, concede 1.63 goals per away game on average and fail to score in 31% of away matches. The last five matches, however, raise a cautionary flag for the hosts: 1860 have scored only 3 goals and average 1.0 point per game, while Regensburg have scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per game. Chance quality is similar (average xG 1.51 for 1860 at home vs 1.59 for Regensburg away), but the hosts convert far better (15% shot conversion vs 8% for the visitors), which favors the home side. Considering the better conversion and more stable home defense (1.25 goals conceded at home vs 1.63 for the visitors), I give the edge to 1860, although a draw or an away win cannot be ruled out given the visitors’ form.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because league context and guests' form strongly indicate both teams scoring: league-wide BTTS rate is 64%, Jahn Regensburg has a seasonal BTTS of 56% and 60% in the last 5, increasing the likelihood the visitors will find the net. 1860 München’s seasonal BTTS is only 38% (40% in the last 5), but they average 1.63 goals seasonally with xG 1.49 and a shot conversion of 14%, so the hosts possess genuine attacking threat. Regensburg scored 8 goals in the last 5 (1.6 per match) with xG 1.59, while 1860’s defense concedes on average 1.44 xG per match, so the visitors also create scoring opportunities. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 38% of matches, whereas Regensburg has only 13% clean sheets; both teams seasonally both score (1860: 47 scored, Regensburg: 44) and concede (1860: 43 conceded, Regensburg: 48), which favors Goal/Goal. Summing these factors I assign 62% to 'yes' and 38% to 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive statistics, I estimate the home side will score about 1.60 goals (home attack xG 1.49 and away defense xG 1.71 → average 1.60), and the visitors about 1.52 goals (away attack xG 1.59 and home defense xG 1.44 → average 1.52), yielding a total of 3.12 goals. Seasonal percentages show a strong trend toward Over 1.5: 1860 has 88% of matches over 1.5, Regensburg 81%, and the league averages 3.12 goals per game, which strongly supports Over 1.5. The 2.5 line has moderate backing — 63% of 1860’s matches finish Over 2.5 versus 44% for Regensburg, and the projected xG=3.12 implies roughly a 60% chance of Over 2.5; however, the last 5 matches for both teams show only 40% Over 2.5, which reduces confidence. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: seasonal Over 3.5 rates are 31% for 1860 and 25% for Regensburg, and the expected 3.12 is below 3.5, so Under 3.5 has the edge. Therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (high 88%/81% and combined xG 3.12), while Over 2.5 remains a moderate-risk option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back HT/FT 2/1: the visitors may lead at the break, but the hosts will mount a turnaround and win. In the last five matches Regensburg led at half-time in 75% of games and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time, while 1860 recorded 0.0 first-half goals in those five. After the interval the home side averages 1.13 goals compared to 0.56 for the visitors and concedes 0.69 goals versus 1.06 conceded by Regensburg, which supports comebacks. This is corroborated by 1860’s superiority in second halves: an average of 1.56 points and a +7 goal balance compared with 0.88 points and a -8 balance for the visitors. Additionally, season-long metrics favor the hosts (1.69 points per home match vs 0.94 for Regensburg, 50% home win rate vs 25% for the away side) and better shot efficiency (conversion 14% vs 8%), therefore the 2/1 scenario is the most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| 1860 München | Jahn Regensburg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Jahn Regensburg is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - 1860 München · 1.4 pts / match - Jahn Regensburg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
1860 München is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - 1860 München · 1.38 goals / match - Jahn Regensburg
1860 München is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.34 goals / match - 1860 München · 1.5 goals / match - Jahn Regensburg
1860 München scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Jahn Regensburg keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).
Jahn Regensburg scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while 1860 München keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - 1860 München
Over / Under - Jahn Regensburg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jahn Regensburg is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - 1860 München · 1.31 pts / match - Jahn Regensburg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
1860 München - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Jahn Regensburg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
1860 München
Jahn Regensburg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| 1860 München | Liga | Jahn Regensburg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.81 | 3.12 | ▼ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 64% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 83% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: 1860 München 0 - 0 - 1 Jahn Regensburg. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of 1860 München vs Jahn Regensburg?
The 3. Liga match finished 1860 München 2:2 Jahn Regensburg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before 1860 München vs Jahn Regensburg?
1860 München score 1.47 goals per game on average and Jahn Regensburg 1.38. The 3. Liga average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 59% of 1860 München's matches and 47% of Jahn Regensburg's.
What form are 1860 München and Jahn Regensburg in?
Over the last 5 games 1860 München have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Jahn Regensburg 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 1860 München vs Jahn Regensburg?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


