Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Aktobe vs Irtysh: match statistics

Aktobe crest
Aktobe
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Irtysh crest
Irtysh

Aktobe vs Irtysh: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aktobe played Irtysh in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Aktobe: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Irtysh: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aktobe scores 1.17 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Irtysh scores 1.33 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aktobe 50%, Irtysh 83%. Over 2.5: Aktobe 33%, Irtysh 67%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Aktobe has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.31. Aktobe: 13.5 shots per match, Irtysh: 10.0.

Match halves

Aktobe: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67. Irtysh: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Aktobe: 16-30 (2 goals). Irtysh: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aktobe shows strong home metrics: at home they average 2.00 goals per game, have a 67% win rate, concede 1.67 goals on average and post xG 1.85 versus opponent xG 1.29. Irtysh have yet to win away (0% away wins), record 67% draws on the road, score 1.67 and concede 2.00 with xG 1.33 and xG against 1.91. Aktobe averages 17 shots and 6.67 on target at home versus Irtysh’s 10.33 shots and 5.33 on target away, and also maintain higher possession (57% vs 50%), indicating an advantage in chance creation. Both teams earn 1.4 points in their last 5 matches, and neither side had a match without scoring in the analysed period (0% such games), so I expect goals from both teams. Considering Aktobe’s higher quality of chances (xG 1.85 vs 1.33) and Irtysh’s lack of away wins, I tip a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Irtysh has a season-long BTTS rate of 100%, while Aktobe sits at 67%, a strong indicator that both teams regularly score and concede. In the last 5 matches Irtysh registered BTTS in 60% of games, Aktobe in 40%, with average goals scored of 1.6 and 1.4 respectively and both conceding 1.2 goals per game over that period. xG and shot metrics confirm open play: xG for Irtysh is 1.33 versus 1.28 for Aktobe, while xG against is 1.91 for Irtysh and 1.02 for Aktobe; Irtysh averages 5.33 shots on target versus 3.67 and has a conversion rate of 16% compared to 10%. This season Aktobe have scored 7 and conceded 8, Irtysh have scored 8 and conceded 9, and Irtysh have 0% clean sheets this season, which further increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering these figures and the fact that Irtysh matches are 100% over 2.5 goals versus a league average of 2.17, I rate BTTS - Yes at 85% and No Goal at 15%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Combined xG and seasonal statistics point to a higher-than-average scoring game: Aktobe has xG_for 1.28 while Irtysh concedes xG_against 1.91, yielding an estimated 1.60 goals for the home side. For the visitors, the combination of xG_for 1.33 and the home xG_against 1.02 gives an estimated 1.18 goals, with total projected goals of 2.78 (1.60+1.18). Irtysh concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has 100% of its games over 2.5 goals this season, whereas Aktobe has 33% of such matches, which increases the scoring likelihood. Additionally, Irtysh records 5.33 SOT with 16% conversion, Aktobe 3.67 SOT with 10% conversion, and both teams have high BTTS rates (67% and 100%), so the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (≈77%), with a moderate probability for Over 2.5 (≈53%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis supports Aktobe having the lead at the break: in the last 5 matches they led at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and score an average of 1.0 first-half goals versus 0.25 for Irtysh. Additionally, Aktobe produces 1.28 xG per match, while Irtysh concedes opponents’ xG of 1.91 and loses an average of 2.0 goals per match, which increases the likelihood of goals for the hosts. Irtysh frequently draws (67% draws this season) and all their matches this season have seen both teams score (BTTS 100%), which raises the risk of stalemates, but Aktobe’s season average points of 1.33 versus 0.67 for Irtysh and an average half-time points of 2.0 for Aktobe over the last 5 fixtures suggest the hosts will maintain the advantage. Therefore, the most likely scenario based on available data is Aktobe leading at half-time and the hosts winning (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
AktobeIrtysh
17Shots10
AktobeIrtysh
5Shots on target5
AktobeIrtysh
1.73xG1.26
AktobeIrtysh
3Corners4
AktobeIrtysh
43Dangerous attacks38
AktobeIrtysh
9Fouls12
AktobeIrtysh
3Cards2
AktobeIrtysh

