Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueOKMK Sport MajmuasiData current as of 22 October 2026

AGMK vs Pakhtakor: match statistics

AGMK crest
AGMK
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor

AGMK vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AGMK played Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 9 September 2026. Venue: OKMK Sport Majmuasi. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

AGMK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Pakhtakor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

AGMK scores 1.40 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Pakhtakor scores 1.70 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AGMK 60%, Pakhtakor 60%. Over 2.5: AGMK 55%, Pakhtakor 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

AGMK has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.50. AGMK: 12.9 shots per match, Pakhtakor: 12.9.

Match halves

AGMK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.80. Pakhtakor: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

AGMK: 31-45+ (6 goals). Pakhtakor: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pakhtakor sit 2nd, while AGMK are sixth, and the visitors’ season record shows just 1 defeat in 20 matches compared with 6 defeats for the hosts. Away from home, Pakhtakor are unbeaten, winning 67% of their matches, while averaging 1.44 goals scored and just 0.67 conceded per game. AGMK average 1.20 goals at home but fail to score in 30% of matches, whereas the visitors have failed to find the net in only 11% of their away fixtures. Pakhtakor’s defence keeps a clean sheet in 44% of away matches, significantly more often than AGMK at home (20%), and have conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, compared with 5 for the hosts. AGMK do create more quality at home, with an average xG of 1.77 compared with their opponents’ 1.42, but the visitors’ superior finishing efficiency (11% versus 9%) and defensive stability point to a narrow Pakhtakor victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Long-term BTTS indicators are moderately high, standing at 64% for AGMK and 56% for Pakhtakor, but recent form clearly weakens this signal. In their last 5 matches, AGMK scored only 0.8 goals per game, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of their fixtures. Pakhtakor conceded only 0.6 goals per match during this period and kept a clean sheet in 44% of their games throughout the season, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will fail to score. Although AGMK have recently created chances worth an average of 1.49 xG, the visitors’ solid defence and their 40% BTTS rate across their last five matches support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projection of 2.26 goals is based on a combination of solid defensive records and recent form: AGMK conceded an average of 1.0 goals across their last five matches, while Pakhtakor conceded just 0.6. During this period, the hosts scored only 0.8 goals per game, compared with 1.2 for the visitors, clearly reducing their attacking potential relative to their season averages of 1.91 and 1.44. The xG figures from the last five matches are also moderate, standing at 1.49 for AGMK and 1.28 for Pakhtakor, with their opponents recording 1.18 and 1.01 xG respectively. Only 11% of Pakhtakor's matches and 36% of AGMK's matches this season finished with Over 3.5 goals, and neither team allowed opponents to score at least three goals. The strongest option is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the data points more towards a 1:1 or 1:0 result than an open, high-scoring game featuring four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time, followed by Pakhtakor turning the game in their favour. The visitors were level at the break in 56% of their matches this season and in 60% of their last five, while they have not conceded a single first-half goal during that recent run. AGMK usually start strongly, leading at the break in 55% of matches and averaging 1.18 goals in the first half, although that figure has dropped to 0.8 goals across their last five outings. Pakhtakor remain unbeaten in the competition, have won 67% of their matches and have not suffered a single second-half defeat, whereas AGMK lose the second half in 45% of their games. In addition, the hosts have failed to score after the break in each of their last five matches, reinforcing the scenario in which the more patient visitors settle the contest after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
AGMKPakhtakor
16Shots8
AGMKPakhtakor
4Shots on target5
AGMKPakhtakor
1.97xG1.28
AGMKPakhtakor
10Corners1
AGMKPakhtakor
96Dangerous attacks57
AGMKPakhtakor
15Fouls13
AGMKPakhtakor
1Cards2
AGMKPakhtakor

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match1.7
AGMKPakhtakor
1.25Goals conceded / match0.9
AGMKPakhtakor
51%Average possession57%
AGMKPakhtakor
4.3Shots on target / match4.35
AGMKPakhtakor

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.95Shots per match12.9
AGMKPakhtakor
4.3Shots on target4.35
AGMKPakhtakor
10.8%Shot conversion13.2%
AGMKPakhtakor
51%Possession57%
AGMKPakhtakor
1.63xG for1.5
AGMKPakhtakor
1.32xG against1.18
AGMKPakhtakor

Shooting quality

AGMK: BalancedPakhtakor: Efficient finishing
AGMKPakhtakor
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pakhtakor is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - AGMK · 1.8 pts / match - Pakhtakor

AGMK
WLLDW
Season result split
45% W25% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-6
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Pakhtakor
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W35% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-1
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - AGMK · 1.7 goals / match - Pakhtakor

Pakhtakor is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - AGMK · 0.9 goals / match - Pakhtakor

AGMK scoring profile: strong

AGMK scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 matches).

