Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

AGMK vs Buxoro: match statistics

AGMK crest
AGMK
3 : 2half-time 2:2
Buxoro crest
Buxoro

AGMK vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AGMK played Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

AGMK: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Buxoro: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

AGMK scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Buxoro scores 1.43 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AGMK 57%, Buxoro 57%. Over 2.5: AGMK 43%, Buxoro 29%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Buxoro has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.29. AGMK: 10.3 shots per match, Buxoro: 11.3.

Match halves

AGMK: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.43. Buxoro: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

AGMK: 31-45+ (2 goals). Buxoro: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win for Buxoro. The numbers support this: Buxoro sits 4th in the table versus AGMK’s 9th, has 4 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 2, and has scored 10 goals versus 7. Additionally, the visitors have conceded only 6 goals this season versus 9 for AGMK, and away they haven’t had a match without scoring (0% matches without a goal), while AGMK have yet to win at home (0% home wins) and failed to score in 33% of their home games. On the other hand, AGMK create more chances at home — home xG is 1.57 with an average of 4.67 shots on target per match versus Buxoro’s 1.10 xG and 3.0 shots on target on the road — which suggests the hosts can be dangerous. Both teams share the same average points over the last 5 matches (1.6 points per game), but the better win and goal record of the visitors (4 wins; goal difference 10–6) leads me to predict a narrow Buxoro victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong BTTS signal stems from form: both AGMK and Buxoro have 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches, while seasonally Buxoro records 67% BTTS versus AGMK’s 50%. Goal-related metrics show AGMK generates 1.51 xG and 5.5 shots on target per match with a 15% conversion, whereas Buxoro posts 1.10 xG and only 3.0 shots on target with a 9% conversion; simultaneously Buxoro concedes 1.33 goals away with an xG against of 1.59. Although AGMK has a low seasonal home goals-against average of 0.5 and 50% clean sheets expected, in the last 5 matches the home side has conceded 1.4 on average and scored 1.4, which increases the likelihood both teams score. Considering the combined offensive xG of 2.61 (1.51+1.10), the league average goals of 2.45 and recent 80% BTTS runs, I rate the “BTTS - Yes” scenario at 75% versus 25% for “No Goal.”

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and form analysis suggest a combined expected goals total of around 2.75: home xG is 1.51 versus Buxoro’s defensive average xG conceded of 1.59 (forecast for AGMK ≈1.55), while Buxoro xG is 1.10 against AGMK’s defense 1.30 giving ≈1.20; sum ≈2.75. AGMK scores on average 1.75 goals this season, records 5.5 shots on target and has a 15% conversion rate, whereas Buxoro has 1.0 goals, 3.0 shots on target and 9% conversion — this increases the likelihood of home goals. Season-to-date Over 1.5 rates are 75% (AGMK) and 67% (Buxoro), and a Poisson model with λ=2.75 yields Over 1.5 ≈76%, hence high confidence for Over 1.5. Over 2.5 shows mixed signals (seasonal 25%/33%), but AGMK’s last 5 matches show 60% Over 2.5, which together with projected xG raises the chance to about 52%. Over 3.5 looks unlikely (seasonal Over 3.5 25%/33% and forecast 2.75 < 3.5), so the best bet is the Over line at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The hosts led at half-time in 3 of their 4 home matches (75%) and average 0.75 goals by the break while conceding 0.25, whereas Buxoro have never led at half-time on the road (0%) and drew in 2 of 3 away fixtures (67%). Over 90 minutes AGMK win 75% of home games, score an average of 1.75 goals and concede 0.5, and their xG is 1.51 versus the visitors’ 1.10, giving the hosts a qualitative advantage. Additionally the hosts have more shots on target (5.5 vs 3.0) and a higher conversion rate (15% conversion versus Buxoro’s 9%), which increases the chance of maintaining a lead at the break. On this basis the most likely scenario is the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1) — I assign it a 43% probability; alternatives are a half-time draw with a later home win (X/1, 15%) or draw/draw (X/X, 14%), since a draw at half is common for Buxoro but AGMK’s overall strength favors a turnaround in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
AGMKBuxoro
17Shots13
AGMKBuxoro
5Shots on target6
AGMKBuxoro
1.97xG1.73
AGMKBuxoro
10Corners8
AGMKBuxoro
78Dangerous attacks69
AGMKBuxoro
8Fouls15
AGMKBuxoro
1Cards5
AGMKBuxoro

