Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Neom SC crest
Neom SC
120%(3.54)
X25%(3.35)
255%(1.93)

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hazm played Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 4 January 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Al Hazm: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Neom SC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hazm scores 0.91 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.45 and concedes 1.64. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hazm 55%, Neom SC 82%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 45%, Neom SC 64%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.17. Al Hazm: 10.2 shots per match, Neom SC: 12.7.

Match halves

Al Hazm: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36. Neom SC: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Al Hazm: 31-45+ (4 goals). Neom SC: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Neom SC demonstrates significantly better away form with a 60% win rate and an impressive goal average of 1.8 per match. Al Hazm finds itself in a dramatic situation at home—0% wins, a staggering 75% loss rate, and only 0.25 goals scored on average per game. The visitors also dominate offensive statistics: 4.4 shots on target per match compared to 3.25 for the hosts, along with a higher xG (1.31 vs 1.13). Additionally, Neom SC controls possession at 54% and shows superior chance conversion (14% vs 2%). Given Al Hazm's disastrous home streak (dlll) and the visitors' solid away form (lwwwd), a victory for Neom SC is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Al HazmNeom SC
12Shots10
Al HazmNeom SC
1Shots on target5
Al HazmNeom SC
1.26xG1.2
Al HazmNeom SC
2Corners3
Al HazmNeom SC
60Dangerous attacks29
Al HazmNeom SC
14Fouls11
Al HazmNeom SC
0Cards1
Al HazmNeom SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.91Goals scored / match1.45
Al HazmNeom SC
1.36Goals conceded / match1.64
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Average possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
4Shots on target / match4.45
Al HazmNeom SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.18Shots per match12.73
Al HazmNeom SC
4Shots on target4.45
Al HazmNeom SC
8.9%Shot conversion11.4%
Al HazmNeom SC
46%Possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
1.17xG for1.34
Al HazmNeom SC
1.51xG against1.21
Al HazmNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedNeom SC: Balanced
Al HazmNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hazm is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.4 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W36% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-4
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
DLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Neom SC
WLDWL
Season result split
45% W18% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-4
1.55 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Neom SC is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.45 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.64 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

10Goals scored (season)16
Al HazmNeom SC
15Goals conceded (season)18
Al HazmNeom SC
2.27Average goals in match3.09
Al HazmNeom SC
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Al HazmNeom SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal91%
Al HazmNeom SC
36%2 goals36%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%3 goals18%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal91%
Al HazmNeom SC
36%2 goals45%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%3 goals27%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time36%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%BTTS in both halves18%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%Scored in both halves27%
Al HazmNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al HazmNeom SC
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Al HazmNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Al HazmNeom SC

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time73%
Al HazmNeom SC
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Al HazmNeom SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.55 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.55
Al HazmNeom SC
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Al HazmNeom SC
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Al HazmNeom SC
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.36
Al HazmNeom SC
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC
64%No goal before half-time45%
Al HazmNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1
Al HazmNeom SC
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Al HazmNeom SC
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Al HazmNeom SC
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Al HazmNeom SC
36%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Al HazmNeom SC
73%No goal after half-time36%
Al HazmNeom SC

Al Hazm - second-half results

9% W55% D36% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - second-half results

9% W73% D18% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaNeom SC
Average goals in match 2.273.05 3.09
Both teams scored 55%62% 82%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%56% 64%
Clean sheets 18%22% 9%
Goal before half-time 55%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 64%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Neom SCYellow cardAli Hassan Al Asmari
  2. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Amir SayoudOff: Miguel Carvallho Vianna
  3. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Salman Mohammed Al FarajOff: Alaa Hejji
  4. Al HazmGoalAmir Sayoud

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Khald AlahmariMatches officiated: 8
3.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins38%Draws25%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:2 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

Al Hazm score 0.91 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.45. The Professional League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Al Hazm's matches and 82% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Hazm and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Neom SC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.