Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: match statistics
Abu Qair Semad presents significantly better form, especially at their own stadium, where they win 60% of matches and keep a clean sheet in 60% of fixtures. The hosts are in excellent disposition with a series of five matches without defeat (3 wins, 2 draws) and concede an average of only 0.5 goals per home match. El Entag El Harby has very poor results on the road – losing as many as 55% of away matches, earning just 1 point per match in the last five meetings. The guests concede an average of 1.55 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (xG Against 1.37 vs xG For 1.67), gives Abu Qair Semad a clear advantage. The difference in goal difference (+6 for hosts at home vs -3 for guests away) and the advantage in every aspect of home play confirm that the hosts are the decided favorite for this meeting.
Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Abu Qair Semad played El Entag El Harby in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 5 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Abu Qair Semad: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. El Entag El Harby: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Abu Qair Semad scores 1.24 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. El Entag El Harby scores 1.05 and concedes 1.52. League average: 1.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Abu Qair Semad 43%, El Entag El Harby 57%. Over 2.5: Abu Qair Semad 33%, El Entag El Harby 48%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Abu Qair Semad: 7.4 shots per match, El Entag El Harby: 8.9.
Match halves
Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.62. El Entag El Harby: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (6 goals). El Entag El Harby: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.88 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Abu Qair Semad presents significantly better form, especially at their own stadium, where they win 60% of matches and keep a clean sheet in 60% of fixtures. The hosts are in excellent disposition with a series of five matches without defeat (3 wins, 2 draws) and concede an average of only 0.5 goals per home match. El Entag El Harby has very poor results on the road – losing as many as 55% of away matches, earning just 1 point per match in the last five meetings. The guests concede an average of 1.55 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' solid defense (xG Against 1.37 vs xG For 1.67), gives Abu Qair Semad a clear advantage. The difference in goal difference (+6 for hosts at home vs -3 for guests away) and the advantage in every aspect of home play confirm that the hosts are the decided favorite for this meeting.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Abu Qair Semad | El Entag El Harby | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Abu Qair Semad is 120% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1 pts / match - El Entag El Harby
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.05 goals / match - El Entag El Harby
Abu Qair Semad is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.52 goals / match - El Entag El Harby
Abu Qair Semad scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while El Entag El Harby keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
El Entag El Harby scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Abu Qair Semad
Over / Under - El Entag El Harby
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Abu Qair Semad is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1 pts / match - El Entag El Harby
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
El Entag El Harby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Abu Qair Semad
El Entag El Harby
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Abu Qair Semad | Liga | El Entag El Harby | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.88 | ▲ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 40% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- El Entag El HarbyGoalFahd Aboul Fetouh
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Abu Qair Semad 1 - 0 - 0 El Entag El Harby. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?
The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 1:2 El Entag El Harby. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?
Abu Qair Semad score 1.24 goals per game on average and El Entag El Harby 1.05. The Second Division average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 57% of El Entag El Harby's.
What form are Abu Qair Semad and El Entag El Harby in?
Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and El Entag El Harby 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Abu Qair Semad vs El Entag El Harby: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.