Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 12 September 2026

Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat: match statistics

Abia Warriors crest
Abia Warriors
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Kun Khalifat crest
Kun Khalifat

Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Abia Warriors played Kun Khalifat in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Abia Warriors: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kun Khalifat: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Abia Warriors scores 0.83 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Kun Khalifat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.17. League average: 1.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Abia Warriors 28%, Kun Khalifat 50%. Over 2.5: Abia Warriors 19%, Kun Khalifat 36%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Abia Warriors has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.20. Abia Warriors: 5.9 shots per match, Kun Khalifat: 5.1.

Match halves

Abia Warriors: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.42. Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Abia Warriors: 16-30 (7 goals). Kun Khalifat: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Abia Warriors are the favorites: they sit 6th in the table versus Kun Khalifat's 17th, and the hosts have a 61% home win rate compared to only 11% away wins for the visitors. Abia's biggest advantage is their home defense — just 0.39 goals conceded per match and 67% clean sheets at home, while Kun Khalifat concedes 1.44 goals on average away and records 17% clean sheets. Offensively the hosts create significantly more chances: 14.69 shots and 5.15 on target per home match with xG 1.66 and an average of 1.17 goals, whereas the visitors on the road average 5.88 shots, 2.5 on target and xG 0.93 translating to 0.72 goals. The last 5 matches, however, favor Kun Khalifat in terms of form — the visitors scored 9 goals and average 2.0 pts/match in their last 5, while Abia have 4 goals and 1.2 pts/match, giving the guests offensive momentum. Considering Abia's substantially better home defense and chance creation and Kun Khalifat's poor away numbers, I predict a home win; probabilities: home 65%, draw 20%, away 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Abia Warriors have a seasonal BTTS of 44%, Kun Khalifat 56%, against a league average BTTS of 38%, indicating a slightly higher-than-league probability of both teams scoring. Estimated xG per match is (1.35+1.49)/2 = 1.42 for Abia and (0.93+1.15)/2 = 1.04 for Kun; both values are above 1.0, meaning both teams possess realistic attacking potential. In the last 5 matches Kun scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded on average 1.2, while Abia scored 4 goals (0.8) and conceded 1.4, which shows the visitors are a clear source of goals and the home side has an edge in shots (11.31 vs 5.88) and shots on target (3.54 vs 2.5). Abia keep a clean sheet in 39% of matches, Kun only in 17%, therefore combining xG, recent form and clean sheet percentages I tip BTTS - Yes with a 62% probability versus 38% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis shows Abia Warriors has average attacking xG 1.35, while Kun Khalifat’s defense concedes xG 1.49, yielding estimated home expected goals ≈1.42; Kun’s attacking xG is 0.93 versus Abia’s defense 1.15, hence ≈1.04 for the visitors, total ≈2.46 goals. Abia generates significantly more chances — on average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target versus 5.88 and 2.5 for Kun — increasing the likelihood of them scoring. Seasonal indicators show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 67% of Abia’s matches and 78% of Kun’s matches ended with ≥2 goals, and the last 5 matches produced 4 goals for Abia and 9 goals for Kun, further supporting the goals forecast. A Poisson model with μ=2.46 gives roughly a 70% probability for Over 1.5, about 45% for Over 2.5 and about 23% for Over 3.5. Based on this I recommend backing the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal; the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are less valuable in line with seasonal Over rates Over 2.5: 39%/33% and Over 3.5: 17%/6%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Abia Warriors are the favorites: at home they have 50% wins, 17% draws and 33% losses, while Kun Khalifat win only 11% of away matches, draw 39% and lose 50%. The home side generate more quality chances — xG 1.35 versus 0.93, and average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target compared to the visitors' 5.88 shots and 2.5 on target. At the break Abia led in 6 matches (33%) and were level in 8 (44%), and with a 50% home win rate the conversion of a lead at the break into a final victory is high (estimated 5 of 6 cases, ~83%). After the interval the hosts score on average 0.83 goals versus 0.35 for the visitors and have 83% of matches with at least one goal in the second half versus 71% for the opponents, which increases the chance of maintaining/extending a lead. For these reasons the strongest signal is Abia leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) — I assess this scenario at 28%; also realistic are X/1 and X/2 at about 16% each.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
-1Shots-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
-1Shots on target-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0xG0
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
-1Corners-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0Dangerous attacks0
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
-1Fouls-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
-1Cards-1
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.83Goals scored / match1.03
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.83Goals conceded / match1.17
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
27%Average possession30%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
1.81Shots on target / match1.42
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.94Shots per match5.08
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
1.81Shots on target1.42
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
14%Shot conversion20.2%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
27%Possession30%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
1.41xG for1.2
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
1.32xG against1.27
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Shooting quality

