Águila vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
Águila stands as the favorite for this match, especially considering their excellent form in the last five games (4 wins, 2.4 points per game). The hosts win 50% of their home matches and have a positive goal difference (+4) on their own ground. While Cacahuatique has a decent 53% away win rate, they have only averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five, indicating a dip in form. Águila boasts superior xG statistics in home fixtures (1.47 vs the visitors' 1.3 xG) and a higher average possession rate (53% vs 45%). A key factor is also the hosts' tally of 51 goals this season, with only 11% of their home games ending without a goal, highlighting offensive efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, Águila should secure the victory, though Cacahuatique, with a 35% clean sheet rate away, could pose problems, hence a moderate probability of a draw.
Águila vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Águila played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Águila: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Cacahuatique: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Águila scores 1.42 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.24 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Águila 53%, Cacahuatique 59%. Over 2.5: Águila 56%, Cacahuatique 62%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Águila has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.38. Águila: 9.1 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.7.
Match halves
Águila: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.67. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Águila: 16-30 (12 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Águila stands as the favorite for this match, especially considering their excellent form in the last five games (4 wins, 2.4 points per game). The hosts win 50% of their home matches and have a positive goal difference (+4) on their own ground. While Cacahuatique has a decent 53% away win rate, they have only averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five, indicating a dip in form. Águila boasts superior xG statistics in home fixtures (1.47 vs the visitors' 1.3 xG) and a higher average possession rate (53% vs 45%). A key factor is also the hosts' tally of 51 goals this season, with only 11% of their home games ending without a goal, highlighting offensive efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, Águila should secure the victory, though Cacahuatique, with a 35% clean sheet rate away, could pose problems, hence a moderate probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Águila | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Águila is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Águila · 1.4 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Águila is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - Águila · 1.24 goals / match - Cacahuatique
Águila is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Águila · 1.38 goals / match - Cacahuatique
Águila scores in 78% of matches (28 of 36 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).
Cacahuatique scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Águila keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Águila
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Águila is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - Águila · 1.41 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Águila - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Águila
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Águila | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.71 | • 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 69% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ÁguilaGoalRicardo Villatoro
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Águila 1 - 0 - 1 Cacahuatique. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Águila vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Águila 1:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Águila and Cacahuatique?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Águila won 1, Cacahuatique won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Águila vs Cacahuatique?
Águila score 1.42 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.24. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Águila's matches and 59% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are Águila and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games Águila have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Cacahuatique 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Águila vs Cacahuatique?
The statistical background for Águila vs Cacahuatique — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.