Agropecuario vs Quilmes: match statistics
Agropecuario vs Quilmes: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Agropecuario play Quilmes in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 21:00. Venue: Estadio Ofelia Rosenzuaig. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Agropecuario: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Quilmes: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Agropecuario scores 0.71 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Quilmes scores 0.90 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.89 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Agropecuario 38%, Quilmes 25%. Over 2.5: Agropecuario 24%, Quilmes 35%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Quilmes has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.27. Agropecuario: 10.6 shots per match, Quilmes: 10.7.
Match halves
Agropecuario: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.52. Quilmes: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Agropecuario: 76-90+ (6 goals). Quilmes: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back the home win (1) because Agropecuario shows superior form and efficiency recently: in the last 5 matches they scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points, while Quilmes have only 1 goal and 0.4 points over the same period. Home indicators favor Agropecuario — average home xG 1.57, 5.0 on-target shots per game from 13.29 total shots, versus Quilmes away xG 1.36, 3.71 on-target and 10.57 total shots. Defensively the visitors are weaker: Quilmes concedes 1.29 goals on average away and have only 14% clean sheets, while Agropecuario concede 1.00 at home and keep 43% clean sheets. Additionally, Quilmes suffer 71% losses on the road and fail to score in 57% of away matches, which significantly limits their chances despite a slightly higher conversion (9% vs 8%). Considering the possession edge (51% vs 45%) and the greater number of created chances, I estimate probabilities: home win 60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Agropecuario | Quilmes | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Quilmes is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.4 pts / match - Quilmes
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Quilmes is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.9 goals / match - Quilmes
Quilmes is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.8 goals / match - Quilmes
Agropecuario scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while Quilmes keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).
Quilmes scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Agropecuario keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Agropecuario
Over / Under — Quilmes
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Quilmes is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.76 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.25 pts / match - Quilmes
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Agropecuario - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Quilmes - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Agropecuario
Quilmes
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Agropecuario | Liga | Quilmes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.90 | 1.89 | ▼ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | • 38% | 39% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 30% | ▲ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 39% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Agropecuario vs Quilmes?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Agropecuario 0:0 Quilmes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Agropecuario vs Quilmes?
Agropecuario score 0.71 goals per game on average and Quilmes 0.90. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Agropecuario's matches and 25% of Quilmes's.
What form are Agropecuario and Quilmes in?
Over the last 5 games Agropecuario have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Quilmes 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Agropecuario vs Quilmes?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Agropecuario vs Quilmes: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.