Al Jubail vs Al Ula: match statistics
Al Jubail vs Al Ula: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Jubail played Al Ula in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al Jubail: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Al Ula: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Jubail scores 0.88 and concedes 2.16 goals per match. Al Ula scores 2.16 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Jubail 50%, Al Ula 63%. Over 2.5: Al Jubail 59%, Al Ula 69%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ula has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.03. Al Jubail: 8.3 shots per match, Al Ula: 13.6.
Match halves
Al Jubail: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.44. Al Ula: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Al Jubail: 0-15 (6 goals). Al Ula: 31-45+ (24 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Ula is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd with 20 wins and 69 goals scored, while Al Jubail are 18th with only 3 wins and 28 goals. The form gap is significant — Al Jubail have lost 5 of their last 5 matches (0 points, 5 scored and 15 conceded), whereas Al Ula in their last 5 have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (7 goals for, 5 against, averaging 2 points per match). Visitors are more efficient offensively: away they average 12.38 shots with 4.75 on target and a 17% conversion (xG 1.47), translating to 2.06 goals per game; hosts at home average 9.94 shots, 3.63 on target, 9% conversion, xG 1.19 and only 0.94 goals per game. Defensively Al Ula also has the edge — Al Jubail concede 1.75 goals at home on average with xG against 1.69, while Al Ula concede 0.94 goals away with xG against 1.32. Considering goal difference (+18 away for Al Ula vs -13 for the hosts), lower share of goalless games (13% vs 38%) and superior shot and conversion metrics, I assess the probabilities at approximately 78% for an away win, 12% for a draw and 10% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators show Al Jubail has BTTS in 69% of matches, Al Ula in 56%, and the league average is 63%, which on a season level favors a Goal/Goal scenario. In the last 5 fixtures the trends are even stronger: Al Jubail has 60% BTTS in the last five, Al Ula 80%, with the visitors scoring 7 goals in those five games, increasing the likelihood that Al Ula will score at least once. The home defense looks poor in the short term — Al Jubail conceded 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game on average), and Al Ula’s recent xG is 1.55, so the visitors are creating real scoring opportunities. Conversely, Al Jubail averages 2.25 goals per season with 1.7 xG and 6.06 shots on target per game, while Al Ula concedes 1.32 xG, so the hosts also have the attributes to score. Considering seasonal BTTS 69%/56%, last 5 matches 60%/80%, xG and shot metrics, I rate BTTS - Yes as more likely at 72% versus 28% and pick 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 1.70 (Al Jubail) + 1.47 (Al Ula) = 3.17 xG, implying about 3.17 expected goals in this match. Seasonal averages confirm an offensive profile: Al Jubail scores 2.25 and concedes 0.81, Al Ula scores 2.06 and concedes 0.94; home matches ended Over 2.5 goals in 75% of games, while away matches did so in 63%. In the last 5 rounds both teams had 80% of matches with Over 2.5 goals, with Al Jubail conceding 15 goals in those 5 games (3.0 per game) and Al Ula conceding 5 (1.0 per game), increasing the likelihood of more goals. Additionally BTTS occurs for the home team in 69% and for the away team in 56% of matches, and average shots on target are 6.06 (home) vs 4.75 (away), confirming both sides create chances and goals are likely; a Poisson model with λ=3.17 yields P(Over 2.5) ≈ 61%. Based on this I recommend choosing Over 2.5 (line 2.5, side: 'over') as the strongest signal, expecting a total of about 3.17 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 2/2 (away team leading at the break and winning the match), because Al Ula leads at half-time in 69% of matches and has a higher HTPPG of 2.31 versus the hosts’ 2.13. In their last five matches Al Ula’s form is 'lwdww' (three wins, 60% win rate), while Al Jubail are 'lllll' (0% wins); in that period the hosts concede an average of 3.0 goals per game and Al Ula 1.0. Seasonally Al Jubail generate higher xG (1.70 vs 1.47) and more shots (14.88 vs 12.38), but both teams have the same average goals by half-time at 1.25, so the hosts’ creative edge may be insufficient given their poor form. Additionally, in the last five matches the hosts concede an average of 1.4 goals by half-time versus only 0.4 for the visitors, which increases the likelihood that Al Ula will lead at the break and maintain the lead to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Jubail | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ula is 145% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Al Jubail · 2.16 goals / match - Al Ula
Al Ula is 145% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.16 goals / match - Al Jubail · 0.88 goals / match - Al Ula
Al Jubail scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).
Al Ula scores in 91% of matches (29 of 32 matches), while Al Jubail keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Jubail
Over / Under - Al Ula
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ula is 164% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.84 pts / match - Al Jubail · 2.22 pts / match - Al Ula
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Jubail - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Ula - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (24 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Jubail
Al Ula
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Jubail | Liga | Al Ula | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.03 | 2.92 | ▲ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 63% | • 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 59% | 60% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 21% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 84% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al JubailYellow cardSaad Othman Al-Bahar
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Jubail 0 - 0 - 1 Al Ula. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Jubail vs Al Ula?
The First Division match finished Al Jubail 1:2 Al Ula. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Jubail vs Al Ula?
Al Jubail score 0.88 goals per game on average and Al Ula 2.16. The First Division average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Al Jubail's matches and 63% of Al Ula's.
What form are Al Jubail and Al Ula in?
Over the last 5 games Al Jubail have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Ula 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Jubail vs Al Ula?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Jubail vs Al Ula: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


