Paraguay - Division IntermediaData current as of 17 October 2026

3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora: match statistics

3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

3 de Noviembre played Fernando de la Mora in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

3 de Noviembre: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Fernando de la Mora: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

3 de Noviembre scores 1.22 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Fernando de la Mora scores 1.11 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: 3 de Noviembre 59%, Fernando de la Mora 56%. Over 2.5: 3 de Noviembre 48%, Fernando de la Mora 44%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.42. 3 de Noviembre: 10.0 shots per match, Fernando de la Mora: 12.0.

Match halves

3 de Noviembre: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63. Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

3 de Noviembre: 0-15 (7 goals). Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Division Intermedia: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

3 de Noviembre are only 13th in the table, but they have won 3 of their last five matches and conceded just 4 goals; Fernando de la Mora have recorded 2 wins and conceded 7 goals over the same period. At home, the hosts average 1.38 goals per match, while the visitors average 1.23 away from home. However, the away side hold a slight edge in chance creation, with an xG of 1.44 compared to the hosts’ 1.35. 3 de Noviembre’s home shot-conversion rate also works in their favour: 15% compared to Fernando de la Mora’s 12% away from home, while their average goals conceded is slightly lower at 1.31 versus 1.46. However, the hosts draw as many as 54% of their home matches, so despite their better recent form, a draw remains a significant possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have scored at similar rates: 3 de Noviembre in 57% of matches and Fernando de la Mora in 54%, compared with the league average of 56%. Over their last 5 matches, the figure was 60% for each team, and both averaged 1.4 goals per match during that period. The home side generate an average of 1.68 xG, while the visitors produce 1.44 xG, pointing to scoring chances at both ends; the visitors also concede an average of 1.46 goals per season. The risk to the BTTS - Yes pick is that the home side failed to score in 29% of matches and the visitors in 31%. However, the combined season data and recent results give a moderate edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 79% of 3 de Noviembre’s matches and 69% of Fernando de la Mora’s fixtures. Both teams have scored relatively few goals this season, averaging 1.00 and 1.23 per match, respectively, although their average xG figures of 1.68 and 1.44 point to greater potential than their finishing record suggests. Over their last five matches, each team has averaged 1.4 goals scored, but only 40% of those games finished Over 2.5 goals. The forecast total of 2.44 goals, below the league average of 2.59, supports backing Under 3.5 goals without assuming the match has to be goalless.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: the hosts were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 69% for the visitors. Both teams scored relatively few first-half goals, averaging 0.36 and 0.38 respectively, which further points to a closely contested start. After the break, the advantage could shift towards 3 de Noviembre: the hosts won the second half in 36% of their matches, while Fernando de la Mora lost it in 46% and conceded an average of 1.08 goals. The hosts’ recent form also supports a home win: over their last five matches, they averaged 2.0 points against the visitors’ 1.4, and their xG stands at 1.68 compared with their opponents’ 1.44. Therefore, a half-time draw followed by a home win is the strongest single HT/FT scenario, although the 19% probability assigned to a draw in both halves indicates that the advantage is not substantial.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
11Shots8
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7Shots on target5
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.56xG1.19
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7Corners11
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
51Dangerous attacks44
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
12Fouls12
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
0Cards0
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.22Goals scored / match1.11
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.48Goals conceded / match1.37
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
47%Average possession51%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
4.33Shots on target / match3.74
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.04Shots per match12.04
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
4.33Shots on target3.74
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
12.2%Shot conversion9.2%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
47%Possession51%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.42xG for1.57
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.55xG against1.4
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

Shooting quality

3 de Noviembre: Counter-attackingFernando de la Mora: Balanced
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
Accuracy (shots on target)43%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

3 de Noviembre is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - 3 de Noviembre · 1.8 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora

3 de Noviembre
WWDWL
Season result split
22% W30% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Fernando de la Mora
WLWWL
Season result split
33% W26% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-11
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

3 de Noviembre is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - 3 de Noviembre · 1.11 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora

Fernando de la Mora is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - 3 de Noviembre · 1.37 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora

3 de Noviembre scoring profile: very strong

3 de Noviembre scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

Fernando de la Mora scoring profile: very strong

Fernando de la Mora scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while 3 de Noviembre keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 matches).

33Goals scored (season)30
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
40Goals conceded (season)37
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
2.7Average goals in match2.48
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7Goals scored (last 5)7
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
30%2 goals33%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
15%3 goals7%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
4%4 goals0%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal78%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
44%2 goals48%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
11%3 goals11%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7%4 goals0%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Fernando de la Mora - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 27 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
4%BTTS in both halves7%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
19%Scored in both halves15%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
60%BTTS - last 540%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

3 de Noviembre is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - 3 de Noviembre · 1.04 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora

3 de Noviembre - half-time state
26% leading41% draw33% trailing
Fernando de la Mora - half-time state
15% leading59% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.04
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.37
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.85
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
48%Clean sheet before half-time56%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
59%No goal before half-time67%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.22
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.63
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
37%Clean sheet after half-time44%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora
52%No goal after half-time48%
3 de NoviembreFernando de la Mora

3 de Noviembre - second-half results

15% W48% D37% L
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fernando de la Mora - second-half results

30% W33% D37% L
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding220%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

3 de Noviembre - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Fernando de la Mora - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

3 de Noviembre
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
7
5
16-30
2
8
31-45
7
4
46-60
4
8
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Fernando de la Mora
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
1
16-30
2
7
31-45
7
6
46-60
4
4
61-75
9
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

3 de Noviembre

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Fernando de la Mora

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).

Teams vs league

3 de NoviembreLigaFernando de la Mora
Average goals in match• 2.702.62▼ 2.48
Both teams scored▲ 59%56%• 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 48%46%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▼ 15%26%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%67%▼ 59%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%74%▲ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Substitutes

7Diego Arnaldo Álvarez Brítezon 1'
15Alexis Joel González Belottoon 1'
17Rodolfo Miguel López Da Silvaon 1'
18Iván Francisco Maciel Bogadoon 1'
22Hugo Javier Aquino Rodríguezon 1'
26Luis Alejandro Olmedo Carbajalon 1'

Other recorded players

—Hugo Aquino⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Fernando de la MoraGoalLuis Alfredo Galeano González
  2. Fernando de la MoraGoalDerlis Daniel Benítez Samaniego
  3. 3 de NoviembreGoalHugo Aquino

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: 3 de Noviembre 0 - 1 - 0 Fernando de la Mora. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of 3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora?

The Division Intermedia match finished 3 de Noviembre 3:2 Fernando de la Mora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before 3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora?

3 de Noviembre score 1.22 goals per game on average and Fernando de la Mora 1.11. The Division Intermedia average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 59% of 3 de Noviembre's matches and 56% of Fernando de la Mora's.

What form are 3 de Noviembre and Fernando de la Mora in?

Over the last 5 games 3 de Noviembre have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Fernando de la Mora 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora?

The statistical background for 3 de Noviembre vs Fernando de la Mora — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.