Al Arabi vs Qatar SC: match statistics
Al Arabi vs Qatar SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Arabi played Qatar SC in Stars League (Qatar). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Al Arabi: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Qatar SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Arabi scores 1.84 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Qatar SC scores 1.58 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.32 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Arabi 74%, Qatar SC 63%. Over 2.5: Al Arabi 68%, Qatar SC 53%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Al Arabi has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.45. Al Arabi: 14.2 shots per match, Qatar SC: 13.2.
Match halves
Al Arabi: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.00. Qatar SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.11.
Goals by minute
Al Arabi: 31-45+ (10 goals). Qatar SC: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Stars League: 3.32 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win. Al Arabi is in clearly better form: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 11 goals (2.2 per game) and conceding 6 (1.2 per game) and averaging 2.2 points per game, while Qatar SC in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, 8 goals scored (1.6 per game), 9 conceded (1.8 per game) and 1.4 points per game. Home statistics also favor Al Arabi: average possession 57% versus 48% for the away side, 4.89 shots on target per match compared to 4.0, and 0% of home matches without scoring versus 33% such matches for Qatar. However, note Al Arabi’s defensive weakness at home (2.11 goals conceded per match), while Qatar concedes 1.44 on the road, and xG is similar (1.63 xG for Al Arabi vs 1.40 for Qatar), which reduces the certainty of the prediction. In summary, the advantage in possession, shots on target and recent offensive efficiency gives Al Arabi a higher probability of winning.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario appears more likely, as Al Arabi has a seasonal BTTS of 60% and Qatar SC 67%, with the hosts recording BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches versus 60% for the visitors. Goal metrics support this signal: average goals for and against are 1.7 and 1.7 for Al Arabi and 1.44 and 1.44 for Qatar SC, indicating both teams regularly score and concede. In the last 5 games Al Arabi averaged 2.2 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Qatar SC averaged 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded, further increasing the likelihood of mutual scoring. xG analysis shows the hosts have xG 1.49 against an xG conceded of 1.42, while the visitors have xG 1.4 against an xG conceded of 1.58; additionally Qatar SC have only 11% clean sheets this season versus 40% for Al Arabi, so the visitors rarely finish matches without conceding. Given the league BTTS level of 60% and Over2.5 with BTTS indicators at 50–56%, I assess about a 78% probability for BTTS - Yes and therefore recommend the 'Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and seasonal averages yield expected goals of 1.51 for Al Arabi and 1.50 for Qatar SC (total 3.01), indicating a match close to 3 goals. Seasonally Al Arabi scores 1.7 goals on average, Qatar SC 1.44, and matches finished over 1.5 goals in 90% of cases for Al Arabi and 67% for Qatar SC — hence a strong signal for Over 1.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Al Arabi recorded 2.2 goals per game, Qatar SC 1.6 (combined 3.8), and in the league the percentage of matches over 2.5 is 64%, so Over 2.5 is also supported (I estimate 62% probability). This is reinforced by both-teams-to-score indicators: 60% for the home side and 67% for the away side, average xG of 1.49 (Al Arabi) vs 1.40 (Qatar SC) and on average 4.1 and 4.0 shots on target, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (selection: Over 1.5) — high seasonal rates 90%/67%, expected 3.01 goals and solid xG/shots support this line, while Over 3.5 remains less likely (approx. 38%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics point to a high proportion of draws at the break: hosts were level at the interval in 40% of matches and visitors in 56%, and additionally Qatar SC keep a clean sheet at half-time in 89% of fixtures, which strongly increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. After the break the advantage lies with Al Arabi — hosts score on average 1.1 goals in the second half and have collected 17 points in second halves, averaging 1.7 points per match after the break; Qatar SC have 9 points after the break and average 1.0 point, while the visitors concede on average 1.22 goals post-break. Al Arabi also hold a slight quality edge: the hosts’ xG is 1.49 versus 1.40 for the visitors, and the hosts’ shot conversion rate is 12% versus 11% for Qatar SC, which raises the probability that the hosts will break the deadlock in the second half. As a result the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1) — I assigned it a 30% chance; I gave 20% to draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X) and 15% to the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match from the start (1/1). Together these three options total 65% of the distribution and reflect Qatar SC’s defensive resilience in the first half and Al Arabi’s strengths after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Arabi | Qatar SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Arabi is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.84 goals / match - Al Arabi · 1.58 goals / match - Qatar SC
Qatar SC is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.79 goals / match - Al Arabi · 1.58 goals / match - Qatar SC
Al Arabi scores in 95% of matches (18 of 19 matches), while Qatar SC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
Qatar SC scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Al Arabi keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Arabi
Over / Under - Qatar SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Arabi is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / match - Al Arabi · 1.42 pts / match - Qatar SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Arabi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qatar SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Arabi
Qatar SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).
Teams vs league
| Al Arabi | Liga | Qatar SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.63 | 3.32 | ▼ 3.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 64% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 22% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 71% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 87% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Arabi 1 - 0 - 0 Qatar SC. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Arabi vs Qatar SC?
The Stars League match finished Al Arabi 1:1 Qatar SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Arabi vs Qatar SC?
Al Arabi score 1.84 goals per game on average and Qatar SC 1.58. The Stars League average is 3.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Al Arabi's matches and 63% of Qatar SC's.
What form are Al Arabi and Qatar SC in?
Over the last 5 games Al Arabi have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Qatar SC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Arabi vs Qatar SC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


