Indonesia - Liga 1Stadion Kapten I Wayan DiptaData current as of 21 October 2026

Adhyaksa vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Adhyaksa vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Adhyaksa play PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: Stadion Kapten I Wayan Dipta.

Current form

Adhyaksa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Adhyaksa scores 0.50 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 0.50 and concedes 1.83. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Adhyaksa 33%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. Over 2.5: Adhyaksa 33%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.22 vs 0.78. Adhyaksa: 4.3 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 9.0.

Match halves

Adhyaksa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Adhyaksa: 16-30 (1 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals scored / match0.5
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
2Goals conceded / match1.83
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
41%Average possession51%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.33Shots on target / match2.83
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.33Shots per match9
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.33Shots on target2.83
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
11.5%Shot conversion5.6%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
41%Possession51%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.78xG for1.22
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.76xG against1.93
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Adhyaksa: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Adhyaksa
LLLWD
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W17% D83% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-5
0.17 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Adhyaksa · 1.83 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Adhyaksa scoring profile: very strong

Adhyaksa scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Adhyaksa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

3Goals scored (season)3
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
12Goals conceded (season)11
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
2.5Average goals in match2.33
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
3Goals scored (last 5)2
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0%2 goals0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0%3 goals0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal100%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
50%2 goals50%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
33%3 goals17%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
33%4 goals17%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Scored in both halves0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
40%BTTS - last 540%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time17%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Adhyaksa · 1.33 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Adhyaksa - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
17% leading83% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.33
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.17
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.17
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
83%No goal before half-time83%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)0.17
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.83
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
1.33Average goals (2nd half)2.17
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
33%Clean sheet after half-time0%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta
67%No goal after half-time67%
AdhyaksaPSIM Yogyakarta

Adhyaksa - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

0% W17% D83% L
8
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.8

Concedes 1.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Adhyaksa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.02.0
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-9
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Adhyaksa
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
3
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Adhyaksa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.98
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
29%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AdhyaksaLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match▼ 2.502.96▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%63%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%56%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 17%19%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%69%▼ 17%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Adhyaksa and PSIM Yogyakarta play?

Adhyaksa face PSIM Yogyakarta on 24 October 2026 in Liga 1 at Stadion Kapten I Wayan Dipta. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Adhyaksa vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Adhyaksa score 0.50 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 0.50. The Liga 1 average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Adhyaksa's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Adhyaksa and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Adhyaksa have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Adhyaksa vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The statistical background for Adhyaksa vs PSIM Yogyakarta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.