Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 28 October 2026

AEP Polemidion vs Ermis: match statistics

AEP Polemidion crest
AEP Polemidion
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Ermis crest
Ermis

AEP Polemidion vs Ermis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AEP Polemidion played Ermis in Second Division (Cyprus). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

AEP Polemidion: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Ermis: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

AEP Polemidion scores 0.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Ermis scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AEP Polemidion 0%, Ermis 50%. Over 2.5: AEP Polemidion 50%, Ermis 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Ermis has higher xG: 1.42 vs 0.78. AEP Polemidion: 2.0 shots per match, Ermis: 9.0.

Match halves

AEP Polemidion: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Ermis: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

AEP Polemidion: 76-90+ (1 goals). Ermis: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AEP Polemidion have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 8 goals, while Ermis have recorded 2 wins and scored 5. The hosts are therefore creating slightly more threat, although their defence has conceded 7 goals over this period, compared with 4 by the visitors. AEP are also backed by the only listed home fixture, which ended in a 1:0 win. However, the hosts’ advantage is not substantial: Ermis sit 8th in the table, with AEP 10th, and the data on scoring chances do not allow for a reliable comparison of their quality. Given these limitations, recent scoring form and home advantage support a cautious pick on AEP Polemidion.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams recorded BTTS in 40% of their last 5 matches, giving a slight edge to the scenario in which at least one team fails to score. Ermis averaged 1.0 goals per match over this period, with an xG of 0.92, so an away goal is far from certain despite AEP Polemidion conceding an average of 1.4 goals per match. On the other hand, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals, while Ermis conceded just 0.8 goals per match and allowed opponents an xG of 0.57. Ermis's away figures of 0.0 goals and 0.0 xG are inconsistent with its record over the last 5 matches, so I do not consider them a decisive factor. With both teams at 40% for BTTS in their last 5 matches and the visitors' defence having looked more solid recently, BTTS - No has a slight edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, AEP Polemidion averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Ermis averaged 1.0 scored and just 0.8 conceded. Although at least 3 goals were scored in 60% of AEP’s matches during this period, the figure for Ermis was only 20%, pointing against a high-scoring game. The hosts record an xG of 1.42 at home, while Ermis have limited their opponents to an average of 0.57 xG over their last 5 matches, so I do not expect AEP to score multiple goals with ease. The projected total of 2.30 goals is also below the league average of 2.69; therefore, Under 3.5 goals, with an 80% probability, is the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: Ermis were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while AEP Polemidion were level in 2 of 5; both teams averaged 0.4 goals before half-time over this period. The hosts failed to score in the first half in 4 of those 5 matches, making an early lead less likely than a later turnaround. After the break, AEP averaged 1.2 goals compared with Ermis’s 0.6, and won 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors recorded 2 wins. This points towards an X/1 scenario, although the visitors have conceded only 0.8 goals per match recently, so the hosts do not have a decisive edge. Ermis’s zero figures in the away statistics are not sufficient grounds to assume that the team poses no threat.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
AEP PolemidionErmis
10Shots5
AEP PolemidionErmis
3Shots on target3
AEP PolemidionErmis
1.2xG0.76
AEP PolemidionErmis
5Corners3
AEP PolemidionErmis
50Dangerous attacks31
AEP PolemidionErmis
10Fouls16
AEP PolemidionErmis
0Cards0
AEP PolemidionErmis

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match1.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
1.5Goals conceded / match1
AEP PolemidionErmis
25%Average possession56%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0.5Shots on target / match6.5
AEP PolemidionErmis

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2Shots per match9
AEP PolemidionErmis
0.5Shots on target6.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
25%Shot conversion16.7%
AEP PolemidionErmis
25%Possession56%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0.78xG for1.42
AEP PolemidionErmis
2.04xG against1.07
AEP PolemidionErmis

Shooting quality

AEP Polemidion: Counter-attackingErmis: Efficient finishing
AEP PolemidionErmis
Accuracy (shots on target)25%72%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.390.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AEP Polemidion
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 50%
Ermis
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ermis is 200% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - AEP Polemidion · 1.5 goals / match - Ermis

Ermis is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - AEP Polemidion · 1 goals / match - Ermis

AEP Polemidion scoring profile: mixed

AEP Polemidion scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Ermis keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Ermis scoring profile: very strong

Ermis scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while AEP Polemidion keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)3
AEP PolemidionErmis
3Goals conceded (season)2
AEP PolemidionErmis
2Average goals in match2.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
1Goals scored (last 5)3
AEP PolemidionErmis
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
AEP PolemidionErmis

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%2 goals50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%3 goals0%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%4 goals0%
AEP PolemidionErmis

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%2 goals50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%3 goals0%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%4 goals0%
AEP PolemidionErmis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%Scored in both halves50%
AEP PolemidionErmis

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%BTTS - last 550%
AEP PolemidionErmis

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AEP PolemidionErmis

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AEP PolemidionErmis
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AEP PolemidionErmis

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ermis is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - AEP Polemidion · 2 pts / match - Ermis

AEP Polemidion - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Ermis - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2
AEP PolemidionErmis
0Goals scored (1st half)1
AEP PolemidionErmis
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
100%No goal before half-time0%
AEP PolemidionErmis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AEP PolemidionErmis
1Average goals (2nd half)1
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AEP PolemidionErmis
50%No goal after half-time50%
AEP PolemidionErmis

AEP Polemidion - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ermis - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AEP Polemidion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ermis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AEP Polemidion
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ermis
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AEP Polemidion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Ermis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

AEP PolemidionLigaErmis
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.69▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 0%50%• 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 50%50%• 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%31%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%63%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%81%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

FAQ

What was the result of AEP Polemidion vs Ermis?

The Second Division match finished AEP Polemidion 0:1 Ermis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AEP Polemidion vs Ermis?

AEP Polemidion score 0.50 goals per game on average and Ermis 1.50. The Second Division average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 0% of AEP Polemidion's matches and 50% of Ermis's.

What form are AEP Polemidion and Ermis in?

Over the last 5 games AEP Polemidion have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Ermis 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AEP Polemidion vs Ermis?

The statistical background for AEP Polemidion vs Ermis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.