22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre: match statistics
22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
22 de Julio played 9 de Octubre in Primera Categoría Serie B (Ecuador). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
22 de Julio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. 9 de Octubre: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
22 de Julio scores 0.71 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. 9 de Octubre scores 1.14 and concedes 0.71. League average: 1.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: 22 de Julio 29%, 9 de Octubre 29%. Over 2.5: 22 de Julio 29%, 9 de Octubre 29%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
9 de Octubre has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.02. 22 de Julio: 5.1 shots per match, 9 de Octubre: 10.6.
Match halves
22 de Julio: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.29. 9 de Octubre: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
22 de Julio: 0-15 (2 goals). 9 de Octubre: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera Categoría Serie B: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I expect a draw, because both teams have low shooting efficiency and solid defenses: the hosts concede on average 0.25 goals at home and have clean sheets in 75% of matches, while the visitors concede 0.33 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 67% of fixtures. The home side controls possession (60% vs 50%) and registers more shots (12 vs 8.33) and higher xG (1.21 vs 0.96), but that only converts to 0.75 goals per home match with 50% of games without scoring. The visitors’ main advantage is recent form: 4 wins in 5, 9 goals in that period and an average of 2.4 points per game, giving them clear momentum. Still, the high frequency of goalless away matches for the visitors (67% of matches without a goal) and the hosts’ defensive dominance point to a low-scoring, even result (e.g. 0:0 or 1:1).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates hosts 22 de Julio possess a strong offense this season: averaging 1.75 goals and xG 1.48 per match, 4.5 shots on target and a 14% conversion rate, making them clear candidates to score. Visitors 9 de Octubre have a low scoring average of 0.33 goals this season and a seasonal BTTS rate of 0%, while maintaining 67% clean sheets, which from season-long data strongly favors a scenario with no away goals. However, in the last 5 matches 9 de Octubre have scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and have last5 xG_for 1.35, whereas 22 de Julio in their last 5 matches have xG_against 1.42 and have conceded 6 goals, which significantly increases the probability that the visitors will also find the net. Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for the hosts and 0% for the visitors, and the league has BTTS 50% and 67% clean sheets, so signals are mixed, but the hosts’ offensive advantage plus the visitors’ recent scoring form incline me toward BTTS - Yes. Therefore I assess BTTS probability at 62% for Yes and 38% for No — the Yes selection reflects strong xG and last5 goals arguments despite the visitors’ season-long defensive stats.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast is based on xG: the home side have xG 1.48 versus the visitors' 0.96, and after averaging with opposing xG this yields 1.14 goals for the home team and 0.85 for the away team (total 1.99). A Poisson model with λ=1.99 gives the probability of three or more goals ≈32%, i.e. about a 68% chance of Under 2.5. Additionally, seasonal stats show the home team have 50% of matches Over 2.5, the visitors 0%, and the league average Over 2.5 is 36%, which does not suggest strong bias toward Over. The gap in shot quality (4.5 shots on target vs 1.67) and the visitors’ low finishing rate (4%) reduce the risk of multiple goals despite the visitors’ good recent form in the last 5 matches (9 goals). On that basis I select Under 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
22 de Julio scores on average 1.75 goals per home match versus 0.33 for 9 de Octubre, with xG of 1.48 against 0.96, indicating a home advantage in chance creation. In the first half the home side averages 0.75 goals and have scored at least once before the break in 75% of matches, whereas 9 de Octubre average 0.0 first-half goals and 0% in that regard, so a lead at the break for the hosts is more likely. Additionally, 22 de Julio register 4.5 shots on target at a 14% conversion rate versus 1.67 and 4% for the visitors, increasing the probability of maintaining the lead and securing a Half-Time/Full-Time home win. However, the last five meetings favor 9 de Octubre (80% wins in the last 5), which gives moderate weight to scenarios with a draw at half-time and a turnaround in the second half (hence elevated probability for X/1 and X/X). On this basis the strongest signal is 1/1 (home leading at the break and home win at full-time) with a 36% probability, considering the xG advantage (1.48) and the higher number of shots on target (4.5).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| 22 de Julio | 9 de Octubre | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.71 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
9 de Octubre is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - 22 de Julio · 1.8 pts / match - 9 de Octubre
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
9 de Octubre is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - 22 de Julio · 1.14 goals / match - 9 de Octubre
9 de Octubre is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - 22 de Julio · 0.71 goals / match - 9 de Octubre
22 de Julio scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while 9 de Octubre keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).
9 de Octubre scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while 22 de Julio keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - 22 de Julio
Over / Under - 9 de Octubre
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
22 de Julio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
9 de Octubre - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
22 de Julio
9 de Octubre
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera Categoría Serie B).
Teams vs league
| 22 de Julio | Liga | 9 de Octubre | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 1.93 | • 1.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 48% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 35% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 57% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 43% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- 9 de OctubreGoalGustavo Adolfo Asprilla Caicedo
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): 22 de Julio 1 - 1 - 0 9 de Octubre. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of 22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre?
The Primera Categoría Serie B match finished 22 de Julio 0:1 9 de Octubre. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between 22 de Julio and 9 de Octubre?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches 22 de Julio won 1, 9 de Octubre won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before 22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre?
22 de Julio score 0.71 goals per game on average and 9 de Octubre 1.14. The Primera Categoría Serie B average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 29% of 22 de Julio's matches and 29% of 9 de Octubre's.
What form are 22 de Julio and 9 de Octubre in?
Over the last 5 games 22 de Julio have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and 9 de Octubre 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre?
The statistical background for 22 de Julio vs 9 de Octubre — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


