76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü: match statistics
76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
76 Iğdır Belediyespor played Keçiörengücü in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Keçiörengücü: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores 1.24 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Keçiörengücü scores 2.00 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 61%, Keçiörengücü 67%. Over 2.5: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 52%, Keçiörengücü 64%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Keçiörengücü has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.38. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 11.6 shots per match, Keçiörengücü: 12.7.
Match halves
76 Iğdır Belediyespor: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.61. Keçiörengücü: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 0-15 (12 goals). Keçiörengücü: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win: Keçiörengücü holds a clear advantage in form and efficiency — in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 13 goals (2.6 avg) and average 2.0 points per game, while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor have only 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 avg) and 0.2 points per game. On the season the visitors have 66 goals versus the hosts’ 41, and away they average 1.75 goals versus the hosts’ 1.38 at home. The home side creates slightly better quality chances at home (avg xG 1.59 vs visitors’ away xG 1.31), have more shots (13.5 vs 11.31) and 60% possession compared to the visitors’ 46%, but their efficiency is lower (10% conversion vs 15% for the visitors) and 25% of home matches end goalless for them. Defensively in the short term the visitors are superior: the hosts conceded 9 goals in their last 5 (1.8 avg) while the visitors conceded only 4 (0.8 avg), although seasonally the hosts concede 1.25 at home and the visitors 1.63 away. Considering the visitors’ advantage in goals (13 vs 3 in the last 5) and points per game, their better efficiency and the hosts’ poor run, I tip an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a strong signal for BTTS: Iğdır has a seasonal BTTS rate of 59%, Keçiörengücü 75%, averaging around 67% versus the league baseline of 50%, indicating an edge toward "both to score". The visitors are in clear attacking form — 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per game) and recent xG 1.55, while the hosts have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 per game) with xG 1.14, so the visitors' attacking strength largely drives the BTTS scenario. Seasonal xG for both sides 1.57 (home) + 1.31 (away) = 2.88, close to the league average 2.94, and average shots on target 5.18 vs 4.44 show both teams create chances. Counterpoints are the high clean sheet rate for the hosts at 41% and the fact hosts failed to score in 18% of their matches this season; however, the visitors rarely fail to score (13%) and Iğdır’s defense has conceded on average 1.8 goals per game in the last 5. Considering 59% vs 75% BTTS, the visitors’ strong scoring form and cumulative xG ≈2.88, I back "BTTS - Yes" with a 72% probability versus 28% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
After analyzing xG, the home side has xG_for 1.57 and the visitors 1.31. Considering xG_against versus this opponent (visitors concede 1.36, home concede 1.15), expected goals are ~1.47 for the home team and ~1.23 for the visitors, totalling ~2.70. Seasonal rates show Over 1.5 occurred in 82% of home matches and 75% of away matches, while Over 2.5 occurred in 71% and 56% respectively. A Poisson model for a mean of 2.70 gives Over 1.5 ~75% and Over 2.5 ~51%, so the 1.5 line has strong support. Additionally, in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 13 goals (2.6 avg) while the home team scored only 3 (0.6 avg), and the home side conceded 9 goals in that period, which increases the match’s scoring potential. Average shots 13.94 (home) vs 11.31 (away), shots on target 5.18 vs 4.44 and conversion rates 16%/15% plus high BTTS (59% home, 75% away) further support an Over bet. As a result I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimated ~78% probability), Over 2.5 rated at ~58%, and Over 3.5 at ~34%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Over the season the home side has a clear advantage: they average 2.24 goals per match versus Keçiörengücü’s 1.75 and concede 0.82 goals per match versus the visitors’ 1.63, with xG 1.57 versus 1.31. In first halves across the season the home team leads at the break in 53% of matches (9 occurrences), scoring on average 1.29 goals and conceding only 0.29, while the visitors average 1.00 goal and concede 0.94 by half‑time. However, recent form over the last 5 rounds must be considered: the home side have 0% wins in the last 5 (form 'lldll') and score on average 0.2 goals by the break, whereas the visitors have won 60% of their last 5 and led at the break in 60% of those games with an average of 1.2 goals. Taking into account the season-long home advantage (an average 1.76 points per home game and superior xG 1.57 vs 1.31) and their low average goals conceded by half‑time (0.29), the most likely scenario is the home team leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 outcome, while leaving room for a draw to the end (1/X 10% and X/X 11%) and for a strong but less likely run from the visitors (2/2 10%), which reflects the conflict between the home team’s season statistics and the visitors’ very good last‑5 form.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | Keçiörengücü | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Keçiörengücü is 900% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 2 pts / match - Keçiörengücü
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Keçiörengücü is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 2 goals / match - Keçiörengücü
Keçiörengücü is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.39 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 1.21 goals / match - Keçiörengücü
76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores in 70% of matches (23 of 33 matches), while Keçiörengücü keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
Keçiörengücü scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Over / Under - Keçiörengücü
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Keçiörengücü is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor · 1.7 pts / match - Keçiörengücü
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
76 Iğdır Belediyespor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Keçiörengücü - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Keçiörengücü
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | Liga | Keçiörengücü | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.64 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 29% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1 - 0 - 0 Keçiörengücü. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü?
The 1. Lig match finished 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 0:1 Keçiörengücü. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü?
76 Iğdır Belediyespor score 1.24 goals per game on average and Keçiörengücü 2.00. The 1. Lig average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's matches and 67% of Keçiörengücü's.
What form are 76 Iğdır Belediyespor and Keçiörengücü in?
Over the last 5 games 76 Iğdır Belediyespor have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Keçiörengücü 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü?
The statistical background for 76 Iğdır Belediyespor vs Keçiörengücü — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


