Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Al Hazm vs Dhamk: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Dhamk crest
Dhamk
135%(1.95)
X40%(3.18)
225%(4.18)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest between two weak league teams. Al Hazm sits in 11th place but has disastrous home form with 71% losses and only 14% wins, conceding an average of 2.43 goals per match. Dhamk, in 15th position, presents even poorer form, yet they draw 50% of away matches and have a slightly better conceded goals ratio (2.0 vs 2.43). Both teams have a negative goal difference and terrible form in the last five matches (Al Hazm: 0.8 PPG, Dhamk: 0.4 PPG). The low xG values of both teams and Dhamk's high percentage of away draws suggest the match will end in a share of points in an unspectacular style.

Al Hazm vs Dhamk: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hazm played Dhamk in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 26 January 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Al Hazm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Dhamk: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hazm scores 1.06 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Dhamk scores 0.81 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hazm 63%, Dhamk 75%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 63%, Dhamk 38%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hazm has higher xG: 1.26 vs 0.96. Al Hazm: 11.2 shots per match, Dhamk: 8.8.

Match halves

Al Hazm: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Dhamk: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.31.

Goals by minute

Al Hazm: 46-60 (5 goals). Dhamk: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest between two weak league teams. Al Hazm sits in 11th place but has disastrous home form with 71% losses and only 14% wins, conceding an average of 2.43 goals per match. Dhamk, in 15th position, presents even poorer form, yet they draw 50% of away matches and have a slightly better conceded goals ratio (2.0 vs 2.43). Both teams have a negative goal difference and terrible form in the last five matches (Al Hazm: 0.8 PPG, Dhamk: 0.4 PPG). The low xG values of both teams and Dhamk's high percentage of away draws suggest the match will end in a share of points in an unspectacular style.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Al HazmDhamk
8Shots10
Al HazmDhamk
3Shots on target4
Al HazmDhamk
1.23xG1.08
Al HazmDhamk
5Corners3
Al HazmDhamk
70Dangerous attacks22
Al HazmDhamk
10Fouls14
Al HazmDhamk
2Cards5
Al HazmDhamk

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.06Goals scored / match0.81
Al HazmDhamk
1.81Goals conceded / match1.75
Al HazmDhamk
46%Average possession46%
Al HazmDhamk
3.88Shots on target / match2.31
Al HazmDhamk

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.19Shots per match8.75
Al HazmDhamk
3.88Shots on target2.31
Al HazmDhamk
9.5%Shot conversion9.3%
Al HazmDhamk
46%Possession46%
Al HazmDhamk
1.26xG for0.96
Al HazmDhamk
1.45xG against1.52
Al HazmDhamk

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedDhamk: Balanced
Al HazmDhamk
Accuracy (shots on target)35%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hazm is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Al Hazm · 0.4 pts / match - Dhamk

Al Hazm
LLWLD
Season result split
25% W31% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-7
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Dhamk
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W50% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-8-7
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hazm is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Al Hazm · 0.81 goals / match - Dhamk

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Dhamk keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Dhamk scoring profile: very strong

Dhamk scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

17Goals scored (season)13
Al HazmDhamk
29Goals conceded (season)28
Al HazmDhamk
2.88Average goals in match2.56
Al HazmDhamk
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Al HazmDhamk
14Goals conceded (last 5)10
Al HazmDhamk

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal81%
Al HazmDhamk
38%2 goals0%
Al HazmDhamk
6%3 goals0%
Al HazmDhamk
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmDhamk

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
Al HazmDhamk
56%2 goals44%
Al HazmDhamk
19%3 goals19%
Al HazmDhamk
13%4 goals13%
Al HazmDhamk

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time44%
Al HazmDhamk
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HazmDhamk
6%Scored in both halves0%
Al HazmDhamk

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Al HazmDhamk
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Al HazmDhamk
80%BTTS - last 560%
Al HazmDhamk

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Al HazmDhamk
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Al HazmDhamk
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Al HazmDhamk

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Al HazmDhamk
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Al HazmDhamk
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Al HazmDhamk

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hazm is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 0.75 pts / match - Dhamk

Al Hazm - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
Dhamk - half-time state
6% leading56% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.75
Al HazmDhamk
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Al HazmDhamk
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Al HazmDhamk
1Average goals (1st half)1.38
Al HazmDhamk
50%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Al HazmDhamk
75%No goal before half-time50%
Al HazmDhamk

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)0.81
Al HazmDhamk
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.31
Al HazmDhamk
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Al HazmDhamk
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.19
Al HazmDhamk
31%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Al HazmDhamk
56%No goal after half-time69%
Al HazmDhamk

Al Hazm - second-half results

19% W38% D44% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dhamk - second-half results

6% W63% D31% L
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match0.83.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Dhamk - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Dhamk
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
1
7
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Dhamk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaDhamk
Average goals in match 2.883.08 2.56
Both teams scored 63%62% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%59% 38%
Clean sheets 13%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 56%73% 81%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Nawaf Al HabashiOff: Miguel Carvallho Vianna
  2. DhamkYellow cardDhari Sayyar Al Anazi
  3. DhamkYellow cardKhaled Al Samiri
  4. DhamkYellow cardKewin Oliveira Silva
  5. DhamkSubstitutionOn: Yakou Meu00eftu00e9Off: Khaled Al Samiri
  6. Al HazmYellow cardAbdullah Al-Shanqiti
  7. DhamkSubstitutionOn: Riyadh SharahiliOff: Yahya Mahdi Naji
  8. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Omar Jihad Al SomahOff: Fábio Santos Martins
  9. DhamkYellow cardYakou Meu00eftu00e9

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 0 Dhamk. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Dhamk
1 : 1
Al Hazm

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Dhamk?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 2:1 Dhamk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Dhamk?

Al Hazm score 1.06 goals per game on average and Dhamk 0.81. The Professional League average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Al Hazm's matches and 75% of Dhamk's.

What form are Al Hazm and Dhamk in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Dhamk 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Dhamk?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.