Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán: match statistics
Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Agropecuario played San Martín Tucumán in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Agropecuario: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. San Martín Tucumán: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Agropecuario scores 0.78 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. San Martín Tucumán scores 1.11 and concedes 0.56. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Agropecuario 44%, San Martín Tucumán 44%. Over 2.5: Agropecuario 33%, San Martín Tucumán 11%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 29%.
xG, shots and style
Agropecuario has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.33. Agropecuario: 12.0 shots per match, San Martín Tucumán: 9.3.
Match halves
Agropecuario: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56. San Martín Tucumán: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Agropecuario: 61-75 (3 goals). San Martín Tucumán: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 29%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hosts Agropecuario have a season record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses; in the last 5 matches they scored only 2 goals, conceded 10 and average 0.2 points per game, indicating a clear drop in form. At home they average 14.2 shots (5.2 on target) and an xG of 1.73, but score only 1.0 goal per game and convert just 7% of attempts, with 40% of matches without a goal—generating many chances with poor finishing. San Martín Tucumán are unbeaten this season (3 wins, 6 draws, 0 losses); away they average 1.25 goals and only 0.5 conceded per game, 0% matches without a goal and 50% clean sheets, reflecting a stable defence. The visitors need fewer shots (9.25 per game, 4.75 on target) to be effective—their conversion rate is 14% with an away xG of 1.33—and they have 1.4 points per game in the last 5 fixtures. Considering hosts concede 1.4 goals at home versus 0.5 for the visitors and their poor finishing, I predict a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Agropecuario has a seasonal BTTS rate of 40% (and 40% in the last 5 matches), while San Martín has 50% for the season and 40% in the last 5; the league average BTTS is only 37%. Seasonally Agropecuario have scored 7 and conceded 13, whereas San Martín have 10 goals for and 5 against, indicating an advantage for the visitors in goal balance. In the last 5 matches Agropecuario averaged 0.4 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, while San Martín averaged 0.8 scored and 0.4 conceded, so current form favors the visitors and points to finishing issues for the hosts. San Martín register more shots on target (4.75 vs 3.2) and have a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%); despite identical seasonal xG of 1.33 for both, recent xG of 1.47 for Agropecuario versus 1.19 for San Martín suggests the hosts are creating chances but not converting them. Therefore I project No BTTS as more likely — 65% for "No" vs 35% for "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates moderate goal potential: Agropecuario has xG_for 1.33 while San Martín concedes xG_against 1.00, translating to roughly 1.17 xG for the home side; San Martín has xG_for 1.33 versus the home defense's xG_against 0.85, i.e. about 1.09 xG for the visitors. Combined that is approximately 2.26 xG, but seasonal goal averages are 1.0 (Agropecuario) and 1.25 (San Martín), and the league averages 1.83 goals per match — so raw xG should be adjusted downward. In their last 5 matches the hosts have scored 2 and conceded 10 (0.4 scored / 2.0 conceded avg), while the visitors have scored 4 and conceded 2 (0.8 / 0.4 avg); after adjustment I expect about 1.05 goals for Agropecuario and 0.70 for San Martín (total 1.75). Seasonal Over/Under stats confirm defensive tendencies: Agropecuario games exceed Over 2.5 goals in only 20% of cases, San Martín in 0%, hosts keep a clean sheet in 60% of matches, and in the league one team records a clean sheet in 81% of matches — therefore the strongest signal is Under 2.5 (≈74%), while Over 1.5 is moderately likely (≈56%), and Over 3.5 is very unlikely (≈10%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is 2/2 (San Martín Tucumán leads at the break and wins), because the visitors have a 50% win rate this season versus 20% for the hosts, and in the last 5 matches San Martín averaged 1.8 points by half-time vs 0.4 for Agropecuario. The visitors create markedly more chances: on average 4.75 shots on target versus 3.2 for the hosts, with an equal xG of 1.33, and a higher conversion rate of 14% vs 11%, which increases the likelihood that they will convert chances into goals. Additionally San Martín scored 2 goals in the 0–15 minute window versus 0 for Agropecuario in that period, and in the last 5 fixtures they led at the break in 40% of cases vs 0% for the hosts. Nevertheless, the high proportion of clean sheets for Agropecuario this season (60%) and the large number of half-time draws for the hosts (80%) also justify a significant probability of draws, so I allocate 18% to X/X and 22% to X/2 as alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Agropecuario | San Martín Tucumán | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
San Martín Tucumán is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.4 pts / match - San Martín Tucumán
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Martín Tucumán is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Agropecuario · 1.11 goals / match - San Martín Tucumán
San Martín Tucumán is 157% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Agropecuario · 0.56 goals / match - San Martín Tucumán
Agropecuario scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while San Martín Tucumán keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).
San Martín Tucumán scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Agropecuario keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Agropecuario
Over / Under - San Martín Tucumán
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Martín Tucumán is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - Agropecuario · 1.67 pts / match - San Martín Tucumán
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Agropecuario - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
San Martín Tucumán - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Agropecuario
San Martín Tucumán
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Agropecuario | Liga | San Martín Tucumán | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.22 | 1.80 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 36% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▼ 11% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 42% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 69% | ▼ 44% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Agropecuario 2:0 San Martín Tucumán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?
Agropecuario score 0.78 goals per game on average and San Martín Tucumán 1.11. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Agropecuario's matches and 44% of San Martín Tucumán's.
What form are Agropecuario and San Martín Tucumán in?
Over the last 5 games Agropecuario have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and San Martín Tucumán 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Agropecuario vs San Martín Tucumán?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


