England - EFL League TwoData current as of 13 September 2026

Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield: match statistics

130%(3.90)
X25%(3.40)
245%(1.82)

Chesterfield appear to be the favorites for this match despite playing away. The visitors are 8th in the table and have a significantly better goal difference this season (60 goals scored). Accrington Stanley are in 15th place and are going through a very poor run of form - in their last 5 matches they have collected just 2 points and scored 2 goals, indicating serious offensive issues. Chesterfield have a higher shot accuracy (14% vs 9%) and dominate in possession (58% vs 49%), which gives them a tactical advantage. Both teams are in poor form recently, but Chesterfield show greater offensive potential, which could be decisive for their victory. Considering all statistics, the visitors have a realistic chance of taking all three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out.

Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Accrington Stanley played Chesterfield in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Accrington Stanley: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Chesterfield: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Accrington Stanley scores 1.03 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Chesterfield scores 1.58 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Accrington Stanley 41%, Chesterfield 63%. Over 2.5: Accrington Stanley 32%, Chesterfield 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Chesterfield has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.36. Accrington Stanley: 12.1 shots per match, Chesterfield: 12.2.

Match halves

Accrington Stanley: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.51. Chesterfield: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Accrington Stanley: 61-75 (8 goals). Chesterfield: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chesterfield appear to be the favorites for this match despite playing away. The visitors are 8th in the table and have a significantly better goal difference this season (60 goals scored). Accrington Stanley are in 15th place and are going through a very poor run of form - in their last 5 matches they have collected just 2 points and scored 2 goals, indicating serious offensive issues. Chesterfield have a higher shot accuracy (14% vs 9%) and dominate in possession (58% vs 49%), which gives them a tactical advantage. Both teams are in poor form recently, but Chesterfield show greater offensive potential, which could be decisive for their victory. Considering all statistics, the visitors have a realistic chance of taking all three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
13Shots14
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
6Shots on target3
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.54xG1.52
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
4Corners7
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
41Dangerous attacks59
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
10Fouls13
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
2Cards1
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.03Goals scored / match1.58
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.11Goals conceded / match1.37
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
48%Average possession58%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
4.08Shots on target / match4.08
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.11Shots per match12.16
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
4.08Shots on target4.08
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
8.5%Shot conversion13%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
48%Possession58%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.36xG for1.42
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.43xG against1.27
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Shooting quality

Accrington Stanley: BalancedChesterfield: Efficient finishing
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chesterfield is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Accrington Stanley · 1.2 pts / match - Chesterfield

Accrington Stanley
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W24% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-15
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chesterfield
LWLWL
Season result split
39% W37% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-14-9
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-7-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chesterfield is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Accrington Stanley · 1.58 goals / match - Chesterfield

Accrington Stanley is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Accrington Stanley · 1.37 goals / match - Chesterfield

Accrington Stanley scoring profile: strong

Accrington Stanley scores in 62% of matches (23 of 37 matches), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).

Chesterfield scoring profile: very strong

Chesterfield scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Accrington Stanley keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).

38Goals scored (season)60
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
41Goals conceded (season)52
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
2.14Average goals in match2.95
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
2Goals scored (last 5)8
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal87%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
22%2 goals47%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
14%3 goals21%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
5%4 goals3%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal74%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
30%2 goals37%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
8%3 goals16%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
3%4 goals5%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
Accrington Stanley - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 37 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time29%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
3%BTTS in both halves16%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
22%Scored in both halves32%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
40%BTTS - last 540%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Accrington Stanley is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.49 pts / match - Accrington Stanley · 1.42 pts / match - Chesterfield

Accrington Stanley - half-time state
38% leading35% draw27% trailing
Chesterfield - half-time state
34% leading39% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.49Points per match (1st half)1.42
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
0.51Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
0.49Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1Average goals (1st half)1.42
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
62%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
54%No goal before half-time45%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.55
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
0.51Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
1.14Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
51%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield
62%No goal after half-time37%
Accrington StanleyChesterfield

Accrington Stanley - second-half results

24% W38% D38% L
55
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.49
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chesterfield - second-half results

45% W21% D34% L
54
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Accrington Stanley - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Chesterfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Accrington Stanley
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
3
7
46-60
8
9
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chesterfield
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
8
8
16-30
11
13
31-45
5
8
46-60
12
9
61-75
16
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+136%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Accrington Stanley

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Chesterfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Accrington StanleyLigaChesterfield
Average goals in match 2.142.55 2.95
Both teams scored 41%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%47% 50%
Clean sheets 30%27% 26%
Goal before half-time 73%67% 76%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ChesterfieldYellow cardSammy Braybroke
  2. Accrington StanleyYellow cardShaun James Whalley
  3. Accrington StanleyYellow cardDan Martin
  4. ChesterfieldGoalWill DicksonAssist: Tom Naylor
  5. Accrington StanleySubstitutionOn: Dave AbimbolaOff: Isaac Sinclair
  6. ChesterfieldSubstitutionOn: Lee BonisOff: Will Dickson
  7. Accrington StanleySubstitutionOn: Tyler WaltonOff: Séamus Conneely
  8. ChesterfieldSubstitutionOn: Armando DobraOff: James Berry-McNally
  9. Accrington StanleySubstitutionOn: Freddie SassOff: Dan Martin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Accrington Stanley 0 - 1 - 0 Chesterfield. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Chesterfield FC
3 : 3
Accrington Stanley FC

FAQ

What was the result of Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield?

The EFL League Two match finished Accrington Stanley 0:1 Chesterfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield?

Accrington Stanley score 1.03 goals per game on average and Chesterfield 1.58. The EFL League Two average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Accrington Stanley's matches and 63% of Chesterfield's.

What form are Accrington Stanley and Chesterfield in?

Over the last 5 games Accrington Stanley have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Chesterfield 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Accrington Stanley vs Chesterfield: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.