Al Anwar vs Al Ula: match statistics
Al Anwar vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Anwar played Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 27 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al Anwar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Ula: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Anwar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.17 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Anwar 70%, Al Ula 60%. Over 2.5: Al Anwar 50%, Al Ula 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ula has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.28. Al Anwar: 10.4 shots per match, Al Ula: 13.9.
Match halves
Al Anwar: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.83. Al Ula: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Al Anwar: 76-90+ (18 goals). Al Ula: 31-45+ (22 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Ula appears to be the favorite: they have 18 wins this season versus 9 for Al Anwar and sit 3rd in the table while the hosts are 10th. Defensively the visitors are markedly superior — conceding 0.93 goals on average away compared to Al Anwar’s 1.53 conceded at home, and registering 40% clean sheets versus 20% for the hosts. In attack Al Ula have scored 65 goals this season and average 2.07 goals per away match, while Al Anwar have 46 goals and 1.93 at home; despite similar xG (Al Ula 1.50 vs Al Anwar 1.51) the visitors have a better goals record and an away goal difference of +17 versus +6 for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Al Anwar scored 12 and conceded 8 with a record of 2W-2D-1L (1.6 points per game), whereas Al Ula have 11 scored and 4 conceded with 3W-1D-1L (2.0 points per game), which confirms the visitors’ superior form. Considering the better defense (0.93 vs 1.53), higher number of wins (18 vs 9) and superior goal difference, I assign higher chances to Al Ula — approximately 60% for an away win, 20% for a draw and 20% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes looks more likely based on specific metrics. Al Anwar has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%, Al Ula 53%, with the league average at 61%, which already favors both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Al Anwar recorded BTTS in 100% of games, Al Ula in 60%, with average goals scored 2.4 (Al Anwar) and 2.2 (Al Ula) over that period, confirming both teams’ offensive form. xG also supports a both-goals scenario: Al Anwar xG_for 1.74 exceeds Al Ula xG_against 1.32, and Al Ula xG_for 1.50 is higher than Al Anwar xG_against 0.99. Additionally, hosts average 6.13 shots on target vs 4.87 for visitors and have a seasonal goals average of 2.27 compared to visitors’ 2.07; on this basis I assign 75% to "Yes" and 25% to "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model implies expected goals: xG Al Anwar 1.74 vs Al Ula conceded xG 1.32 suggests ~1.53 goals for the home side, while xG Al Ula 1.50 vs Al Anwar conceded xG 0.99 suggests ~1.25 for the visitors, totaling ~2.78 goals. Seasonal figures confirm the offensive profiles of both teams — Al Anwar scores 2.27 on average and has 73% of matches Over 2.5, Al Ula scores 2.07 and has 60% Over 2.5 (league average 59% Over 2.5). A Poisson model at a 2.78 total prices Over 1.5 at ~77%, Over 2.5 at ~52% and Over 3.5 at ~30%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, Al Anwar averages 15.4 shots and 6.13 on target versus 12.53 and 4.87 for Al Ula, and the share of matches in which both teams scored is 67% (home) and 53% (away), which increases the likelihood of multiple goals. As a result I recommend an Over 1.5 bet as the safest and statistically justified choice, while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely (~52%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts show an offensive edge: they score 2.27 goals per game versus 2.07 for the visitors, have higher xG (1.74 vs 1.50) and average 15.4 shots with 6.13 on target compared to visitors' 12.53/4.87. In the first half, in the last five matches the hosts led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time, while the visitors averaged 0.8 first-half goals across those five games. The hosts also have only a 7% loss rate this season versus a 20% loss rate for the visitors and an average of 2.13 points per game versus 2.00 for the visitors, which favors their Full-Time victory. The visitors, however, have been more active after the break in the last five matches (averaging 1.4 second-half goals versus 1.0 for the hosts), and a season-long BTTS rate of 67% suggests both teams frequently score, leaving room for a draw or a turnaround; nonetheless the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time outcome of home/home (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Anwar | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ula is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Al Anwar · 2 pts / match - Al Ula
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ula is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Al Anwar · 2.17 goals / match - Al Ula
Al Ula is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Al Anwar · 0.87 goals / match - Al Ula
Al Anwar scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Al Ula scores in 90% of matches (27 of 30 matches), while Al Anwar keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Anwar
Over / Under - Al Ula
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ula is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Al Anwar · 2.17 pts / match - Al Ula
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Anwar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Ula - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Anwar
Al Ula
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Anwar | Liga | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 2.93 | • 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 22% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 84% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Anwar 0 - 1 - 0 Al Ula. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Anwar vs Al Ula?
The First Division match finished Al Anwar 1:2 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Anwar vs Al Ula?
Al Anwar score 1.53 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.17. The First Division average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Al Anwar's matches and 60% of Al Ula's.
What form are Al Anwar and Al Ula in?
Over the last 5 games Al Anwar have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Ula 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Anwar vs Al Ula?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Anwar vs Al Ula: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.