Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueOKMK Sport MajmuasiData current as of 15 October 2026

AGMK vs Xorazm: match statistics

AGMK crest
AGMK
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Xorazm crest
Xorazm

AGMK vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AGMK played Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 3 September 2026. Venue: OKMK Sport Majmuasi. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

AGMK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Xorazm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

AGMK scores 1.42 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Xorazm scores 0.89 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AGMK 63%, Xorazm 47%. Over 2.5: AGMK 58%, Xorazm 42%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

AGMK has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.01. AGMK: 12.8 shots per match, Xorazm: 7.7.

Match halves

AGMK: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.84. Xorazm: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

AGMK: 31-45+ (6 goals). Xorazm: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AGMK sit 6th, while Xorazm are only 13th, and the hosts have won 8 matches this season compared with the visitors’ 5 victories. At home, AGMK create significantly more chances, averaging 13.11 shots and an xG of 1.74, compared with Xorazm’s mere 6.1 shots and xG of 0.87 away from home. The visitors score just 0.70 goals per away match, have failed to find the net in 40% of such fixtures, and have lost 50% of their away games. Xorazm’s defence also allows opponents chances worth an average of 1.74 xG and concedes 1.50 goals per match, which further favours the hosts. Both teams have won only 1 of their last 5 matches, but AGMK boast stronger home numbers and should make the most of home advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate stands at 44% for AGMK and 50% for Xorazm, meaning that in neither case does it clearly exceed the scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Xorazm averages just 0.70 goals per match, has an xG of 0.87, and failed to score in 40% of their games, which significantly reduces the visitors’ chances of finding the net. AGMK are also not a team that scores consistently, having scored 4 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.8 per game, while BTTS landed in only 40% of those fixtures. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, whereas Xorazm have finished without scoring in as many as 40% of their appearances. Although the visitors’ defence has conceded an average of 2.2 goals recently, a result featuring goals only from AGMK is more likely than a Goal/Goal outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

AGMK average 1.11 goals, while Xorazm concede 1.50 away from home; however, the hosts have scored just 0.8 goals per match across their last five fixtures. The visitors have a season average of only 0.70 goals, although AGMK’s defense allows an average of 1.44 goals conceded. The hosts’ attacking potential has recently risen to 1.95 xG, while Xorazm allowed 1.92 xG over the same period, supporting a 2-3 goal scenario rather than a high-scoring game. The 3.5 line was not covered in 78% of AGMK matches and 80% of Xorazm fixtures, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Xorazm were level at the break in 60% of their matches, compared with 33% for AGMK, while averaging just 0.56 goals scored by the home side and 0.30 by the visitors in the first half. AGMK nevertheless have the clearer potential for a full-time win: they won 44% of their matches this season, compared with 10% for Xorazm, and their average xG stands at 1.17 versus 0.87 for the visitors. Xorazm’s defence allows opponents an average of 1.74 xG and concedes 1.50 goals per match, while AGMK average 9.44 shots compared with 6.10 for their opponents. After the break, the visitors lost 60% of their second-half segments, while the hosts averaged 1.33 points per match in those periods, supporting a scenario in which the game is decided after an evenly contested start. AGMK’s weaker recent form, with just 0.8 goals scored per match across their last five appearances, limits confidence in backing the hosts to lead at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
AGMKXorazm
16Shots7
AGMKXorazm
9Shots on target2
AGMKXorazm
2.03xG0.82
AGMKXorazm
8Corners5
AGMKXorazm
56Dangerous attacks33
AGMKXorazm
15Fouls9
AGMKXorazm
0Cards2
AGMKXorazm

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.42Goals scored / match0.89
AGMKXorazm
1.32Goals conceded / match1.47
AGMKXorazm
52%Average possession48%
AGMKXorazm
4.05Shots on target / match2.47
AGMKXorazm

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.79Shots per match7.68
AGMKXorazm
4.05Shots on target2.47
AGMKXorazm
11.1%Shot conversion11.6%
AGMKXorazm
52%Possession48%
AGMKXorazm
1.6xG for1.01
AGMKXorazm
1.34xG against1.61
AGMKXorazm

Shooting quality

AGMK: BalancedXorazm: Balanced
AGMKXorazm
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AGMK
LWLLD
Season result split
42% W26% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Xorazm
LWDLL
Season result split
26% W26% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-9
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGMK is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - AGMK · 0.89 goals / match - Xorazm

AGMK is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - AGMK · 1.47 goals / match - Xorazm

AGMK scoring profile: strong

AGMK scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Xorazm scoring profile: very strong

Xorazm scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

27Goals scored (season)17
AGMKXorazm
25Goals conceded (season)28
AGMKXorazm
2.74Average goals in match2.37
AGMKXorazm
4Goals scored (last 5)6
AGMKXorazm
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
AGMKXorazm

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
AGMKXorazm
47%2 goals21%
AGMKXorazm
21%3 goals0%
AGMKXorazm
5%4 goals0%
AGMKXorazm

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal74%
AGMKXorazm
42%2 goals47%
AGMKXorazm
5%3 goals16%
AGMKXorazm
0%4 goals5%
AGMKXorazm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
AGMKXorazm
0%BTTS in both halves5%
AGMKXorazm
16%Scored in both halves21%
AGMKXorazm

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
AGMKXorazm
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
AGMKXorazm
40%BTTS - last 560%
AGMKXorazm

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AGMKXorazm
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
AGMKXorazm
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AGMKXorazm

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
AGMKXorazm
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
AGMKXorazm
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
AGMKXorazm

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGMK - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Xorazm - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.11
AGMKXorazm
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.42
AGMKXorazm
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
AGMKXorazm
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.11
AGMKXorazm
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AGMKXorazm
63%No goal before half-time58%
AGMKXorazm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.05
AGMKXorazm
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
AGMKXorazm
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
AGMKXorazm
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.26
AGMKXorazm
37%Clean sheet after half-time37%
AGMKXorazm
53%No goal after half-time53%
AGMKXorazm

AGMK - second-half results

37% W26% D37% L
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Xorazm - second-half results

26% W26% D47% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AGMK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Xorazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Xorazm
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Xorazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

AGMKLigaXorazm
Average goals in match▲ 2.742.59▼ 2.37
Both teams scored▲ 63%53%▼ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%51%▼ 42%
Clean sheets▼ 16%27%• 26%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%67%• 68%
Goal after half-time▲ 84%76%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. XorazmYellow cardRafael Sabino dos Santos
  2. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Maksim ShiryaevOff: Elzio Lohan Alves Lucio
  3. XorazmSubstitutionOn: Azizjon AkhrorovOff: Rustam Abdukhamidov
  4. XorazmYellow cardDiyorbek Ortiqboyev
  5. AGMKSubstitutionOn: Arihiro SentokuOff: Mirjamol Kosimov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): AGMK 2 - 0 - 1 Xorazm. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Xorazm
1 : 0
AGMK
FK AGMK
3 : 1
Xorazm FK Urganch
Xorazm FK Urganch
0 : 1
FK AGMK

FAQ

What was the result of AGMK vs Xorazm?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished AGMK 1:0 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGMK and Xorazm?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches AGMK won 2, Xorazm won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGMK vs Xorazm?

AGMK score 1.42 goals per game on average and Xorazm 0.89. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of AGMK's matches and 47% of Xorazm's.

What form are AGMK and Xorazm in?

Over the last 5 games AGMK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Xorazm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGMK vs Xorazm?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for AGMK vs Xorazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.