Al Anwar vs Al Wahda: match statistics
Al Anwar vs Al Wahda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Anwar played Al Wahda in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Al Anwar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Al Wahda: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Anwar scores 1.37 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Al Wahda scores 1.41 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Anwar 67%, Al Wahda 70%. Over 2.5: Al Anwar 44%, Al Wahda 78%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Al Wahda has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.21. Al Anwar: 10.1 shots per match, Al Wahda: 10.4.
Match halves
Al Anwar: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.74. Al Wahda: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Al Anwar: 76-90+ (13 goals). Al Wahda: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Anwar holds a qualitative advantage in attack and chance creation — at home they average 1.71 goals and generate xG 1.47 with 4.64 shots on target and 11.64 average shots, whereas Al Wahda away score only 1.08 goals with xG 1.12 and 3.23 shots on target. Defensively the hosts also perform better: Al Anwar concede 1.57 goals at home on average (xG against 1.22), while Al Wahda concede 1.92 goals away (xG against 1.63) and have 49 goals conceded this season versus 40 for the hosts. Additionally the hosts have a 43% home win rate and a positive home goal difference (+2), while the visitors win only 23% of away matches and have a negative away goal difference (-11). In the short term Al Wahda scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches versus 7 for Al Anwar, but the visitors more frequently finish away matches without scoring (31% vs 21%), which limits their offensive potential. Considering the xG advantage (1.47 vs 1.12), higher number of shots on target and better home defence, I forecast an Al Anwar victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS scenario is strong: Al Anwar has a seasonal BTTS rate of 79%, Al Wahda 62%, and the league average is 62%, which already suggests a tilt towards "both teams to score". Clean sheets are rare — only 7% of Al Anwar matches and 8% of Al Wahda matches end without conceding, and seasonal averages of goals conceded are 1.71 and 1.92 respectively, meaning both teams regularly allow opponents chances. In the last 5 fixtures Al Anwar scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) and conceded 7, while Al Wahda scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) and conceded 6, so both sides have been regularly delivering in attack recently. xG confirms chance creation: seasonal xG for Al Anwar is 1.40 with xG against 1.33, and for Al Wahda xG_for is 1.12 with xG_against 1.63, which yields goal opportunities on both ends. Considering these figures and the fact that 64% of home matches and 62% of away matches are a combination of over2.5 and BTTS, I assess BTTS probability at 78% and recommend a "BTTS - Yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on both teams' xG (Al Anwar xG_for 1.40, Al Wahda xG_for 1.12 and xG_against 1.33/1.63 respectively) I calculate expected goals of 1.52 for the home side and 1.23 for the away side, total 2.75. A Poisson model at this total (2.75) yields probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈76%, Over 2.5 ≈52% and Over 3.5 ≈30%. Seasonal stats confirm an offensive profile: Al Anwar has Over 1.5 in 100% and Over 2.5 in 79% of matches, Al Wahda has Over 1.5 in 85% and Over 2.5 in 77%, while BTTS is 79% for the home team and 62% for the away. Additionally, hosts average 4.64 on-target shots per match vs 3.23 for visitors, with conversion rates of 15% vs 11%, supporting a both-teams-to-score scenario. Combining the xG model and strong historical Over 1.5/Over 2.5 indicators, the strongest and most reliable pick is Over 1.5 (I recommend the 'over' side on the 1.5 line).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Anwar possess a clear offensive edge: the home-side seasonal xG is 1.40 versus Al Wahda’s 1.12, with an average of 4.64 shots on target versus 3.23 and 1.71 first-half goals versus 1.08 for the opponents, so the hosts are likely to initiate scoring. In their last five matches Al Anwar led at the break in 4 of 5 games (80%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for Al Wahda; therefore I estimate the probability of the hosts leading at the break at roughly 60% (a weighted figure between the 80% from the last five and the season-long 29%). At the same time the hosts struggle to hold leads — in those five matches they converted the half-time advantage into a win only once (20%), the season-long hold-rate from half-time is 43%, and additionally Al Anwar conceded 9 goals in minutes 76–90, which increases the risk of a late equalizer. Considering the hosts’ offensive initiative in the first half and their susceptibility to conceding in the second half, the most likely HT/FT scenario is Al Anwar leading at half-time and a draw at full-time (1/X); in the weighted model (HT distribution ~60%/30%/10% and conversion of a lead to a win ≈35%) 1/X received the highest single probability at approximately 23%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Anwar | Al Wahda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Wahda is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Al Anwar · 1.4 pts / match - Al Wahda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Anwar is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Al Anwar · 1.81 goals / match - Al Wahda
Al Anwar scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Al Wahda keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 matches).
Al Wahda scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Al Anwar keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Anwar
Over / Under - Al Wahda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Anwar is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Al Anwar · 1.19 pts / match - Al Wahda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Anwar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 26%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Wahda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Anwar
Al Wahda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Anwar | Liga | Al Wahda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.85 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Anwar 0 - 0 - 1 Al Wahda. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Anwar vs Al Wahda?
The First Division match finished Al Anwar 5:1 Al Wahda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Anwar vs Al Wahda?
Al Anwar score 1.37 goals per game on average and Al Wahda 1.41. The First Division average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Al Anwar's matches and 70% of Al Wahda's.
What form are Al Anwar and Al Wahda in?
Over the last 5 games Al Anwar have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Wahda 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Anwar vs Al Wahda?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.