England - EFL League OneCherry Red Records StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

AFC Wimbledon vs Doncaster Rovers: match statistics

AFC Wimbledon vs Doncaster Rovers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AFC Wimbledon played Doncaster Rovers in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Cherry Red Records Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

AFC Wimbledon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Doncaster Rovers: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

AFC Wimbledon scores 0.80 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Doncaster Rovers scores 1.20 and concedes 1.60. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AFC Wimbledon 20%, Doncaster Rovers 80%. Over 2.5: AFC Wimbledon 40%, Doncaster Rovers 60%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Doncaster Rovers has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.28. AFC Wimbledon: 11.2 shots per match, Doncaster Rovers: 13.0.

Match halves

AFC Wimbledon: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Doncaster Rovers: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

AFC Wimbledon: 0-15 (1 goals). Doncaster Rovers: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AFC Wimbledon have a clearly superior recent record: they have collected 7 points from their last 5 matches, recording 2 wins and a draw, while Doncaster Rovers have registered 3 draws and 2 defeats, earning just 3 points. The hosts are unbeaten at home, have won 50% of their matches and kept a clean sheet in 100% of them, which contrasts sharply with Doncaster conceding an average of 2 goals away from home and failing to keep a clean sheet. The visitors create slightly more on the road, averaging 10.5 shots and 4 on target per match compared with Wimbledon's 8.5 and 2, and they have also scored in every away fixture. However, their defence looks error-prone: their average xG against stands at 1.44, and they have conceded 9 goals in their last 5 matches. Home advantage and a significantly more solid defence point towards a narrow AFC Wimbledon victory, although the visitors' attacking numbers increase the risk of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both sides to score is clear in the season data: AFC Wimbledon have recorded BTTS in 67% of matches, while Doncaster Rovers are at an impressive 100%. The visitors have yet to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Wimbledon generate an average of 1.42 xG and register 14.67 shots. Doncaster score an average of 1.5 goals, record 4.0 shots on target per match, and face a home defence that concedes 1.33 goals and 1.60 xG. Wimbledon's last five matches reduce confidence in the pick, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of cases, but Doncaster have recorded 80% BTTS over the same period and concede an average of 1.8 goals. The balance of evidence still favours a scenario in which both teams score at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to approximately 2.67 goals, as Wimbledon generate an average of 1.42 xG, while Doncaster allow opponents 1.44 xG. The visitors score an average of 1.50 goals away from home, while the hosts concede 1.33 goals, and Doncaster have also yet to keep a clean sheet. At least 2 goals have been scored in 67% of Wimbledon's matches and in all of Doncaster's games, which strongly supports Over 1.5. In their last five matches, both teams have averaged 2.60 goals per game combined, although Wimbledon's finishing reduces confidence in the Over 2.5 option. Therefore, Over 1.5 is the strongest selection: it provides protection against a tighter match scenario while both defences still carry significant potential to concede.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches, while Doncaster scored just 0.2 goals before the break during this period. AFC Wimbledon have slightly stronger grounds for taking control after the restart: over their last five league matches, they averaged 1.4 points per game compared with Doncaster’s 0.6, and the visitors failed to win any of those fixtures. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with their average xG standing at 1.42, while Doncaster generate 1.17 xG. The visitors’ defence has conceded an average of 1.8 goals across their last five matches and 1.4 goals after half-time, which supports a second-half turnaround in Wimbledon’s favour. The X/1 scenario receives the highest rating, although Doncaster’s high attacking output after the break, averaging 1.0 goals scored, leaves a significant risk of a draw or an away win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
11Shots22
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
3Shots on target9
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1.2xG2.36
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
6Corners6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
41Dangerous attacks48
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
15Fouls6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
2Cards3
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0.8Goals scored / match1.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1.4Goals conceded / match1.6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
49%Average possession50%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
2.6Shots on target / match3.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.2Shots per match13
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
2.6Shots on target3.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
7.1%Shot conversion9.2%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
49%Possession50%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1.28xG for1.32
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1.25xG against1.53
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

Shooting quality

AFC Wimbledon: BalancedDoncaster Rovers: Balanced
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
Accuracy (shots on target)23%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AFC Wimbledon is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - AFC Wimbledon · 0.6 pts / match - Doncaster Rovers

AFC Wimbledon
LDWLW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Doncaster Rovers
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Doncaster Rovers is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon · 1.2 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers

AFC Wimbledon is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon · 1.6 goals / match - Doncaster Rovers

AFC Wimbledon scoring profile: strong

AFC Wimbledon scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Doncaster Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Doncaster Rovers scoring profile: mixed

Doncaster Rovers scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
7Goals conceded (season)8
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
2.2Average goals in match2.8
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
4Goals scored (last 5)6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%2 goals40%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0%3 goals0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0%4 goals0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
40%2 goals60%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
40%3 goals20%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%4 goals0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%Scored in both halves0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%BTTS - last 580%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AFC Wimbledon - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Doncaster Rovers - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.6
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
60%No goal before half-time80%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.8
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)1
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
1Average goals (2nd half)2.2
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
60%Clean sheet after half-time20%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers
60%No goal after half-time40%
AFC WimbledonDoncaster Rovers

AFC Wimbledon - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Doncaster Rovers - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AFC Wimbledon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Doncaster Rovers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.62.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AFC Wimbledon
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Doncaster Rovers
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AFC Wimbledon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Doncaster Rovers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

AFC WimbledonLigaDoncaster Rovers
Average goals in match▼ 2.203.16▼ 2.80
Both teams scored▼ 20%66%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%61%• 60%
Clean sheets▲ 60%20%• 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%68%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%84%▼ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Doncaster RoversSubstitutionOn: Sean GrehanOff: Matthew Pearson
  2. AFC WimbledonYellow cardJayden Stockley
  3. Doncaster RoversYellow cardLeon Ayinde
  4. AFC WimbledonGoalMyles Hippolyte
  5. Doncaster RoversSubstitutionOn: Isaac HutchinsonOff: George Broadbent
  6. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Andy YiadomOff: Freddie Simmonds
  7. Doncaster RoversYellow cardOwen John Edward Bailey
  8. AFC WimbledonYellow cardMyles Hippolyte
  9. Doncaster RoversYellow cardTommy Simkim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): AFC Wimbledon 1 - 0 - 1 Doncaster Rovers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

AFC Wimbledon
0 : 1
Doncaster Rovers FC
Doncaster Rovers FC
1 : 2
AFC Wimbledon

FAQ

What was the result of AFC Wimbledon vs Doncaster Rovers?

The EFL League One match finished AFC Wimbledon 1:0 Doncaster Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AFC Wimbledon and Doncaster Rovers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches AFC Wimbledon won 1, Doncaster Rovers won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AFC Wimbledon vs Doncaster Rovers?

AFC Wimbledon score 0.80 goals per game on average and Doncaster Rovers 1.20. The EFL League One average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 20% of AFC Wimbledon's matches and 80% of Doncaster Rovers's.

What form are AFC Wimbledon and Doncaster Rovers in?

Over the last 5 games AFC Wimbledon have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Doncaster Rovers 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AFC Wimbledon vs Doncaster Rovers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.