Aalesund vs KFUM: match statistics
Aalesund vs KFUM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Aalesund played KFUM in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Aalesund: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. KFUM: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Aalesund scores 1.33 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. KFUM scores 1.33 and concedes 1.67. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Aalesund 100%, KFUM 67%. Over 2.5: Aalesund 67%, KFUM 67%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Aalesund has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.44. Aalesund: 13.3 shots per match, KFUM: 12.0.
Match halves
Aalesund: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. KFUM: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Aalesund: 0-15 (2 goals). KFUM: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KFUM has a slight edge and I tip them to win because they sit 9th versus Aalesund’s 15th and have 3 wins in the last 5 matches versus the hosts’ 2; their points average in the last 5 is 1.8 vs 1.4 for Aalesund. The visitors significantly dominate possession – average possession 65% vs 45% – and register 8 shots on target per match vs 6.5 for the hosts, creating more opportunities despite nearly identical xG (1.67 for KFUM vs 1.68 for Aalesund). Both teams have serious defensive issues: Aalesund have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches vs 8 for KFUM, and on average both sides concede around 3 goals per game; clean sheets 0% and share of matches without scoring 0% indicate both sides regularly score and concede. Aalesund are slightly more efficient with shots (conversion rate 10% vs 8%), and at home they average 1.5 goals per match vs 1.0 for KFUM away; this can give the hosts chances, but deficiencies in game control are evident. For these reasons I forecast a KFUM victory, but expect an open, high-scoring game given the combined goals average of 4.5 in Aalesund matches and 4.0 in KFUM matches.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select the "both teams to score" scenario based on strong offensive and defensive signals: KFUM has a season BTTS rate of 100% and 0% clean sheets, while Aalesund has 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches (seasonal 50%), which significantly increases the likelihood of goals at both ends. In xG terms both teams are set up to score — Aalesund posts xG of 1.32 against KFUM’s average conceded xG of 1.75, and KFUM has xG 1.67 versus Aalesund’s average conceded xG of 1.14. Additionally, over the last 5 matches both sides have averaged 1.8 goals scored, with Aalesund conceding 2.0 on average and KFUM 1.6, indicating a high volume of goal-scoring opportunities for both teams. Shot statistics show KFUM averages 8.0 shots on target per match versus Aalesund’s 3.5, and despite lower finishing efficiency (8% vs 13%) KFUM generates enough chances to convert. Considering KFUM’s 100% season BTTS, Aalesund’s 100% BTTS in the last 5, and the league average goals of 2.95, I assess BTTS probability at 80% vs 20% and recommend a "yes" bet (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining the attacking xG and the opponent's defensive average yields expected goals: Aalesund ≈1.54 (1.32 xG vs opponent's average xG conceded KFUM 1.75), and KFUM ≈1.41 (1.67 xG vs opponent's average xG conceded Aalesund 1.14), giving a total of ~2.95 expected goals. This season both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 2.95 goals per game, so historically the 1.5 line has always been covered (100%/100%). KFUM concedes on average 3.0 goals per game, Aalesund scores on average 1.5 goals, and the away side averages 8.0 shots on target with an 8% conversion rate, which increases the goal potential in this fixture. In the last 5 matches both teams have averaged 1.8 goals each, Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of those games, and BTTS in the last 5 is 100% for the home side and 80% for the away side, further supporting a minimum-2-goal scenario. Based on this I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; I estimate probability of Over 1.5 ≈92%, Over 2.5 ≈68% and Over 3.5 ≈29%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The away team has yet to pick up any points this season (seasonPPG_away=0.0), with a 0% win rate and losing 100% of matches (winPercentage_away=0.0, losePercentage_away=100.0), while Aalesund wins 50% of its games and averages 1.5 goals per match (winPercentage_home=50.0, seasonScoredAVG_home=1.5), which favors the home side for the full-time victory. At half-time, metrics also favor a home lead: Aalesund averages 0.5 goals by the break, and the visitors concede an average of 3.0 goals before half-time (scoredAVGHT_home=0.5, concededAVGHT_away=3.0), so a home lead at half-time is likely. Technically the away side posts higher xG (1.67 vs 1.32) and more shots on target (8.0 vs 3.5), but with lower conversion (8% vs 13%), and the away team’s high average goals conceded (seasonConcededAVG_away=3.0) means Aalesund is more efficient with limited opportunities. Therefore I assess the highest probability for the 1/1 scenario: the home team leads at the break and wins the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Aalesund | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KFUM is 203% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / match - Aalesund · 1 pts / match - KFUM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KFUM is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.33 goals / match - Aalesund · 1.67 goals / match - KFUM
Aalesund scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
KFUM scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Aalesund keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Aalesund
Over / Under - KFUM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aalesund is 406% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / match - Aalesund · 0.33 pts / match - KFUM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Aalesund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KFUM - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.33 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.7 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 67% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 100% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Aalesund
KFUM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Aalesund | Liga | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 3.04 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 52% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 72% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Aalesund vs KFUM?
The Eliteserien match finished Aalesund 2:2 KFUM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Aalesund vs KFUM?
Aalesund score 1.33 goals per game on average and KFUM 1.33. The Eliteserien average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Aalesund's matches and 67% of KFUM's.
What form are Aalesund and KFUM in?
Over the last 5 games Aalesund have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and KFUM 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aalesund vs KFUM?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.