Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueOrtalıq StadionData current as of 23 July 2026

Aktobe vs Kyzyl-Zhar: match statistics

Aktobe crest
Aktobe
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe vs Kyzyl-Zhar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aktobe play Kyzyl-Zhar in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Ortalıq Stadion. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Aktobe: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aktobe scores 1.44 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aktobe 44%, Kyzyl-Zhar 44%. Over 2.5: Aktobe 39%, Kyzyl-Zhar 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Aktobe has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.18. Aktobe: 12.9 shots per match, Kyzyl-Zhar: 10.0.

Match halves

Aktobe: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.94. Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Aktobe: 46-60 (6 goals). Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Although both teams have 12 goals scored and 11 conceded this season, the home/away split clearly favors Aktobe. Aktobe at home averages 1.83 goals and 16.33 shots (5.67 on target) with an 11% conversion rate and xG 1.74, while Kyzyl-Zhar away records only 0.5 goals, 10 shots (2.75 on target), 5% conversion and xG 1.07. In the last 5 matches Aktobe scored 7 goals, with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss and an average of 1.6 points per game, whereas Kyzyl-Zhar in that period scored 4 goals, won 1 and lost 4, averaging 0.6 points per game. Defensively the visitors concede only 0.75 goals on average away (xG against 1.17), but their low efficiency (5% conversion) and the fact they fail to score in 50% of away games limit their prospects against a team that has 0% games without scoring at home and 50% clean sheets. Considering Aktobe’s advantage in shots on target (5.67 vs 2.75), higher xG (1.74 vs 1.07) and better points return over the last 5 matches, I tip the home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
20Shots9
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
6Shots on target4
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
2.04xG1.04
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
8Corners2
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
50Dangerous attacks25
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
17Fouls18
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
2Cards1
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.44Goals scored / match1
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
1.11Goals conceded / match1.44
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
53%Average possession44%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
4.89Shots on target / match3.83
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.89Shots per match10
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
4.89Shots on target3.83
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
11.2%Shot conversion10%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
53%Possession44%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
1.45xG for1.18
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
1.4xG against1.51
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Shooting quality

Aktobe: BalancedKyzyl-Zhar: Balanced
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
Accuracy (shots on target)38%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Aktobe is 800% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Aktobe · 0.2 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe
WLWLW
Season result split
44% W22% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-6
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kyzyl-Zhar
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W22% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-10
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aktobe is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Aktobe · 1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Aktobe · 1.44 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe scoring profile: very strong

Aktobe scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: mixed

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

26Goals scored (season)18
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
20Goals conceded (season)26
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
2.56Average goals in match2.44
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
10Goals scored (last 5)3
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal56%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
44%2 goals28%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
17%3 goals11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
11%4 goals6%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal78%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
28%2 goals50%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
11%3 goals11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
6%4 goals6%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
11%BTTS in both halves0%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
33%Scored in both halves11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
60%BTTS - last 540%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aktobe is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Aktobe · 1.06 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
11% leading72% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.06
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.28
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0.28Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.61
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
72%Clean sheet before half-time72%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
56%No goal before half-time78%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.89
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.11
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.83
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
44%Clean sheet after half-time39%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar
39%No goal after half-time56%
AktobeKyzyl-Zhar

Aktobe - second-half results

28% W50% R22% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

17% W39% R44% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aktobe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aktobe
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
5
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
6
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aktobe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AktobeLigaKyzyl-Zhar
Average goals in match 2.562.31 2.44
Both teams scored 44%52% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%42% 50%
Clean sheets 33%29% 22%
Goal before half-time 61%62% 39%
Goal after half-time 78%70% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Aktobe 1 - 1 - 0 Kyzyl-Zhar. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Aktobe
1 : 0
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
1 : 1
FK Aktobe

FAQ

What was the result of Aktobe vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Aktobe 0:0 Kyzyl-Zhar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Aktobe and Kyzyl-Zhar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Aktobe won 1, Kyzyl-Zhar won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Aktobe vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

Aktobe score 1.44 goals per game on average and Kyzyl-Zhar 1.00. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Aktobe's matches and 44% of Kyzyl-Zhar's.

What form are Aktobe and Kyzyl-Zhar in?

Over the last 5 games Aktobe have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Kyzyl-Zhar 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aktobe vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.