Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Al Hikma vs Safa: match statistics

Al Hikma crest
Al Hikma
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Safa crest
Safa
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

Al Hikma vs Safa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hikma played Safa in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Al Hikma: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Safa: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hikma scores 1.08 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Safa scores 1.15 and concedes 0.62. League average: 2.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hikma 31%, Safa 23%. Over 2.5: Al Hikma 46%, Safa 15%. League level: BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.02 vs 0.99. Al Hikma: 6.8 shots per match, Safa: 5.0.

Match halves

Al Hikma: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.54. Safa: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Al Hikma: 61-75 (6 goals). Safa: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.20 goals per match, BTTS 29%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Al HikmaSafa
7Shots12
Al HikmaSafa
5Shots on target7
Al HikmaSafa
1.11xG1.55
Al HikmaSafa
6Corners3
Al HikmaSafa
43Dangerous attacks41
Al HikmaSafa
-1Fouls-1
Al HikmaSafa
-1Cards-1
Al HikmaSafa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.08Goals scored / match1.15
Al HikmaSafa
1.23Goals conceded / match0.62
Al HikmaSafa
49%Average possession45%
Al HikmaSafa
3.31Shots on target / match2.38
Al HikmaSafa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.85Shots per match5
Al HikmaSafa
3.31Shots on target2.38
Al HikmaSafa
15.7%Shot conversion23.1%
Al HikmaSafa
49%Possession45%
Al HikmaSafa
1.02xG for0.99
Al HikmaSafa
0.97xG against1.1
Al HikmaSafa

Shooting quality

Al Hikma: Efficient finishingSafa: Counter-attacking
Al HikmaSafa
Accuracy (shots on target)48%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Safa is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Al Hikma · 1.8 pts / match - Safa

Al Hikma
LDLWL
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Safa
LLWWW
Season result split
46% W15% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-5
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Al Hikma · 1.15 goals / match - Safa

Safa is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.23 goals / match - Al Hikma · 0.62 goals / match - Safa

Al Hikma scoring profile: strong

Al Hikma scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

Safa scoring profile: mixed

Safa scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 matches).

14Goals scored (season)15
Al HikmaSafa
16Goals conceded (season)8
Al HikmaSafa
2.31Average goals in match1.77
Al HikmaSafa
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Al HikmaSafa
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
Al HikmaSafa

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal54%
Al HikmaSafa
31%2 goals31%
Al HikmaSafa
8%3 goals8%
Al HikmaSafa
0%4 goals8%
Al HikmaSafa

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal62%
Al HikmaSafa
46%2 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa
23%3 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa
8%4 goals0%
Al HikmaSafa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time0%
Al HikmaSafa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HikmaSafa
23%Scored in both halves23%
Al HikmaSafa

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Al HikmaSafa
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al HikmaSafa
20%BTTS - last 50%
Al HikmaSafa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time31%
Al HikmaSafa
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Al HikmaSafa
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Al HikmaSafa

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al HikmaSafa
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
Al HikmaSafa
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Al HikmaSafa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Al Hikma · 1.62 pts / match - Safa

Al Hikma - half-time state
31% leading23% draw46% trailing
Safa - half-time state
31% leading69% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.62
Al HikmaSafa
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Al HikmaSafa
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0
Al HikmaSafa
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.54
Al HikmaSafa
54%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Al HikmaSafa
54%No goal before half-time69%
Al HikmaSafa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Al HikmaSafa
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Al HikmaSafa
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Al HikmaSafa
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Al HikmaSafa
62%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al HikmaSafa
54%No goal after half-time54%
Al HikmaSafa

Al Hikma - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Safa - second-half results

38% W23% R38% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Safa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Safa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
6
0
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al HikmaLigaSafa
Average goals in match 2.312.20 1.77
Both teams scored 31%29% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%38% 15%
Clean sheets 54%43% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%57% 31%
Goal after half-time 69%74% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per match
29%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hikma 0 - 1 - 0 Safa. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Safa
0 : 0
Al Hikma

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hikma vs Safa?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Hikma 1:2 Safa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hikma vs Safa?

Al Hikma score 1.08 goals per game on average and Safa 1.15. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Al Hikma's matches and 23% of Safa's.

What form are Al Hikma and Safa in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hikma have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Safa 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hikma vs Safa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.