Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: match statistics

165%(1.70)
X22%(3.25)
213%(5.60)

Abu Qair Semad presents significantly better form, especially at their own stadium, where they win 60% of matches and keep a clean sheet in 60% of fixtures. The hosts are in excellent disposition with a series of five matches without defeat (3 wins, 2 draws) and concede an average of only 0.5 goals per home match. El Entag El Harby has very poor results on the road – losing as many as 55% of away matches, earning just 1 point per match in the last five meetings. The guests concede an average of 1.55 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (xG Against 1.37 vs xG For 1.67), gives Abu Qair Semad a clear advantage. The difference in goal difference (+6 for hosts at home vs -3 for guests away) and the advantage in every aspect of home play confirm that the hosts are the decided favorite for this meeting.

Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Abu Qair Semad play El Entag El Harby in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 5 February 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Abu Qair Semad: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. El Entag El Harby: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Abu Qair Semad scores 1.18 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. El Entag El Harby scores 1.12 and concedes 1.38. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Abu Qair Semad 41%, El Entag El Harby 56%. Over 2.5: Abu Qair Semad 32%, El Entag El Harby 50%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.24. Abu Qair Semad: 9.6 shots per match, El Entag El Harby: 7.9.

Match halves

Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59. El Entag El Harby: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (8 goals). El Entag El Harby: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Abu Qair Semad presents significantly better form, especially at their own stadium, where they win 60% of matches and keep a clean sheet in 60% of fixtures. The hosts are in excellent disposition with a series of five matches without defeat (3 wins, 2 draws) and concede an average of only 0.5 goals per home match. El Entag El Harby has very poor results on the road – losing as many as 55% of away matches, earning just 1 point per match in the last five meetings. The guests concede an average of 1.55 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (xG Against 1.37 vs xG For 1.67), gives Abu Qair Semad a clear advantage. The difference in goal difference (+6 for hosts at home vs -3 for guests away) and the advantage in every aspect of home play confirm that the hosts are the decided favorite for this meeting.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
21Shots2
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
6Shots on target2
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
2.24xG0.38
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
9Corners1
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
71Dangerous attacks15
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
23Fouls9
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0Cards0
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
1.18Goals scored / match1.12
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.74Goals conceded / match1.38
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
44%Average possession42%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
4.24Shots on target / match3.21
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.62Shots per match7.88
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
4.24Shots on target3.21
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
12.2%Shot conversion14.2%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
44%Possession42%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
1.59xG for1.24
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
1xG against1.5
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Shooting quality

Abu Qair Semad: Counter-attackingEl Entag El Harby: Counter-attacking
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
Accuracy (shots on target)44%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Abu Qair Semad is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1 pts / match - El Entag El Harby

Abu Qair Semad
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W38% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-13-6
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
El Entag El Harby
LDWLD
Season result split
29% W29% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-14
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-7
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Abu Qair Semad is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.12 goals / match - El Entag El Harby

Abu Qair Semad is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.38 goals / match - El Entag El Harby

Abu Qair Semad scoring profile: very strong

Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while El Entag El Harby keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

El Entag El Harby scoring profile: mixed

El Entag El Harby scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

40Goals scored (season)38
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
25Goals conceded (season)47
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
1.91Average goals in match2.5
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal71%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
26%2 goals32%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
15%3 goals9%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
3%4 goals0%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal76%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
15%2 goals41%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
6%3 goals15%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0%4 goals6%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
El Entag El Harby - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 34 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
18%Scored in both halves24%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
40%BTTS - last 540%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Abu Qair Semad is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.12 pts / match - El Entag El Harby

Abu Qair Semad - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing
El Entag El Harby - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.12
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.79Average goals (1st half)1
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
71%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
53%No goal before half-time65%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
68%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby
59%No goal after half-time41%
Abu Qair SemadEl Entag El Harby

Abu Qair Semad - second-half results

35% W38% R26% P
50
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

El Entag El Harby - second-half results

32% W41% R26% P
38
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Abu Qair Semad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
El Entag El Harby - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Abu Qair Semad
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

El Entag El Harby
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
4
7
16-30
6
8
31-45
5
8
46-60
10
5
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Abu Qair Semad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

El Entag El Harby

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Abu Qair SemadLigaEl Entag El Harby
Average goals in match 1.911.95 2.50
Both teams scored 41%41% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%32% 50%
Clean sheets 47%38% 24%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 65%67% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Abu Qair Semad 1 - 0 - 0 El Entag El Harby. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

El Entag El Harby
0 : 2
Abu Qair Semad

FAQ

What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?

The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 1:2 El Entag El Harby. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?

Abu Qair Semad score 1.18 goals per game on average and El Entag El Harby 1.12. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 56% of El Entag El Harby's.

What form are Abu Qair Semad and El Entag El Harby in?

Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and El Entag El Harby 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.