Argentina - Prim B NacionalEstadio Ofelia RosenzuaigData current as of 17 October 2026

Agropecuario vs Ciudad de Bolívar: match statistics

Agropecuario vs Ciudad de Bolívar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Agropecuario played Ciudad de Bolívar in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Ofelia Rosenzuaig. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Agropecuario: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ciudad de Bolívar: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Agropecuario scores 0.88 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Ciudad de Bolívar scores 0.88 and concedes 0.83. League average: 1.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Agropecuario 42%, Ciudad de Bolívar 38%. Over 2.5: Agropecuario 33%, Ciudad de Bolívar 25%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

Agropecuario has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.12. Agropecuario: 10.6 shots per match, Ciudad de Bolívar: 8.7.

Match halves

Agropecuario: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67. Ciudad de Bolívar: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Agropecuario: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ciudad de Bolívar: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.93 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Agropecuario come into the match in clearly better form: they have collected 8 points from their last five games, winning twice and losing only once, while Ciudad de Bolívar have taken 4 points and suffered 3 defeats. The hosts are also more clinical during the current run, scoring 7 goals in five matches compared with just 3 for the visitors. At home, Agropecuario create chances worth an average of 1.47 xG and register 4.83 shots on target per match, while their opponents allow 1.68 xG away from home. Ciudad de Bolívar have a solid away defensive record, conceding an average of just 0.58 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of away matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of a low-scoring game and a draw. Nevertheless, the hosts’ advantage in chance creation, possession—51% to 39%—and current form points to a narrow victory for Agropecuario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is supported by the low-scoring profile of both teams: Agropecuario average 0.92 goals, while Ciudad de Bolívar average 0.83 goals per match. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches and concede just 0.58 goals per game, significantly limiting the hosts’ chances of scoring. Ciudad de Bolívar have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.6 per game, while Agropecuario have conceded just 0.8 goals per match over the same period. The visitors’ season BTTS rate is only 25%, clearly below the hosts’ 50% and the league average of 41%, while just 17% of their matches combined at least three goals with both teams scoring. Although the visitors’ recent xG has risen to 1.27, their poor finishing and the defensive numbers of both teams point more strongly to a scenario in which at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly points to a low-scoring game: fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 83% of Agropecuario’s matches and as many as 92% of Ciudad de Bolívar’s fixtures. The visitors concede just 0.58 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their appearances, although their defensive record has been weaker over the last five games, with an average of 1.6 goals conceded. Ciudad de Bolívar’s attack has scored only 0.83 goals per match this season, while their last five outings produced just 3 goals, limiting the potential for a high-scoring game. Agropecuario have been more effective recently, averaging 1.4 goals per match in their last five fixtures, but their season-long average stands at just 0.92 goals. The projected total of 2.05 goals remains close to the low league average of 1.93, making Under 3.5 the strongest data-backed option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Agropecuario were level at the break in 67% of their matches, compared with 58% for Ciudad de Bolívar. Both teams tend to produce very low-scoring first halves: the hosts average 0.50 goals before half-time, while the visitors average 0.42, with just 0.58 total goals scored in Ciudad de Bolívar’s away first halves. After the interval, however, the advantage shifts towards Agropecuario, who have averaged 1.2 second-half goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.2 for their opponents. Current form also favours the hosts: they have taken 1.6 points per game across their last five appearances, compared with 0.8 for Ciudad de Bolívar, who lost three of those five matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals per game. The X/1 scenario best combines the high probability of a cautious start with the hosts’ clearly stronger finish.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
15Shots12
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4Shots on target3
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
1.75xG1.32
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
9Corners8
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
72Dangerous attacks49
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
7Fouls25
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
3Cards6
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.88Goals scored / match0.88
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
1.17Goals conceded / match0.83
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
49%Average possession45%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
3.79Shots on target / match2.54
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.58Shots per match8.71
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
3.79Shots on target2.54
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
8.3%Shot conversion10%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
49%Possession45%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
1.28xG for1.12
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
1.28xG against1.61
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Shooting quality

