Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Hikma vs Safa: match statistics

Al Hikma crest
Al Hikma
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Safa crest
Safa
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

Al Hikma vs Safa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hikma play Safa in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match date is 6 February 2026 at 13:15. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Al Hikma: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Safa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hikma scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Safa scores 1.43 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hikma 43%, Safa 39%. Over 2.5: Al Hikma 52%, Safa 35%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.05 vs 1.02. Al Hikma: 5.8 shots per match, Safa: 5.7.

Match halves

Al Hikma: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.57. Safa: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Al Hikma: 31-45+ (8 goals). Safa: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Al Hikma presents solid home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive record of 60% clean sheets at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.6 goals per match in home games with a favorable shot conversion rate of 29%. Safa has serious problems in away matches, winning just 20% of meetings and failing to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 1 goal per match. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 60% of away matches, which, combined with a low xG (0.7), indicates offensive difficulties. Despite Safa's better overall form in the last 5 matches, their weakness in away games and Al Hikma's dominance on their own turf argue for a victory for the hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Al HikmaSafa
7Shots12
Al HikmaSafa
5Shots on target7
Al HikmaSafa
1.11xG1.55
Al HikmaSafa
6Corners3
Al HikmaSafa
43Dangerous attacks41
Al HikmaSafa
-1Fouls-1
Al HikmaSafa
-1Cards-1
Al HikmaSafa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match1.43
Al HikmaSafa
1.3Goals conceded / match0.96
Al HikmaSafa
45%Average possession48%
Al HikmaSafa
3.3Shots on target / match2.91
Al HikmaSafa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.78Shots per match5.7
Al HikmaSafa
3.3Shots on target2.91
Al HikmaSafa
22.6%Shot conversion25.2%
Al HikmaSafa
45%Possession48%
Al HikmaSafa
1.05xG for1.02
Al HikmaSafa
0.99xG against1.13
Al HikmaSafa

Shooting quality

Al Hikma: Counter-attackingSafa: Efficient finishing
Al HikmaSafa
Accuracy (shots on target)57%51%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Safa is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Al Hikma · 2 pts / match - Safa

Al Hikma
LDWWL
Season result split
39% W13% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 0.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Safa
WWLDW
Season result split
52% W13% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-8
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma · 1.43 goals / match - Safa

Safa is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma · 0.96 goals / match - Safa

Al Hikma scoring profile: strong

Al Hikma scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Safa scoring profile: strong

Safa scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

30Goals scored (season)33
Al HikmaSafa
30Goals conceded (season)22
Al HikmaSafa
2.61Average goals in match2.39
Al HikmaSafa
11Goals scored (last 5)11
Al HikmaSafa
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Al HikmaSafa

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
Al HikmaSafa
35%2 goals39%
Al HikmaSafa
17%3 goals13%
Al HikmaSafa
9%4 goals13%
Al HikmaSafa

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal65%
Al HikmaSafa
43%2 goals13%
Al HikmaSafa
17%3 goals9%
Al HikmaSafa
4%4 goals9%
Al HikmaSafa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time4%
Al HikmaSafa
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HikmaSafa
17%Scored in both halves30%
Al HikmaSafa

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Al HikmaSafa
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Al HikmaSafa
60%BTTS - last 560%
Al HikmaSafa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
Al HikmaSafa
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Al HikmaSafa
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Al HikmaSafa

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Al HikmaSafa
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Al HikmaSafa
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Al HikmaSafa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Al Hikma · 1.61 pts / match - Safa

Al Hikma - half-time state
30% leading39% draw30% trailing
Safa - half-time state
35% leading57% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.61
Al HikmaSafa
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Al HikmaSafa
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Al HikmaSafa
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.87
Al HikmaSafa
57%Clean sheet before half-time91%
Al HikmaSafa
52%No goal before half-time61%
Al HikmaSafa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Al HikmaSafa
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Al HikmaSafa
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
Al HikmaSafa
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Al HikmaSafa
48%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Al HikmaSafa
61%No goal after half-time39%
Al HikmaSafa

Al Hikma - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
30
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Safa - second-half results

39% W22% R39% P
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Safa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Safa
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
10
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al HikmaLigaSafa
Average goals in match 2.612.44 2.39
Both teams scored 43%33% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%43% 35%
Clean sheets 35%39% 35%
Goal before half-time 65%57% 43%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hikma 0 - 1 - 0 Safa. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Safa
0 : 0
Al Hikma

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hikma vs Safa?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Hikma 1:2 Safa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hikma vs Safa?

Al Hikma score 1.30 goals per game on average and Safa 1.43. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Al Hikma's matches and 39% of Safa's.

What form are Al Hikma and Safa in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hikma have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Safa 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hikma vs Safa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.