Al Ittihad vs Petrojet: match statistics
Al Ittihad vs Petrojet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ittihad played Petrojet in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 4 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al Ittihad: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Petrojet: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ittihad scores 0.81 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Petrojet scores 1.00 and concedes 1.11. League average: 1.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ittihad 44%, Petrojet 56%. Over 2.5: Al Ittihad 41%, Petrojet 37%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Petrojet has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.19. Al Ittihad: 9.9 shots per match, Petrojet: 11.8.
Match halves
Al Ittihad: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56. Petrojet: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Al Ittihad: 76-90+ (9 goals). Petrojet: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw. Petrojet records as many as 57% draws on the road and both teams have very similar goals averages — Al Ittihad scores 1.00 at home, Petrojet 0.86 away. Hosts have an edge in game control and quality of chances (53% possession, 3.5 shots on target per match and 10% conversion) versus the visitors (46% possession, 3.0 SoT and 7% conversion), which increases the hosts’ likelihood of converting opportunities. xG, however, presents an even picture (1.27 for Al Ittihad at home vs 1.37 for Petrojet away), and in the last 5 matches the hosts are 1-3-1, scoring 6 and conceding 8, while Petrojet are 2-1-2 with a 4–5 goal record. Additionally, Petrojet have a slightly better points average in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 1.2), and average goals conceded are similar (1.08 Al Ittihad at home vs 1.14 Petrojet away), so defenses do not provide a clear advantage. As a result, I expect an even match with a draw and estimate probabilities: home 35%, draw 45%, away 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates: Al Ittihad 54% and Petrojet 57%, averaging around 55% versus a league mean of 46%, so the baseline signal favors BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches Al Ittihad shows an 80% BTTS rate compared to 40% for Petrojet; Ittihad scored 6 and conceded 8 in those five, while Petrojet scored 4 and conceded 5, which supports maintaining BTTS due to the home side's weaker defense. xG indicates similar attacking activity (seasonal xG_for 1.31 vs 1.37, last 5 xG_for 1.35 vs 1.36), while defenses allow 1.45 (Ittihad) and 1.30 (Petrojet) xG respectively, so chances for both sides are realistic. Shot and conversion stats also favor scoring: Ittihad averages 3.77 shots on target with 10% conversion, Petrojet 3.0 SoT with 7% conversion, and both teams concede roughly 1.1 goals per game (1.08 vs 1.14). Considering the average BTTS ~55% and the strong 80% signal in the home side's last 5, I estimate 65% for 'both teams to score' and 35% for the opposite scenario; therefore the best pick is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and averages I expect 1.31 goals for Al Ittihad and 1.41 for Petrojet, yielding a total of 2.72 expected goals. Season metrics show Al Ittihad has Over 1.5 in 62% of matches, Petrojet in 71% (average 66.5%), and the percentage of matches with over 0.5 goals (i.e., at least 1 goal) is 92% for the home side and 79% for the visitors, which supports the Over 1.5 scenario. Season Over 2.5 rates are 46% for the home team and 29% for the away team, giving a conservative signal at that line, but with total xG = 2.72 the Poisson distribution gives about a 75.5% chance for Over 1.5 and about 51.1% for Over 2.5. Additionally both teams have a high percentage of BTTS games: 54% (Al Ittihad) and 57% (Petrojet), and Al Ittihad averages 11.31 shots (3.77 on target) with a 10% conversion rate, which increases the likelihood of goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over, line 1.5) with an assessed probability of ~76%, while Over 2.5 has only a slim edge (~51%) and Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Ittihad draws at half-time in 62% of home matches and leads at the break in 38%, having never trailed at half-time (0%), with an average goals conceded by half-time of only 0.08, which strongly suggests a draw or a home lead after 45 minutes. Petrojet win only 14% of away matches and draw 57%, with average away goals of 0.86 versus 1.15 for home teams, so after a half-time draw Al Ittihad has a higher probability of a final victory. The hosts have better efficiency (shot conversion rate 10% vs 7%) and more shots on target (3.77 vs 3.0), while xG is similar (1.31 vs 1.37), indicating an efficiency advantage for Al Ittihad. Additionally, Al Ittihad keep a clean sheet at half-time in 92% of matches and BTTS at half-time occurs rarely seasonally (8% vs 7%), increasing the likelihood of a low-scoring, draw first half and a home win in the second half; therefore I prefer the X/1 scenario over X/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ittihad | Petrojet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Petrojet is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Al Ittihad · 1.4 pts / match - Petrojet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Petrojet is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Al Ittihad · 1 goals / match - Petrojet
Petrojet is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.22 goals / match - Al Ittihad · 1.11 goals / match - Petrojet
Al Ittihad scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Petrojet keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Petrojet scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Ittihad
Over / Under - Petrojet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Petrojet is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / match - Al Ittihad · 1.48 pts / match - Petrojet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ittihad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Petrojet - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ittihad
Petrojet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ittihad | Liga | Petrojet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.04 | 1.99 | ▲ 2.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 41% | 33% | ▲ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | • 56% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 70% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Ittihad 0 - 0 - 1 Petrojet. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ittihad vs Petrojet?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Al Ittihad 1:2 Petrojet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ittihad vs Petrojet?
Al Ittihad score 0.81 goals per game on average and Petrojet 1.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Al Ittihad's matches and 56% of Petrojet's.
What form are Al Ittihad and Petrojet in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ittihad have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Petrojet 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ittihad vs Petrojet?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