Pakhtakor scoring profile: very strong

Pakhtakor scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

28Goals scored (season)34
AGMKPakhtakor
25Goals conceded (season)18
AGMKPakhtakor
2.65Average goals in match2.6
AGMKPakhtakor
4Goals scored (last 5)8
AGMKPakhtakor
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
AGMKPakhtakor

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal85%
AGMKPakhtakor
45%2 goals55%
AGMKPakhtakor
20%3 goals20%
AGMKPakhtakor
5%4 goals10%
AGMKPakhtakor

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal65%
AGMKPakhtakor
40%2 goals25%
AGMKPakhtakor
5%3 goals0%
AGMKPakhtakor
0%4 goals0%
AGMKPakhtakor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time15%
AGMKPakhtakor
0%BTTS in both halves5%
AGMKPakhtakor
15%Scored in both halves35%
AGMKPakhtakor

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
AGMKPakhtakor
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
AGMKPakhtakor
20%BTTS - last 560%
AGMKPakhtakor

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
AGMKPakhtakor
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
AGMKPakhtakor
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AGMKPakhtakor

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
AGMKPakhtakor
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
AGMKPakhtakor
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AGMKPakhtakor

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - AGMK · 1.85 pts / match - Pakhtakor

AGMK - half-time state
25% leading45% draw30% trailing
Pakhtakor - half-time state
45% leading50% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.85
AGMKPakhtakor
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.85
AGMKPakhtakor
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
AGMKPakhtakor
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.1
AGMKPakhtakor
55%Clean sheet before half-time80%
AGMKPakhtakor
60%No goal before half-time40%
AGMKPakhtakor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.55
AGMKPakhtakor
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
AGMKPakhtakor
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
AGMKPakhtakor
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.5
AGMKPakhtakor
40%Clean sheet after half-time50%
AGMKPakhtakor
55%No goal after half-time40%
AGMKPakhtakor

AGMK - second-half results

35% W30% D35% L
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding180%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pakhtakor - second-half results

40% W35% D25% L
37
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AGMK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Pakhtakor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
8
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
7
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AGMKLigaPakhtakor
Average goals in match• 2.652.64• 2.60
Both teams scored▲ 60%54%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%51%• 50%
Clean sheets▼ 20%27%▲ 35%
Goal before half-time▼ 65%68%▼ 65%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%76%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PakhtakorGoalAymen HusseinAssist: Dilshod Saitov
  2. PakhtakorGoalIbrokhim IbragimovAssist: Aymen Hussein
  3. AGMKYellow cardShahzod Toirov
  4. PakhtakorYellow cardIbrokhim Ibragimov
  5. PakhtakorSubstitutionOn: Sherzod NasrullayevOff: Dostonbek Khamdamov
  6. PakhtakorYellow cardSardor Sabirkhodjaev
  7. PakhtakorSubstitutionOn: Davron TulaganovOff: Aymen Hussein
  8. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Ivan PešićOff: Asadbek Sobirjonov

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): AGMK 2 - 0 - 1 Pakhtakor. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Pakhtakor
3 : 1
AGMK
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
1 : 2
FK AGMK
FK AGMK
2 : 0
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent

FAQ

What was the result of AGMK vs Pakhtakor?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished AGMK 1:3 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGMK and Pakhtakor?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches AGMK won 2, Pakhtakor won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGMK vs Pakhtakor?

AGMK score 1.40 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.70. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of AGMK's matches and 60% of Pakhtakor's.

What form are AGMK and Pakhtakor in?

Over the last 5 games AGMK have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Pakhtakor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGMK vs Pakhtakor?

The statistical background for AGMK vs Pakhtakor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.