Al Adalh vs Al Anwar: match statistics
Al Adalh vs Al Anwar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Adalh play Al Anwar in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 17:50. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Al Adalh: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Al Anwar: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Adalh scores 1.29 and concedes 2.06 goals per match. Al Anwar scores 1.56 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Adalh 74%, Al Anwar 74%. Over 2.5: Al Adalh 62%, Al Anwar 56%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Al Anwar has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.17. Al Adalh: 9.9 shots per match, Al Anwar: 10.8.
Match halves
Al Adalh: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.68. Al Anwar: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Al Adalh: 31-45+ (12 goals). Al Anwar: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict a draw (X). Al Adalh have a very weak home defence — conceding 2.33 goals per home game and already shipping 69 goals this season with 0% clean sheets, whereas Al Anwar concede only 1.47 goals per away match and have a 13% clean sheet rate. The visitors also display a strong draw trend: 60% of their away games end in draws, and the hosts draw 40% of their home matches, which increases the probability of a shared point. In attack the hosts average 11.2 shots and 3.67 shots on target per game, scoring 1.33 goals at home with an xG of 1.31, while Al Anwar average 9.07 shots per match and 1.13 goals with an xG of 1.09, so the home advantage in chance creation is marginal. In the last 5 matches Al Adalh have scored 7 and conceded 11, while Al Anwar have scored 12 and conceded 9, both averaging 1.4 points in that period, which overall leads to assessing a draw as the most likely outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Adalh | Al Anwar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Adalh is 150% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Al Adalh · 1.2 pts / match - Al Anwar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Anwar is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Al Adalh · 1.56 goals / match - Al Anwar
Al Anwar is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.06 goals / match - Al Adalh · 1.59 goals / match - Al Anwar
Al Adalh scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while Al Anwar keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).
Al Anwar scores in 85% of matches (29 of 34 matches), while Al Adalh keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Adalh
Over / Under — Al Anwar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Anwar is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Al Adalh · 1.21 pts / match - Al Anwar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Adalh - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Anwar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Adalh
Al Anwar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Adalh | Liga | Al Anwar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.35 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 62% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 62% | 61% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 22% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 76% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 85% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Adalh 0 - 0 - 1 Al Anwar. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
The First Division match finished Al Adalh 2:1 Al Anwar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
Al Adalh score 1.29 goals per game on average and Al Anwar 1.56. The First Division average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Al Adalh's matches and 74% of Al Anwar's.
What form are Al Adalh and Al Anwar in?
Over the last 5 games Al Adalh have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Al Anwar 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Adalh vs Al Anwar?
The statistical background for Al Adalh vs Al Anwar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.