Al-Jndal vs Al Ula: match statistics
Al-Jndal vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al-Jndal played Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 14 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al-Jndal: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Ula: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al-Jndal scores 0.93 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.25 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al-Jndal 57%, Al Ula 61%. Over 2.5: Al-Jndal 46%, Al Ula 68%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ula has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.06. Al-Jndal: 8.5 shots per match, Al Ula: 13.5.
Match halves
Al-Jndal: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.71. Al Ula: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Al-Jndal: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Ula: 31-45+ (22 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the visitors Al Ula (3rd) versus hosts Al-Jndal (14th): Al Ula have 17 wins this season, Al-Jndal 7. Al Ula have scored 63 goals this season (away average 2.07 goals/match), while Al-Jndal have 26 goals this season and at home only 0.79 goals on average. The visitors produce 11.57 shots and 4.79 on target away with a conversion rate of 18%, hosts at home 8.86 shots, 3.21 on target and a 9% conversion, which translates into a clear advantage in quality of scoring opportunities. Defensively Al Ula concede 0.93 goals away and keep 43% clean sheets, Al-Jndal concede 1.29 goals at home and have 21% clean sheets; xG also favors the visitors 1.4 vs 1.12, and the hosts fail to score in 36% of home matches versus 14% FTS for the visitors. Based on these numbers and the last 5 matches (Al Ula 13 goals and 1.8 points per match, Al-Jndal 8 goals and 1.6 points per match) I assign a 70% chance to an Al Ula win, 18% to a draw and 12% to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS signals are strong: season BTTS rate for Al-Jndal is 71% versus 50% for Al Ula, and in the last 5 matches the rates are 100% and 80% respectively. Seasonally Al-Jndal scores 2.43 goals and concedes 0.86, Al Ula scores 2.07 and concedes 0.93; in the last 5 matches the home side averaged 1.6 goals and the away side 2.6, with average concessions of 1.2 for both, which suggests goal exchange. xG underlines this picture: hosts have xG_for 1.77 against the visitors' xG_against 1.33, but visitors have xG_for 1.4 versus hosts' xG_against 0.99; additionally hosts generate 6.29 shots on target versus 4.79 for the visitors, and conversion is 16% versus 18% — both sides can turn chances into goals. Counter-arguments are the higher clean sheet rate for Al Ula at 43% versus 29% for Al-Jndal and the fact Al Ula failed to score in 14% of matches this season while Al-Jndal has 0% scoreless games; however recent form favors goal exchange. Considering 100% vs 80% in the last 5, season 71% vs 50% and the league BTTS average 62%, I estimate BTTS probability at about 78% (yes) versus 22% (no) and recommend a BTTS: "yes" bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of approximately 2.75 goals: Al-Jndal ~1.56 (xG_for 1.77 vs xG_against Al Ula 1.33 → ~1.55 ≈1.56) and Al Ula ~1.19 (xG_for 1.40 vs xG_against Al-Jndal 0.99 → ~1.20 ≈1.19). Over 1.5 looks almost certain — home team has 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals, away team 71%; therefore a high probability for Over 1.5. The strongest signal is Over 2.5: Al-Jndal has 79% of season matches >2.5, Al Ula 57%, and the league average for Over 2.5 is 59%; the projected 2.75 is thus above that line, justifying Over 2.5 as the primary recommendation. The last 5 matches confirm attacking form: Al Ula 2.6 goals per game, Al-Jndal 1.6 (combined 4.2 in the last 5), and shot and conversion stats (Al-Jndal 15.57 shots/6.29 SOT/16%, Al Ula 11.57/4.79 SOT/18%) plus BTTS 71%/50% increase the likelihood of goals. I rate Over 3.5 as less likely due to seasonal Over 3.5: 29% for the home side and 50% for the away, hence a lower assessment (~39%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics favor the visitors: in the last 5 matches Al Ula averages 1.2 goals at the break versus 0.2 for Al‑Jndal and led at the break in 40% of those games, while seasonally the visitors have led at the break in 71% of matches versus 57% for the hosts. At the same time Al‑Jndal is stronger over the full match — the hosts’ seasonal goals per game are 2.43 versus 2.07 for the visitors, hosts’ xG is 1.77 versus 1.40, and hosts average 6.29 shots on target versus 4.79 for the visitors. The difference is pronounced after the break: hosts score on average 1.07 goals after half-time versus 0.71 for the visitors and have 86% of matches with at least one goal after the break versus 71% for Al Ula; in the last 5 matches Al‑Jndal has averaged 2.4 points in second halves versus 1.8 points for the visitors. For these reasons the strongest signal is a scenario where Al Ula leads at the break (strong start: 1.2 vs 0.2), but Al‑Jndal completes a turnaround after half-time thanks to superior xG and more shots on target, i.e. HT/FT = 2/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al-Jndal | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Ula is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Al-Jndal · 1.8 pts / match - Al Ula
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ula is 142% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - Al-Jndal · 2.25 goals / match - Al Ula
Al Ula is 92% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - Al-Jndal · 0.89 goals / match - Al Ula
Al-Jndal scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).
Al Ula scores in 93% of matches (26 of 28 matches), while Al-Jndal keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al-Jndal
Over / Under - Al Ula
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ula is 275% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.61 pts / match - Al-Jndal · 2.29 pts / match - Al Ula
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al-Jndal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Ula - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 61%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al-Jndal
Al Ula
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al-Jndal | Liga | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.64 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 62% | • 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 22% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al-Jndal 0 - 0 - 1 Al Ula. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al-Jndal vs Al Ula?
The First Division match finished Al-Jndal 1:2 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al-Jndal vs Al Ula?
Al-Jndal score 0.93 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.25. The First Division average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Al-Jndal's matches and 61% of Al Ula's.
What form are Al-Jndal and Al Ula in?
Over the last 5 games Al-Jndal have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Ula 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al-Jndal vs Al Ula?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al-Jndal vs Al Ula: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.