AGF vs Nordsjælland: match statistics
AGF vs Nordsjælland: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AGF played Nordsjælland in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 10 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
AGF: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Nordsjælland: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
AGF scores 1.96 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Nordsjælland scores 1.68 and concedes 1.60. League average: 3.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AGF 72%, Nordsjælland 48%. Over 2.5: AGF 56%, Nordsjælland 68%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
AGF has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.59. AGF: 15.9 shots per match, Nordsjælland: 13.0.
Match halves
AGF: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 1.00. Nordsjælland: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.96.
Goals by minute
AGF: 61-75 (11 goals). Nordsjælland: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AGF are favorites in this matchup due to a clear defensive edge and superior chance production — hosts concede 0.83 goals per home game versus Nordsjælland’s 2.08 goals conceded away, and AGF’s home goal difference is +12. In attack AGF average 1.83 goals at home with 18.5 shots and 6.58 on target and an average xG of 2.21, while the visitors score 1.33 goals away with 11.5 shots, 4.5 on target and xG 1.38 — meaning the hosts have approximately 0.83 higher xG and about 7 more shots per match. Nordsjælland’s finishing rate is slightly higher (12% vs 10%), but the visitors fail to score in 33% of away games, whereas AGF fail to score in only 17% of home matches, which favors the hosts’ greater reliability. Last 5 form shows Nordsjælland with 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game) and AGF with 2 wins and 3 draws (1.8 points per game); however AGF’s home metrics (67% win rate and 50% clean sheets) give them the edge and I back a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes at 68% (vs 32%) because recent form and stats favor both teams scoring. AGF averages 2.00 goals at home this season with xG 1.79, while Nordsjælland concedes 2.08 goals away with xG against 1.60 — indicating AGF will create chances and is likely to score. Nordsjælland averages 1.33 goals on the road and has scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg), and their away clean sheet percentage is only 17%, which increases the likelihood of them finding the net. Additionally, AGF had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, Nordsjælland in 60%, and the league has 59% BTTS matches, so the combined picture (2.00 vs 2.08, 1.79 xG vs 1.60 xG against, 80% and 60%) clearly supports the Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
AGF scores on average 2.00 goals per season (xG 1.79) and concedes 1.15, while Nordsjælland scores 1.33 goals (xG 1.38) and concedes 2.08, suggesting an offensive game with a vulnerable away defense. A simple model combining attack and defense (average xG for/against) yields expected xG of 1.70 for AGF and 1.29 for Nordsjælland, totalling 2.99 expected goals — consistent with the 3.0 goals average in the last 5 matches (6 goals AGF and 9 Nordsjælland). Season Over1.5 rates are 69% for AGF and 83% for Nordsjælland (average 76%), Over2.5 is 62% vs 75% (average 69%), and Over3.5 38% vs 33% (average 36%), indicating the strongest signal for >1.5 and a solid signal for >2.5. Additionally AGF averages 14.38 shots with 6.46 on target at a 14% conversion rate, while Nordsjælland averages 11.5 shots with 4.5 on target at 12% — these figures support chance creation and confirm xG close to 3.0. Consequently I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest pick; Over 2.5 can be considered as a secondary option, while Over 3.5 appears less likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
AGF has a clear advantage in first-half metrics: they led at the break in 7 matches (54%) and kept a first-half clean sheet in 85% of games, whereas Nordsjælland led at the break in only 2 matches (17%) and conceded an average of 1.08 goals by half-time. Over the full match, the home side scores an average of 2.0 goals with an xG of 1.79 versus 1.33 goals and xG 1.38 for the visitors, and Nordsjælland concedes an average of 2.08 goals per game, giving AGF the edge in chance creation and finishing. AGF registers 6.46 shots on target per match compared to Nordsjælland’s 4.5 and has a higher conversion rate (14% vs 12%), which further supports a home-side lead scenario. First-half statistics confirm this: AGF averages 0.85 goals scored and concedes 0.15 by half-time, while the visitors average 0.58 scored and 1.08 conceded at the break; therefore the most likely scenario is AGF leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AGF | Nordsjælland | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AGF is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - AGF · 2 pts / match - Nordsjælland
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AGF is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.96 goals / match - AGF · 1.68 goals / match - Nordsjælland
AGF is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - AGF · 1.6 goals / match - Nordsjælland
AGF scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Nordsjælland keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).
Nordsjælland scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AGF
Over / Under - Nordsjælland
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / match - AGF · 1.4 pts / match - Nordsjælland
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AGF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nordsjælland - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AGF
Nordsjælland
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| AGF | Liga | Nordsjælland | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.96 | 3.07 | ▲ 3.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 59% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 74% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): AGF 2 - 0 - 0 Nordsjælland. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AGF vs Nordsjælland?
The Superliga match finished AGF 1:1 Nordsjælland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between AGF and Nordsjælland?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches AGF won 2, Nordsjælland won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before AGF vs Nordsjælland?
AGF score 1.96 goals per game on average and Nordsjælland 1.68. The Superliga average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 72% of AGF's matches and 48% of Nordsjælland's.
What form are AGF and Nordsjælland in?
Over the last 5 games AGF have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Nordsjælland 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGF vs Nordsjælland?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