Agropecuario: BalancedCiudad de Bolívar: Balanced
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
Accuracy (shots on target)36%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Agropecuario is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Agropecuario · 0.8 pts / match - Ciudad de Bolívar

Agropecuario
DDWLW
Season result split
25% W33% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-10
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ciudad de Bolívar
LDWLL
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ciudad de Bolívar is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.83 goals / match - Ciudad de Bolívar

Agropecuario scoring profile: mixed

Agropecuario scores in 54% of matches (13 of 24 matches), while Ciudad de Bolívar keeps a clean sheet in 54% (13 of 24 matches).

Ciudad de Bolívar scoring profile: strong

Ciudad de Bolívar scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Agropecuario keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).

21Goals scored (season)21
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
28Goals conceded (season)20
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
2.04Average goals in match1.71
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
7Goals scored (last 5)3
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal67%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
25%2 goals17%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
8%3 goals4%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0%4 goals0%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal46%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
42%2 goals25%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4%3 goals8%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4%4 goals4%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Ciudad de Bolívar - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 24 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time21%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0%BTTS in both halves4%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
17%Scored in both halves13%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
60%BTTS - last 540%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ciudad de Bolívar is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.38 pts / match - Ciudad de Bolívar

Agropecuario - half-time state
13% leading46% draw42% trailing
Ciudad de Bolívar - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.38
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.46
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.79
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
54%Clean sheet before half-time67%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
79%No goal before half-time63%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.38
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
1.25Average goals (2nd half)0.92
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
63%Clean sheet after half-time71%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar
50%No goal after half-time58%
AgropecuarioCiudad de Bolívar

Agropecuario - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
20
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ciudad de Bolívar - second-half results

33% W38% D29% L
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Agropecuario - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ciudad de Bolívar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Agropecuario
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
8
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Ciudad de Bolívar
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Agropecuario

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Ciudad de Bolívar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

AgropecuarioLigaCiudad de Bolívar
Average goals in match▲ 2.041.93▼ 1.71
Both teams scored• 42%41%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 33%31%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▼ 33%38%▲ 54%
Goal before half-time▲ 58%55%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time• 71%71%▼ 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
0.76
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardGuillermo Sánchez
  2. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardAlex Rubén Díaz Borda
  3. AgropecuarioYellow cardSantiago Alejandro Gallucci Otero
  4. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardEzequiel Navarro
  5. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardNahuel Yeri
  6. AgropecuarioSubstitutionOn: Enzo Feliciano AguirreOff: Facundo Horacio Sánchez
  7. AgropecuarioYellow cardBraian Aranda
  8. Ciudad de BolívarSubstitutionOn: Tomas GuiacobiniOff: Brian Nicolás Quintana
  9. AgropecuarioGoalBrian Leonel Blando
  10. AgropecuarioSubstitutionOn: Alan Maximiliano AguirreOff: Rodrigo Marcos Mosquera
  11. Ciudad de BolívarSubstitutionOn: Francisco IlarreguiOff: Alex Rubén Díaz Borda
  12. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardEzequiel Navarro
  13. Ciudad de BolívarYellow cardElías Martínez
  14. AgropecuarioYellow cardLuciano Manuel Acosta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Agropecuario 0 - 1 - 0 Ciudad de Bolívar. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Agropecuario vs Ciudad de Bolívar?

The Prim B Nacional match finished Agropecuario 1:0 Ciudad de Bolívar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Agropecuario vs Ciudad de Bolívar?

Agropecuario score 0.88 goals per game on average and Ciudad de Bolívar 0.88. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Agropecuario's matches and 38% of Ciudad de Bolívar's.

What form are Agropecuario and Ciudad de Bolívar in?

Over the last 5 games Agropecuario have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ciudad de Bolívar 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Agropecuario vs Ciudad de Bolívar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.