Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines: match statistics
Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Hilal Omdurman played Marines in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Al Hilal Omdurman: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Marines: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Hilal Omdurman scores 2.32 and concedes 0.72 goals per match. Marines scores 1.32 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.06 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Hilal Omdurman 44%, Marines 56%. Over 2.5: Al Hilal Omdurman 60%, Marines 40%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Al Hilal Omdurman has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.20. Al Hilal Omdurman: 7.3 shots per match, Marines: 7.0.
Match halves
Al Hilal Omdurman: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.36. Marines: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
Al Hilal Omdurman: 61-75 (15 goals). Marines: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National Soccer League: 2.06 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Hilal Omdurman are the favorites: at home they have a 71% win rate, average 2.64 goals scored per match and concede only 0.64 goals, and have scored 56 goals in the season. Marines sit 10th; away they average 1.23 goals scored, concede 1.38 and keep just 23% clean sheets, indicating a weaker defense on the road. Al Hilal’s home efficiency is high: shot conversion rate 38% and on average 3.92 shots on target per match, while Marines away convert at 15% with 3.69 shots on target, so the hosts convert chances into goals far more often. xG shows 1.26 for Al Hilal at home versus 1.34 for Marines away, meaning Marines create valuable chances, but their lower conversion and higher average goals conceded (1.38) undermine that advantage. In the last 5 matches Al Hilal are 3-1-1 and average 2.0 points per game, Marines are 2-2-1 and 1.6 points per game; considering goal differential (56 vs 33), better defense and high clean sheet rate (64% vs 23%), I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 58% (Al Hilal Omdurman) and 54% (Marines), and in the last 5 matches these are 60% and 100% respectively. Marines scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 avg) and conceded 10 (2.0 avg); seasonally they have xG_for 1.34 and xG_against 1.25 and 3.69 shots on target per game, indicating high offensive activity and defensive vulnerability. Al Hilal scores 1.42 and concedes 0.92 seasonally; in the last 5 matches they scored 7 goals (1.4 avg) and conceded 4 (0.8 avg), with recent xG 1.16 vs xG_against 0.92, so they can create chances and less frequently concede clean sheets. Clean sheets occur in only 33% and 23% of matches (Al Hilal and Marines), and the combined seasonal goals average 1.42+1.23=2.65, above the league average 2.07, which reduces the likelihood of a goalless result. Based on this I give a strong signal for BTTS: I assess the probability of both teams scoring at 75% vs 25% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on home xG 1.03 and away xG 1.34, and opponent xG 0.97 (home) and 1.25 (away), I expect approximately 1.14 goals for Al Hilal and 1.16 for Marines, totaling ~2.30 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.30 prices probability of Over 1.5 goals at ~67%, Over 2.5 at ~40% and 4+ goals at only ~20%. Seasonal figures confirm a moderate scoring profile: Over 1.5 occurs in 67% of home games and 77% of away games, Over 2.5 in 42% and 38%, and Over 3.5 only in 25% and 15%, which strengthens the signal for Under 3.5. Additionally, the home side concedes on average 0.92 goals per match, Marines concede 1.38, and in their last 5 matches Marines scored 2.2 and conceded 2.0 on average, indicating higher volatility, yet the expected total remains well below 3.5. As a result, the strongest data-driven signal is Under 3.5 (under ≈80%), while Over 1.5 (≈67%) remains possible but less certain.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side shows a clear lead at the break: they led at half-time in 7 of 12 home matches (58%) and average 0.92 goals in the first half while conceding only 0.25, whereas Marines average 0.69 scored and 0.46 conceded at half-time. Over the full match Al Hilal Omdurman win 50% of home games (6 of 12) with 33% draws, average 1.42 goals versus opponents’ 1.23, and concede 0.92 goals per home match compared to Marines’ 1.38, which favors maintaining a lead and a home full-time win. On the other hand Marines generate higher xG (1.34 vs 1.03) and produce more shots and shots on target (8.0 and 3.69 vs 7.2 and 2.3), so they create chances, but their conversion rate of 15% versus the home side’s 17% and seasonal BTTS of 54% vs 58% indicate this does not determine away dominance. Therefore the primary scenario is a home lead at half-time and a home win at full-time (1/1) at 43% probability; alternatives are half-time draw/full-time draw at 13% and an away win despite leading at the break at 9%, reflecting both the 58% home half-time leads and 50% home wins.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Marines | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.68 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Hilal Omdurman is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Al Hilal Omdurman · 1.6 pts / match - Marines
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hilal Omdurman is 76% better for: goals scored per match.
2.32 goals / match - Al Hilal Omdurman · 1.32 goals / match - Marines
Al Hilal Omdurman is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.72 goals / match - Al Hilal Omdurman · 1.16 goals / match - Marines
Al Hilal Omdurman scores in 96% of matches (24 of 25 matches), while Marines keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
Marines scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Al Hilal Omdurman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (14 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hilal Omdurman
Over / Under - Marines
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hilal Omdurman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 72%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Marines - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Hilal Omdurman
Marines
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Liga | Marines | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.04 | 2.06 | ▲ 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | • 44% | 45% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 35% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 34% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 61% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al Hilal OmdurmanGoalEmmanuel Flomo
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Hilal Omdurman 0 - 1 - 0 Marines. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines?
The National Soccer League match finished Al Hilal Omdurman 1:1 Marines. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines?
Al Hilal Omdurman score 2.32 goals per game on average and Marines 1.32. The National Soccer League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Al Hilal Omdurman's matches and 56% of Marines's.
What form are Al Hilal Omdurman and Marines in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hilal Omdurman have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Marines 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines?
The statistical background for Al Hilal Omdurman vs Marines — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


