Romania - Liga IIStadionul GloriaData current as of 19 October 2026

ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics

ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ACS Gloria Bistrita played Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Venue: Stadionul Gloria. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

ACS Gloria Bistrita: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Concordia Chiajna: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

ACS Gloria Bistrita scores 2.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Concordia Chiajna scores 2.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ACS Gloria Bistrita 50%, Concordia Chiajna 50%. Over 2.5: ACS Gloria Bistrita 100%, Concordia Chiajna 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

ACS Gloria Bistrita has higher xG: 2.09 vs 1.53. ACS Gloria Bistrita: 16.0 shots per match, Concordia Chiajna: 12.0.

Match halves

ACS Gloria Bistrita: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.50. Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

ACS Gloria Bistrita: 76-90+ (3 goals). Concordia Chiajna: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams opened the season with 2 wins and a 5:1 goal difference, while each has collected 10 points in their last five matches. However, ACS Gloria Bistrita have a clear advantage in chance creation at home, averaging 21 shots and 8 on target per match, compared with Concordia’s 10 shots and 4 on target away from home. The hosts also generate significantly higher xG, at 2.64 versus 1.31 for the visitors, while their 59% possession should allow them to control the flow of the game more frequently. Concordia average 3 goals scored away from home and boast a very high 30% conversion rate, but they allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.90 xG. Both teams concede an average of one goal per match and have yet to keep a clean sheet, so the visitors are capable of finding the net, but the superior quality of chances created points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is slightly positive, as Gloria Bistrita averages 2.0 goals and Concordia Chiajna 3.0 goals in the season data. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.67 xG per match, while Concordia’s defence allows opponents 1.90 xG, which clearly increases Gloria’s chances of scoring. Concordia also has offensive arguments: they have averaged 1.8 goals in their last five matches, while the hosts, despite conceding only 0.8 goals on average during this period, allowed opponents 1.25 xG. The risk to the pick is that both teams scored in only 40% of their last five matches, while Gloria kept a clean sheet in 100% of the available season matches. Nevertheless, the high scoring efficiency of both sides and the fact that 64% of league matches featured a goal from each team provide slight support for the BTTS scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams regularly create chances: Gloria’s average xG is 1.67, while Concordia’s stands at 1.31, with their opponents allowing 1.90 and 1.59 xG respectively. In their last five matches, the home side averaged 2.0 goals scored, while the visitors averaged 1.8; both teams conceded 0.8 goals per match. The 1.5 line has been exceeded in 100% of both teams’ matches to date, while the league average is 2.73 goals. Gloria averages 14 shots, including 6 on target, which reinforces its attacking potential, while Concordia has scored in every match and is averaging 3.0 goals in the current-season data. The strongest signal is therefore Over 1.5, as even after a cautious adjustment for the small sample, the projected 2.80 goals is clearly above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an ACS Gloria Bistrita win at full-time, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches and never trailed. Over this period, Gloria averaged 1.4 goals after half-time compared with Concordia’s 1.0, while their second-half goal difference stood at +3 versus +2 for the visitors. The hosts also have a higher average attacking xG, 1.67 compared with 1.31, and record an average of six shots on target per match, while Concordia averages four. Both teams won 60% of their last five matches, but Gloria conceded only 0.8 goals per game, and home advantage further strengthens their chances of settling an evenly matched first half after the break. The risk comes from Concordia’s very strong start in the current away sample, in which they led at half-time and scored two goals before the interval, making X/2 a significant alternative scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
11Shots11
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
4Shots on target3
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
1.39xG1.33
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
5Corners6
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
57Dangerous attacks58
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
9Fouls14
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0Cards0
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
2.5Goals scored / match2.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0.5Goals conceded / match0.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
54%Average possession50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
7Shots on target / match5.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match12
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
7Shots on target5.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
15.6%Shot conversion20.8%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
54%Possession50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
2.09xG for1.53
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
1.25xG against1.78
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

Shooting quality

ACS Gloria Bistrita: AttackingConcordia Chiajna: Efficient finishing
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

ACS Gloria Bistrita
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 2.09Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Concordia Chiajna
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ACS Gloria Bistrita scoring profile: very strong

ACS Gloria Bistrita scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while ACS Gloria Bistrita keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

5Goals scored (season)5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
1Goals conceded (season)1
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
3Average goals in match3
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
5Goals scored (last 5)5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
100%2 goals100%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
50%3 goals50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%4 goals0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%2 goals0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%3 goals0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%4 goals0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
ACS Gloria Bistrita - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.1 of 2 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%Scored in both halves50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
50%BTTS - last 550%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
100%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Concordia Chiajna is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - ACS Gloria Bistrita · 2 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna

ACS Gloria Bistrita - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0Goals scored (1st half)1
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0Average goals (1st half)1
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
100%No goal before half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)2
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
2.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
3Average goals (2nd half)2
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna
0%No goal after half-time0%
ACS Gloria BistritaConcordia Chiajna

ACS Gloria Bistrita - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ACS Gloria Bistrita - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.02.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.03.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Concordia Chiajna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ACS Gloria Bistrita
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ACS Gloria Bistrita

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.84
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.5
Late goals
60% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
60%

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
212%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

ACS Gloria BistritaLigaConcordia Chiajna
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.73▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 50%64%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%55%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%20%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%73%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%77%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ACS Gloria BistritaGoalJimmy King Otega
  2. Concordia ChiajnaGoalEmmanuel Asibey

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: ACS Gloria Bistrita 0 - 0 - 1 Concordia Chiajna. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Concordia Chiajna
2 : 0
ACS Gloria Bistrita

FAQ

What was the result of ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna?

The Liga II match finished ACS Gloria Bistrita 1:2 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna?

ACS Gloria Bistrita score 2.50 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 2.50. The Liga II average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of ACS Gloria Bistrita's matches and 50% of Concordia Chiajna's.

What form are ACS Gloria Bistrita and Concordia Chiajna in?

Over the last 5 games ACS Gloria Bistrita have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ACS Gloria Bistrita vs Concordia Chiajna: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.