AGF vs SønderjyskE: match statistics
AGF vs SønderjyskE: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AGF played SønderjyskE in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
AGF: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. SønderjyskE: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
AGF scores 1.79 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. SønderjyskE scores 1.41 and concedes 1.48. League average: 3.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AGF 72%, SønderjyskE 55%. Over 2.5: AGF 52%, SønderjyskE 55%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
AGF has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.39. AGF: 15.9 shots per match, SønderjyskE: 12.3.
Match halves
AGF: half-time lead 62%, second-half goals 0.90. SønderjyskE: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
AGF: 61-75 (11 goals). SønderjyskE: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AGF are the match favourites: at home they win 57% of matches, keep a clean sheet in 50% of games and score on average 1.64 goals per match with an average xG of 2.19, totaling 52 goals this season. The hosts create significantly more chances — on average 18.57 shots and 6.36 on target at home versus SønderjyskE’s 11.79 shots and 3.93 on target away, with the visitors’ away xG at 1.34. Defensively the gap is clear: AGF concede on average 0.79 goals at home, while SønderjyskE concede 1.93 away and have conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches versus AGF’s 5 conceded in the same period. Additionally the visitors fail to score in 36% of away matches and have lower possession (45% vs 60%), which limits their chances of turning the game around. Based on this I assess the probability of a home win at about 65%, a draw 20% and an away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators favor both teams scoring: AGF has BTTS at 60%, SønderjyskE 50%, and the league average is 60%, which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. AGF averages 1.6 goals scored and concedes 1.07 per match, while SønderjyskE scores 1.21 and concedes 1.93; additionally SønderjyskE has conceded 2.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches (12 goals), increasing the chance for AGF to score. In the last 5 matches AGF had BTTS in 80% (4 of 5), and SønderjyskE in 40% (2 of 5), yet SønderjyskE scored 6 goals in those 5 matches (1.2 per match), so they have realistic potential to score away. xG and chance-creation stats also point to goals: AGF has xG_for 1.44 with 12.87 shots and 4.2 shots on target, and SønderjyskE xG_for 1.34 with 11.79 shots and 3.93 shots on target, suggesting both teams generate chances. In summary, combining seasonal BTTS 60%/50%, AGF’s high BTTS involvement in the last 5 matches (80%) and SønderjyskE’s defensive weakness (1.93 conceded on the season and 2.4 in the last 5), I pick BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of about 70% versus 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals were calculated as the average of the home attack and away defense: (xG_for_home 1.44 + xG_against_away 1.70)/2 = 1.57 for AGF and (xG_for_away 1.34 + xG_against_home 1.56)/2 = 1.45 for SønderjyskE, totaling 3.02. A Poisson model for the sum μ=3.02 yields probabilities of over 1.5 around 80%, over 2.5 around 58% and over 3.5 around 36%. Season data support this: AGF have 60% of home matches over 2.5, SønderjyskE 50% on the road, and the league average is 3.04 goals per game. Additionally, AGF score on average 1.6 goals from 12.87 shots with 12% conversion, while SønderjyskE average 1.21 goals from 11.79 shots with 10% conversion, and seasonal shares over 1.5 are 87% and 79% respectively, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
AGF hold a home advantage: they average 1.6 goals at home versus SønderjyskE’s 1.21 away, their xG is 1.44 against the visitors’ 1.34, and shot conversion is 12% vs 10%, which translates into 53% home wins (vs 21% away wins for visitors). At Half-Time draws predominate — AGF are level at the break in 53% of home matches, SønderjyskE in 43% of away games, giving roughly a 48% chance of a draw after 45 minutes; however the home side lead at the break in 27% of matches, while the visitors are trailing in 43% of their away fixtures, which together suggests ~35% probability of AGF leading at Half-Time. In the second half AGF score on average 0.93 and concede 0.6, whereas SønderjyskE score 0.79 and concede 1.07, so hosts more often produce a turnaround after the break and I estimate that a Half-Time draw has about a 55% chance to convert into an AGF win. On that basis the most likely HT/FT is draw/host win (X/1) at 27% probability, slightly behind is home lead and home win 1/1 (26%), with the remaining scenarios having lower single-digit percentage chances.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AGF | SønderjyskE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AGF is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - AGF · 0.8 pts / match - SønderjyskE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AGF is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - AGF · 1.41 goals / match - SønderjyskE
AGF is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - AGF · 1.48 goals / match - SønderjyskE
AGF scores in 90% of matches (26 of 29 matches), while SønderjyskE keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
SønderjyskE scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AGF
Over / Under - SønderjyskE
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.14 pts / match - AGF · 1.1 pts / match - SønderjyskE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AGF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 62% of matches and wins 55%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
SønderjyskE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AGF
SønderjyskE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| AGF | Liga | SønderjyskE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.79 | 3.06 | ▼ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 74% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 79% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): AGF 0 - 2 - 1 SønderjyskE. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AGF vs SønderjyskE?
The Superliga match finished AGF 2:1 SønderjyskE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between AGF and SønderjyskE?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches AGF won 0, SønderjyskE won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before AGF vs SønderjyskE?
AGF score 1.79 goals per game on average and SønderjyskE 1.41. The Superliga average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 72% of AGF's matches and 55% of SønderjyskE's.
What form are AGF and SønderjyskE in?
Over the last 5 games AGF have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and SønderjyskE 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGF vs SønderjyskE?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


