Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon: match statistics

Al Ittifaq crest
Al Ittifaq
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon
130%(2.53)
X25%(3.40)
245%(2.44)

Al Taawon presents decidedly better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+7), while Al Ittifaq achieves only 33% wins at home with a negative balance (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.89 goals away with an efficiency of 19%, which surpasses the hosts (1.33 goals, 16% efficiency). Al Ittifaq has a high draw rate at home (44%), making this result probable as well. The xG statistics show that Al Taawon generates more chances (1.15 xG) than Al Ittifaq (1.0 xG), while simultaneously defending better (1.11 goals conceded away vs 1.56 for the hosts). The recent form of both teams is similar (1.4 PPG), however, Al Taawon occupies a higher position in the table (5th place vs 7th) and has a better overall season record (12-2-4 vs 8-5-5), which argues for their victory.

Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Ittifaq play Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 3 February 2026 at 18:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Al Ittifaq: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Taawon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Ittifaq scores 1.50 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.74 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Ittifaq 56%, Al Taawon 65%. Over 2.5: Al Ittifaq 59%, Al Taawon 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Al Taawon has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.21. Al Ittifaq: 10.3 shots per match, Al Taawon: 11.8.

Match halves

Al Ittifaq: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.85. Al Taawon: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Al Ittifaq: 46-60 (11 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Al Taawon presents decidedly better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+7), while Al Ittifaq achieves only 33% wins at home with a negative balance (-2). The visitors score an average of 1.89 goals away with an efficiency of 19%, which surpasses the hosts (1.33 goals, 16% efficiency). Al Ittifaq has a high draw rate at home (44%), making this result probable as well. The xG statistics show that Al Taawon generates more chances (1.15 xG) than Al Ittifaq (1.0 xG), while simultaneously defending better (1.11 goals conceded away vs 1.56 for the hosts). The recent form of both teams is similar (1.4 PPG), however, Al Taawon occupies a higher position in the table (5th place vs 7th) and has a better overall season record (12-2-4 vs 8-5-5), which argues for their victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
11Shots17
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
3Shots on target4
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.21xG1.72
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
2Corners5
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
42Dangerous attacks51
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
15Fouls8
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
5Cards1
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.5Goals scored / match1.74
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.62Goals conceded / match1.35
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
49%Average possession52%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
4.35Shots on target / match4.12
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.35Shots per match11.79
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
4.35Shots on target4.12
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
14.5%Shot conversion14.7%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
49%Possession52%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.21xG for1.32
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.67xG against1.47
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Shooting quality

Al Ittifaq: Efficient finishingAl Taawon: Efficient finishing
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
Accuracy (shots on target)42%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ittifaq is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Al Ittifaq · 0.8 pts / match - Al Taawon

Al Ittifaq
WDWLD
Season result split
41% W24% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-12
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Al Taawon
LWLDL
Season result split
44% W24% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-11
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.74 goals / match - Al Taawon

Al Taawon is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.35 goals / match - Al Taawon

Al Ittifaq scoring profile: very strong

Al Ittifaq scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).

51Goals scored (season)59
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
55Goals conceded (season)46
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
3.12Average goals in match3.09
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
10Goals scored (last 5)7
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal82%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
44%2 goals47%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
21%3 goals21%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
9%4 goals12%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal82%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
47%2 goals41%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
26%3 goals6%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
12%4 goals3%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time21%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
32%Scored in both halves29%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
60%BTTS - last 560%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Al Ittifaq · 1.5 pts / match - Al Taawon

Al Ittifaq - half-time state
29% leading35% draw35% trailing
Al Taawon - half-time state
38% leading35% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.5
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.74
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.21
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
47%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
53%No goal before half-time50%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)1
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
47%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon
41%No goal after half-time38%
Al IttifaqAl Taawon

Al Ittifaq - second-half results

35% W26% R38% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - second-half results

32% W41% R26% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ittifaq - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Ittifaq
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
7
16-30
7
12
31-45
11
8
46-60
8
11
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
11
9
46-60
15
6
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Ittifaq

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al IttifaqLigaAl Taawon
Average goals in match 3.123.01 3.09
Both teams scored 56%58% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 53%
Clean sheets 26%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%75% 74%
Goal after half-time 82%80% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Ittifaq 0 - 0 - 1 Al Taawon. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Al Taawon
4 : 1
Al Ittifaq

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?

The Professional League match finished Al Ittifaq 1:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?

Al Ittifaq score 1.50 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.74. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Al Ittifaq's matches and 65% of Al Taawon's.

What form are Al Ittifaq and Al Taawon in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ittifaq have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Taawon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon?

The statistical background for Al Ittifaq vs Al Taawon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.