Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Al Ansar vs Al Hikma: match statistics

Al Ansar crest
Al Ansar
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Al Hikma crest
Al Hikma
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

As the league leader, Al Ansar presents dominant home form, winning 83% of their home matches and conceding just 0.5 goals per match. The hosts have scored 24 goals this season while conceding only 6, resulting in an impressive goal difference of +18. Al Hikma struggles significantly on the road, winning only 29% of their matches and failing to score in 43% of away games. The difference in possession (59% vs 49%), shot conversion (19% vs 13%), and the quality of chances created (xG 1.79 vs 0.99) clearly favors the hosts. Al Ansar's recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) compared to the visitors' inconsistency (1 win in 5 matches) further confirms the advantage of the leader, who should comfortably win this meeting.

Al Ansar vs Al Hikma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Ansar played Al Hikma in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 30 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Al Ansar: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Al Hikma: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Ansar scores 2.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Al Hikma scores 1.17 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Ansar 42%, Al Hikma 33%. Over 2.5: Al Ansar 33%, Al Hikma 50%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ansar has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.05. Al Ansar: 9.5 shots per match, Al Hikma: 7.2.

Match halves

Al Ansar: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.17. Al Hikma: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Al Ansar: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Hikma: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

As the league leader, Al Ansar presents dominant home form, winning 83% of their home matches and conceding just 0.5 goals per match. The hosts have scored 24 goals this season while conceding only 6, resulting in an impressive goal difference of +18. Al Hikma struggles significantly on the road, winning only 29% of their matches and failing to score in 43% of away games. The difference in possession (59% vs 49%), shot conversion (19% vs 13%), and the quality of chances created (xG 1.79 vs 0.99) clearly favors the hosts. Al Ansar's recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) compared to the visitors' inconsistency (1 win in 5 matches) further confirms the advantage of the leader, who should comfortably win this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Al AnsarAl Hikma
15Shots3
Al AnsarAl Hikma
6Shots on target2
Al AnsarAl Hikma
1.9xG0.76
Al AnsarAl Hikma
5Corners6
Al AnsarAl Hikma
75Dangerous attacks60
Al AnsarAl Hikma
-1Fouls-1
Al AnsarAl Hikma
-1Cards-1
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.17
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.5Goals conceded / match1.17
Al AnsarAl Hikma
52%Average possession49%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
4.25Shots on target / match3.42
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match7.17
Al AnsarAl Hikma
4.25Shots on target3.42
Al AnsarAl Hikma
21.1%Shot conversion16.3%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
52%Possession49%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
1.5xG for1.05
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.92xG against0.89
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Shooting quality

Al Ansar: Efficient finishingAl Hikma: Efficient finishing
Al AnsarAl Hikma
Accuracy (shots on target)45%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ansar is 225% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Al Ansar · 0.8 pts / match - Al Hikma

Al Ansar
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W17% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-1
2.42 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Al Hikma
LLDLW
Season result split
42% W17% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ansar is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Al Ansar · 1.17 goals / match - Al Hikma

Al Ansar is 134% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Al Ansar · 1.17 goals / match - Al Hikma

Al Ansar scoring profile: strong

Al Ansar scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).

Al Hikma scoring profile: mixed

Al Hikma scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Al Ansar keeps a clean sheet in 58% (7 of 12 matches).

24Goals scored (season)14
Al AnsarAl Hikma
6Goals conceded (season)14
Al AnsarAl Hikma
2.5Average goals in match2.33
Al AnsarAl Hikma
9Goals scored (last 5)4
Al AnsarAl Hikma
1Goals conceded (last 5)7
Al AnsarAl Hikma

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal75%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
50%2 goals33%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
25%3 goals8%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
25%4 goals0%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

How often they concede at least...

42%1 goal42%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
8%2 goals42%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0%3 goals25%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0%4 goals8%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time17%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
33%Scored in both halves25%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
20%BTTS - last 540%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ansar is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.83 pts / match - Al Ansar · 1.25 pts / match - Al Hikma

Al Ansar - half-time state
42% leading58% draw0% trailing
Al Hikma - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per match (1st half)1.25
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.17
Al AnsarAl Hikma
92%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
50%No goal before half-time50%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Al AnsarAl Hikma
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Al AnsarAl Hikma
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Al AnsarAl Hikma
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Al AnsarAl Hikma
58%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Al AnsarAl Hikma
25%No goal after half-time50%
Al AnsarAl Hikma

Al Ansar - second-half results

67% W25% R8% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hikma - second-half results

33% W42% R25% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Ansar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Ansar
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
8
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
4
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+107%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Ansar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al AnsarLigaAl Hikma
Average goals in match 2.502.24 2.33
Both teams scored 42%30% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%39% 50%
Clean sheets 58%42% 58%
Goal before half-time 50%56% 75%
Goal after half-time 83%75% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Ali TneshA 1
Khalil Bader⚽ 1
Mahdi Al Zain⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al AnsarGoalMahdi Al Zain
  2. Al AnsarGoalKhalil BaderAssist: Ali Tnesh

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Ansar 1 - 0 - 0 Al Hikma. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Al Hikma
1 : 4
Al Ansar

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ansar vs Al Hikma?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Ansar 2:0 Al Hikma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ansar vs Al Hikma?

Al Ansar score 2.00 goals per game on average and Al Hikma 1.17. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Al Ansar's matches and 33% of Al Hikma's.

What form are Al Ansar and Al Hikma in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ansar have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Al Hikma 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ansar vs Al Hikma?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Ansar vs Al Hikma: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.