Abia Warriors: Counter-attackingKun Khalifat: Counter-attacking
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
Accuracy (shots on target)30%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.73

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kun Khalifat is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Abia Warriors · 2 pts / match - Kun Khalifat

Abia Warriors
LWLWL
Season result split
44% W19% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-13
1.53 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-6-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Kun Khalifat
LWWDW
Season result split
31% W28% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-15
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kun Khalifat is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Abia Warriors · 1.03 goals / match - Kun Khalifat

Abia Warriors is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Abia Warriors · 1.17 goals / match - Kun Khalifat

Abia Warriors scoring profile: strong

Abia Warriors scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 matches).

Kun Khalifat scoring profile: strong

Kun Khalifat scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while Abia Warriors keeps a clean sheet in 44% (16 of 36 matches).

30Goals scored (season)37
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
30Goals conceded (season)42
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
1.67Average goals in match2.19
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
4Goals scored (last 5)9
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal72%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
19%2 goals25%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0%3 goals6%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0%4 goals0%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal72%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
25%2 goals33%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
3%3 goals8%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0%4 goals3%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time17%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
11%Scored in both halves11%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
40%BTTS - last 560%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Abia Warriors is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Abia Warriors · 1.14 pts / match - Kun Khalifat

Abia Warriors - half-time state
28% leading58% draw14% trailing
Kun Khalifat - half-time state
22% leading47% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.14
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.28Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.69Average goals (1st half)0.97
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
78%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
67%No goal before half-time61%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.14
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
58%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat
58%No goal after half-time56%
Abia WarriorsKun Khalifat

Abia Warriors - second-half results

28% W42% D31% L
51
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kun Khalifat - second-half results

36% W33% D31% L
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Abia Warriors - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kun Khalifat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Abia Warriors
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
7
1
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
8
46-60
4
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kun Khalifat
ScoredConceded
5
9
0-15
5
5
16-30
6
8
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Abia Warriors

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Kun Khalifat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
181%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Abia WarriorsLigaKun Khalifat
Average goals in match 1.671.99 2.19
Both teams scored 28%38% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 19%33% 36%
Clean sheets 44%37% 28%
Goal before half-time 47%60% 64%
Goal after half-time 69%64% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.99
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
0.57
Away goals / match
+149%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+51%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Substitutes

11Adamu Mohammadon 1'
13Christogonus Ibeon 1'
14Chinonso Charleson 1'
16Chijioke Ejioguon 1'
27Onyedika Onuorahon 1'
33Stanley Nnanna Otuon 1'
34Purpose Ahubaraezemaon 1'

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kun KhalifatGoalUchechukwu Onuoha
  2. Kun KhalifatGoalUchechukwu Onuoha

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Abia Warriors 1 - 0 - 0 Kun Khalifat. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?

The NPFL match finished Abia Warriors 0:2 Kun Khalifat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?

Abia Warriors score 0.83 goals per game on average and Kun Khalifat 1.03. The NPFL average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Abia Warriors's matches and 50% of Kun Khalifat's.

What form are Abia Warriors and Kun Khalifat in?

Over the last 5 games Abia Warriors have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kun Khalifat 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?

The statistical background for Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.