Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat: match statistics
Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Abia Warriors played Kun Khalifat in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Abia Warriors: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kun Khalifat: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Abia Warriors scores 0.83 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Kun Khalifat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.17. League average: 1.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Abia Warriors 28%, Kun Khalifat 50%. Over 2.5: Abia Warriors 19%, Kun Khalifat 36%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Abia Warriors has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.20. Abia Warriors: 5.9 shots per match, Kun Khalifat: 5.1.
Match halves
Abia Warriors: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.42. Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Abia Warriors: 16-30 (7 goals). Kun Khalifat: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abia Warriors are the favorites: they sit 6th in the table versus Kun Khalifat's 17th, and the hosts have a 61% home win rate compared to only 11% away wins for the visitors. Abia's biggest advantage is their home defense — just 0.39 goals conceded per match and 67% clean sheets at home, while Kun Khalifat concedes 1.44 goals on average away and records 17% clean sheets. Offensively the hosts create significantly more chances: 14.69 shots and 5.15 on target per home match with xG 1.66 and an average of 1.17 goals, whereas the visitors on the road average 5.88 shots, 2.5 on target and xG 0.93 translating to 0.72 goals. The last 5 matches, however, favor Kun Khalifat in terms of form — the visitors scored 9 goals and average 2.0 pts/match in their last 5, while Abia have 4 goals and 1.2 pts/match, giving the guests offensive momentum. Considering Abia's substantially better home defense and chance creation and Kun Khalifat's poor away numbers, I predict a home win; probabilities: home 65%, draw 20%, away 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Abia Warriors have a seasonal BTTS of 44%, Kun Khalifat 56%, against a league average BTTS of 38%, indicating a slightly higher-than-league probability of both teams scoring. Estimated xG per match is (1.35+1.49)/2 = 1.42 for Abia and (0.93+1.15)/2 = 1.04 for Kun; both values are above 1.0, meaning both teams possess realistic attacking potential. In the last 5 matches Kun scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded on average 1.2, while Abia scored 4 goals (0.8) and conceded 1.4, which shows the visitors are a clear source of goals and the home side has an edge in shots (11.31 vs 5.88) and shots on target (3.54 vs 2.5). Abia keep a clean sheet in 39% of matches, Kun only in 17%, therefore combining xG, recent form and clean sheet percentages I tip BTTS - Yes with a 62% probability versus 38% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows Abia Warriors has average attacking xG 1.35, while Kun Khalifat’s defense concedes xG 1.49, yielding estimated home expected goals ≈1.42; Kun’s attacking xG is 0.93 versus Abia’s defense 1.15, hence ≈1.04 for the visitors, total ≈2.46 goals. Abia generates significantly more chances — on average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target versus 5.88 and 2.5 for Kun — increasing the likelihood of them scoring. Seasonal indicators show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 67% of Abia’s matches and 78% of Kun’s matches ended with ≥2 goals, and the last 5 matches produced 4 goals for Abia and 9 goals for Kun, further supporting the goals forecast. A Poisson model with μ=2.46 gives roughly a 70% probability for Over 1.5, about 45% for Over 2.5 and about 23% for Over 3.5. Based on this I recommend backing the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal; the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are less valuable in line with seasonal Over rates Over 2.5: 39%/33% and Over 3.5: 17%/6%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Abia Warriors are the favorites: at home they have 50% wins, 17% draws and 33% losses, while Kun Khalifat win only 11% of away matches, draw 39% and lose 50%. The home side generate more quality chances — xG 1.35 versus 0.93, and average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target compared to the visitors' 5.88 shots and 2.5 on target. At the break Abia led in 6 matches (33%) and were level in 8 (44%), and with a 50% home win rate the conversion of a lead at the break into a final victory is high (estimated 5 of 6 cases, ~83%). After the interval the hosts score on average 0.83 goals versus 0.35 for the visitors and have 83% of matches with at least one goal in the second half versus 71% for the opponents, which increases the chance of maintaining/extending a lead. For these reasons the strongest signal is Abia leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) — I assess this scenario at 28%; also realistic are X/1 and X/2 at about 16% each.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Abia Warriors | Kun Khalifat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.73 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kun Khalifat is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Abia Warriors · 2 pts / match - Kun Khalifat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kun Khalifat is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Abia Warriors · 1.03 goals / match - Kun Khalifat
Abia Warriors is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Abia Warriors · 1.17 goals / match - Kun Khalifat
Abia Warriors scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 matches).
Kun Khalifat scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while Abia Warriors keeps a clean sheet in 44% (16 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Abia Warriors
Over / Under - Kun Khalifat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Abia Warriors is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Abia Warriors · 1.14 pts / match - Kun Khalifat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abia Warriors - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kun Khalifat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Abia Warriors
Kun Khalifat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Abia Warriors | Liga | Kun Khalifat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.67 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 33% | ▲ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 37% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 60% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 64% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Abia Warriors 1 - 0 - 0 Kun Khalifat. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?
The NPFL match finished Abia Warriors 0:2 Kun Khalifat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?
Abia Warriors score 0.83 goals per game on average and Kun Khalifat 1.03. The NPFL average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Abia Warriors's matches and 50% of Kun Khalifat's.
What form are Abia Warriors and Kun Khalifat in?
Over the last 5 games Abia Warriors have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kun Khalifat 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat?
The statistical background for Abia Warriors vs Kun Khalifat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


