Al Ittihad vs Neom SC: match statistics
Al Ittihad vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ittihad play Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 8 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 3:4.
Current form
Al Ittihad: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ittihad scores 1.62 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ittihad 59%, Neom SC 65%. Over 2.5: Al Ittihad 50%, Neom SC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ittihad has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.43. Al Ittihad: 13.3 shots per match, Neom SC: 13.0.
Match halves
Al Ittihad: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.79. Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Al Ittihad: 76-90+ (14 goals). Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Ittihad holds a clear statistical advantage: across the season they have scored 42 goals versus Neom’s 32, and at home they generate an average xG of 1.74 compared to Neom’s 1.32 on the road. The hosts average 14.31 shots per game with 5.31 on target, while Neom averages 11.85 shots and 4.62 on target; the conversion rate is 9% for the hosts versus 10% for the visitors, indicating Neom is slightly more efficient with fewer attempts. Defensively the hosts concede 0.85 goals per home game versus 1.15 conceded by Neom away, and the clean sheet rate is 38% vs 15%, which favors Al Ittihad’s defensive solidity. Form over the last 5 matches also favors the hosts (PPG 1.4 vs 1.0; goals in the last 5 matches 6 vs 5), although both teams failed to score in 31% of their fixtures. Considering the superiority in possession (61% vs 53%), greater chance volume and better xG, I tip Al Ittihad to win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ittihad | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ittihad is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Al Ittihad · 1.2 pts / match - Neom SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ittihad is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.62 goals / match - Al Ittihad · 1.26 goals / match - Neom SC
Al Ittihad scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).
Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Ittihad
Over / Under — Neom SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ittihad is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Al Ittihad · 1.41 pts / match - Neom SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ittihad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ittihad
Neom SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ittihad | Liga | Neom SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.03 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 26% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 80% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Ittihad 1 - 0 - 0 Neom SC. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ittihad vs Neom SC?
The Professional League match finished Al Ittihad 3:4 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittihad vs Neom SC?
Al Ittihad score 1.62 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.26. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Al Ittihad's matches and 65% of Neom SC's.
What form are Al Ittihad and Neom SC in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ittihad have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Neom SC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittihad vs Neom SC?
The statistical background for Al Ittihad vs Neom SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.