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match1.33
AktobeIrtysh
1.33Goals conceded / match1.5
AktobeIrtysh
55%Average possession56%
AktobeIrtysh
5Shots on target / match4.5
AktobeIrtysh

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match10
AktobeIrtysh
5Shots on target4.5
AktobeIrtysh
8.6%Shot conversion13.3%
AktobeIrtysh
55%Possession56%
AktobeIrtysh
1.48xG for1.31
AktobeIrtysh
1.31xG against1.47
AktobeIrtysh

Shooting quality

Aktobe: BalancedIrtysh: Efficient finishing
AktobeIrtysh
Accuracy (shots on target)37%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Irtysh is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Aktobe · 1 pts / match - Irtysh

Aktobe
LLDWL
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Irtysh
DDWLL
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Irtysh is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Aktobe · 1.33 goals / match - Irtysh

Aktobe is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Aktobe · 1.5 goals / match - Irtysh

Aktobe scoring profile: very strong

Aktobe scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Irtysh keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Irtysh scoring profile: very strong

Irtysh scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

7Goals scored (season)8
AktobeIrtysh
8Goals conceded (season)9
AktobeIrtysh
2.5Average goals in match2.83
AktobeIrtysh
3Goals scored (last 5)6
AktobeIrtysh
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
AktobeIrtysh

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
AktobeIrtysh
17%2 goals33%
AktobeIrtysh
17%3 goals0%
AktobeIrtysh
17%4 goals0%
AktobeIrtysh

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal83%
AktobeIrtysh
17%2 goals67%
AktobeIrtysh
17%3 goals0%
AktobeIrtysh
17%4 goals0%
AktobeIrtysh

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
AktobeIrtysh
0%BTTS in both halves17%
AktobeIrtysh
17%Scored in both halves17%
AktobeIrtysh

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
AktobeIrtysh
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AktobeIrtysh
40%BTTS - last 580%
AktobeIrtysh

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AktobeIrtysh
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AktobeIrtysh
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AktobeIrtysh

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
AktobeIrtysh
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
AktobeIrtysh
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AktobeIrtysh

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aktobe is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / match - Aktobe · 1.17 pts / match - Irtysh

Aktobe - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Irtysh - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per match (1st half)1.17
AktobeIrtysh
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AktobeIrtysh
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AktobeIrtysh
0.67Average goals (1st half)1
AktobeIrtysh
83%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AktobeIrtysh
50%No goal before half-time50%
AktobeIrtysh

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.83
AktobeIrtysh
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
AktobeIrtysh
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)1
AktobeIrtysh
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.83
AktobeIrtysh
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
AktobeIrtysh
67%No goal after half-time33%
AktobeIrtysh

Aktobe - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Irtysh - second-half results

0% W83% D17% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aktobe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Irtysh - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aktobe
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Irtysh
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aktobe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Irtysh

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AktobeLigaIrtysh
Average goals in match 2.502.14 2.83
Both teams scored 50%53% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 67%
Clean sheets 17%30% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%59% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IrtyshYellow cardPavel Sedko
  2. IrtyshYellow cardMiras Omatay
  3. AktobeYellow cardDanilo Mitrović
  4. IrtyshSubstitutionOn: Yushi ShimamuraOff: Miras Omatay
  5. AktobeYellow cardNikita Korzun
  6. AktobeSubstitutionOn: Dmytro TopalovOff: Arman Kenesov
  7. AktobeSubstitutionOn: Vitaliy LaturnusOff: Artur Shushenachev
  8. AktobeSubstitutionOn: Miram KikbaevOff: Dmytro Topalov
  9. IrtyshSubstitutionOn: Vyacheslav ShvyrevOff: Vladislav Klimovich
  10. IrtyshSubstitutionOn: Ramazan KarimovOff: Tamerlan Agimanov
  11. AktobeYellow cardAdilkhan Tanzharikov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Aktobe vs Irtysh?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Aktobe 1:0 Irtysh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Aktobe vs Irtysh?

Aktobe score 1.17 goals per game on average and Irtysh 1.33. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Aktobe's matches and 83% of Irtysh's.

What form are Aktobe and Irtysh in?

Over the last 5 games Aktobe have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Irtysh 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aktobe vs Irtysh?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.