ADT vs Los Chankas: match statistics
ADT vs Los Chankas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
ADT played Los Chankas in Primera División (Peru). The match was played on 27 April 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
ADT: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Los Chankas: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
ADT scores 1.00 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Los Chankas scores 1.91 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: ADT 45%, Los Chankas 64%. Over 2.5: ADT 36%, Los Chankas 45%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
ADT has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.32. ADT: 13.6 shots per match, Los Chankas: 12.3.
Match halves
ADT: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55. Los Chankas: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
ADT: 76-90+ (3 goals). Los Chankas: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Los Chankas). This season Los Chankas have 9 wins and 0 losses, scoring 21 and conceding 10, whereas ADT have only 2 wins and 5 losses with a 11:15 record. Los Chankas have won all 5 of their last matches, averaging 3 points per game in that span, while ADT average 1 point (last 5: 1W, 2D, 2L). At home ADT generate more chances — on average 18.2 shots and 6.2 on target per game with xG 1.86 — but suffer from low efficiency (conversion 7%) and score only 1.2 goals per game; Los Chankas average 12.6 shots, 4.8 on target, conversion 13% and 1.6 goals on the road. Defensively the visitors look more effective: they concede 1.0 goals away on average with xG against 1.39, while ADT concede 1.4 at home with xG against 1.25, suggesting the visitors defend better than expected from chances conceded and the hosts concede more often than their xG suggests. Considering form, higher finishing efficiency and the fact Los Chankas have not failed to score away (0%), I rate their chances at 65% win, 20% draw and 15% for an ADT win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes: Los Chankas has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% versus ADT's 50%, and the league records 56% of matches with both teams scoring, which strongly favors both sides finding the net. In the last 5 matches ADT scored 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceded 7 (1.4), while Los Chankas scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) and conceded 4 (0.8), indicating superior attacking form from the visitors. Season averages show ADT scores 2.17 goals per match and Los Chankas concedes 1.0 per match, so the home side has a realistic chance to score against an opponent that allows goals. xG is similar: xG for ADT 1.33 vs 1.31 for Los Chankas, and xG against is 1.35-1.39; additionally, the home team has 5.17 shots on target vs 4.8 for the visitors with 12-12.6 total shots, confirming an exchange of scoring chances. Although ADT has 50% clean sheets, Los Chankas' 80% BTTS, the league 56% rate and the visitors' recent 10-4 form incline me to choose 'Yes' with a confidence split of 65% vs 35%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG-based model: ADT has an attacking xG of 1.33, while Los Chankas concedes an average xG of 1.39 — the mean of these values yields 1.36 expected goals for ADT. For Los Chankas the attacking xG is 1.31 and ADT concedes xG 1.35, giving 1.33 for the visitors; total expected goals sum to 2.69. With λ=2.69 the Poisson distribution gives roughly a 75% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which is supported by seasonal Over 1.5 rates: 67% for ADT and 80% for Los Chankas (average 73.5%). The chance for Over 2.5 is moderate (~50–51%, Poisson ~50.6%) and aligns with seasonal Over 2.5: 50% (ADT) vs 40% (Los Chankas). I assess Over 3.5 at about 29% (Poisson ~28.6%); although ADT has 50% of season matches >3.5, Los Chankas only 20%, therefore the recommendation is to play Over 1.5 as the strongest and most consistent signal (probability ~75%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
ADT averages 2.17 goals scored and 0.83 conceded per home match, while Los Chankas averages 1.6 scored and 1.0 conceded; additionally the home side’s shot conversion rate is 18% versus 13% for the visitors, supporting greater ADT efficiency from scoring opportunities. In the first half ADT averages 1.0 goals and only 0.33 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home=1.0, concededAVGHT_home=0.33) and led at the break in 3 of 6 home matches (50%), and, notably, has never been trailing at half-time at home (trailingAtHT_home=0.0), so the probability of the hosts losing the lead at the break is low. Los Chankas, however, is in excellent form (5 consecutive wins, form_l5_away='wwwww' and last5_winPercentage_overall_away=100%) and have led at the break in 3 of 5 away matches (60%), so I allow a solid share for the Half-Time draw / Full-Time home win variant. Given the balanced xG (1.33 vs 1.31) and similar shots on target (5.17 vs 4.8), the most likely scenario is 1/1 (38%), the second strongest is X/1 (28%), and scenarios where the hosts are losing at half-time (2/*) are collectively rated at 6%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| ADT | Los Chankas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Los Chankas is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - ADT · 3 pts / match - Los Chankas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Los Chankas is 91% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - ADT · 1.91 goals / match - Los Chankas
Los Chankas is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - ADT · 0.91 goals / match - Los Chankas
ADT scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Los Chankas keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).
Los Chankas scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while ADT keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ADT
Over / Under - Los Chankas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Los Chankas is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - ADT · 2 pts / match - Los Chankas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ADT - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Los Chankas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
ADT
Los Chankas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| ADT | Liga | Los Chankas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.36 | 2.71 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 54% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 66% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 80% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): ADT 1 - 1 - 0 Los Chankas. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of ADT vs Los Chankas?
The Primera División match finished ADT 4:0 Los Chankas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ADT and Los Chankas?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches ADT won 1, Los Chankas won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ADT vs Los Chankas?
ADT score 1.00 goals per game on average and Los Chankas 1.91. The Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of ADT's matches and 64% of Los Chankas's.
What form are ADT and Los Chankas in?
Over the last 5 games ADT have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Los Chankas 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ADT vs Los Chankas?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