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.43
AGMKBuxoro
1.29Goals conceded / match0.86
AGMKBuxoro
47%Average possession45%
AGMKBuxoro
3.14Shots on target / match4.43
AGMKBuxoro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.29Shots per match11.29
AGMKBuxoro
3.14Shots on target4.43
AGMKBuxoro
9.7%Shot conversion12.7%
AGMKBuxoro
47%Possession45%
AGMKBuxoro
1.29xG for1.33
AGMKBuxoro
1.44xG against1.42
AGMKBuxoro

Shooting quality

AGMK: BalancedBuxoro: Counter-attacking
AGMKBuxoro
Accuracy (shots on target)31%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AGMK
DWLDW
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
LDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Buxoro
DWLWD
Season result split
57% W29% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
WLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Buxoro is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - AGMK · 1.43 goals / match - Buxoro

Buxoro is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - AGMK · 0.86 goals / match - Buxoro

AGMK scoring profile: strong

AGMK scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Buxoro scoring profile: very strong

Buxoro scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

7Goals scored (season)10
AGMKBuxoro
9Goals conceded (season)6
AGMKBuxoro
2.29Average goals in match2.29
AGMKBuxoro
7Goals scored (last 5)8
AGMKBuxoro
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
AGMKBuxoro

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal100%
AGMKBuxoro
29%2 goals29%
AGMKBuxoro
0%3 goals14%
AGMKBuxoro
0%4 goals0%
AGMKBuxoro

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
AGMKBuxoro
29%2 goals14%
AGMKBuxoro
14%3 goals14%
AGMKBuxoro
0%4 goals0%
AGMKBuxoro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time14%
AGMKBuxoro
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AGMKBuxoro
0%Scored in both halves14%
AGMKBuxoro

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
AGMKBuxoro
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AGMKBuxoro
80%BTTS - last 580%
AGMKBuxoro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
AGMKBuxoro
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
AGMKBuxoro
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
AGMKBuxoro

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
AGMKBuxoro
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
AGMKBuxoro
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AGMKBuxoro

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGMK - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing
Buxoro - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.57
AGMKBuxoro
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.57
AGMKBuxoro
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
AGMKBuxoro
1Average goals (1st half)1.14
AGMKBuxoro
71%Clean sheet before half-time71%
AGMKBuxoro
57%No goal before half-time43%
AGMKBuxoro

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)1.71
AGMKBuxoro
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
AGMKBuxoro
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
AGMKBuxoro
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.14
AGMKBuxoro
14%Clean sheet after half-time71%
AGMKBuxoro
71%No goal after half-time43%
AGMKBuxoro

AGMK - second-half results

14% W29% R57% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Buxoro - second-half results

43% W43% R14% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AGMK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Buxoro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Buxoro
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Buxoro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AGMKLigaBuxoro
Average goals in match 2.292.44 2.29
Both teams scored 57%49% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%47% 29%
Clean sheets 14%27% 43%
Goal before half-time 71%70% 71%
Goal after half-time 86%79% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BuxoroYellow cardVeljko Filipović
  2. BuxoroYellow cardUmid Khamraev
  3. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Asadbek SobirjonovOff: Aziz Kholmurodov
  4. BuxoroYellow cardVladimir Rodić
  5. BuxoroYellow cardBojan Mlađović
  6. BuxoroYellow cardKhurshidbek Mukhtarov
  7. BuxoroSubstitutionOn: Asadbek JuraboyevOff: Javokhir Ro'ziyev
  8. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Shahzod ToirovOff: Siavash Haghnazari
  9. AGMKYellow cardNodirbek Abdurazzoqov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): AGMK 2 - 0 - 0 Buxoro. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Buxoro FK
0 : 2
FK AGMK
FK AGMK
2 : 1
Buxoro FK

FAQ

What was the result of AGMK vs Buxoro?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished AGMK 3:2 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGMK and Buxoro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches AGMK won 2, Buxoro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGMK vs Buxoro?

AGMK score 1.00 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.43. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 57% of AGMK's matches and 57% of Buxoro's.

What form are AGMK and Buxoro in?

Over the last 5 games AGMK have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Buxoro 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGMK vs Buxoro?

The statistical background for AGMK vs Buxoro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.