Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq: match statistics
Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Khaleej played Al Ittifaq in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:5.
Current form
Al Khaleej: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Al Ittifaq: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Khaleej scores 1.68 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Al Ittifaq scores 1.42 and concedes 1.65. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Khaleej 65%, Al Ittifaq 55%. Over 2.5: Al Khaleej 65%, Al Ittifaq 58%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Al Khaleej has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.17. Al Khaleej: 11.7 shots per match, Al Ittifaq: 10.0.
Match halves
Al Khaleej: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Ittifaq: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Al Khaleej: 76-90+ (14 goals). Al Ittifaq: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Al Khaleej shows a stronger home attack, scoring on average 1.8 goals per home match versus Al Ittifaq’s 1.27 on the road, with xG 1.31 vs 1.17. The hosts register more shots (11.6 vs 9.8), more on-target attempts (4.07 vs 3.93) and a higher shot conversion rate 16% compared to the visitors’ 13%, increasing the probability of converting opportunities. Defensively Al Khaleej concedes 1.47 goals at home on average, while Al Ittifaq concedes 1.87 away, and clean sheet rates are 20% vs 13%, which gives the hosts a defensive edge. On the other hand the visitors sit 7th versus the hosts’ 11th and have 13 wins this season against Al Khaleej’s 10, and in the last 5 matches the points per game are 1.6 for the hosts and 1.4 for the visitors, so the match could be balanced. Considering the advantage in quality of chances and better defensive metrics at home, I estimate the probabilities as follows: Al Khaleej win ~52%, draw 28%, Al Ittifaq win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario is favored by historical indicators: seasonal BTTS rate is 56% for Al Khaleej and 53% for Al Ittifaq, and in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60%. Scoring stats show a similar picture — Al Khaleej scores 1.56 and concedes 1.44 goals per match on average, while Al Ittifaq scores 1.27 and concedes 1.87; both teams average 4.13 and 3.93 shots on target respectively. xG confirms the scoring potential: seasonal attacking xG for both teams is 1.17, and seasonal xG against is 1.72 (home) and 1.66 (away); in the last 5 matches xG against rises to 1.61 and 1.87, suggesting more chances created for opponents. Additionally the league averages 3.04 goals per match, matches over 2.5 goals occur in 56% (Al Khaleej) and 60% (Al Ittifaq) of cases, and the combination of over 2.5 and BTTS happens in 50% and 47% of matches, so the league environment supports mutual scoring. Considering these figures and the low away clean sheet rate (13%), I assess BTTS probability at 70% for 'Yes' and 30% for 'No', therefore I recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average xG suggest a total of 2.86 goals: Al Khaleej’s attacking xG is 1.17 against Al Ittifaq’s defensive xG of 1.66 (roughly 1.42 for the home side), while Al Ittifaq’s attacking xG 1.17 versus Al Khaleej’s defensive xG 1.72 gives ~1.44 for the away side. Seasonal figures confirm a scoring tendency — Al Khaleej averages 1.56 goals per match, Al Ittifaq concedes 1.87 on average, and the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 75% and 80% (average ~78%). Over 2.5 is moderately likely: season over 2.5 rates are 56% (home) and 60% (away), yielding an estimated ~58% for Over 2.5 given the expected total xG of 2.86. BTTS is 56% for the home team and 53% for the away team, and the last 5 matches show average goals scored of 1.8 and 1.6 respectively, which supports a both teams to score scenario and at least 2 goals in the match. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78%), therefore I recommend backing the Over market at 1.5 as the best probability-to-risk play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side is more likely to be leading at the break: Al Khaleej led at half-time in 6 matches (38%) versus Al Ittifaq in only 2 (13%), and the average goals by the home team before the break are 0.81 compared to 0.40 for the visitors. Over the full match Al Khaleej scores on average 1.56 goals and collects 1.69 points per home game versus 1.27 goals and 1.27 points per game for Al Ittifaq, which favors a full-time win for the hosts. Both teams have identical xG (1.17 vs 1.17), but the visitors are stronger after the break (average points in second halves 1.47 for Al Ittifaq vs 1.25 for Al Khaleej), so there is a risk of a turnaround. Considering a 63% share of clean halves led by the home team at half-time and a higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%), I assign 35% to 1/1 and a significant 22% to the X/1 scenario (draw at half-time, home win), while scenarios beginning with the away team leading receive low probability due to Al Ittifaq historically leading at the break in only 13% of matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Khaleej | Al Ittifaq | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Khaleej is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.68 goals / match - Al Khaleej · 1.42 goals / match - Al Ittifaq
Al Khaleej scores in 74% of matches (23 of 31 matches), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).
Al Ittifaq scores in 71% of matches (22 of 31 matches), while Al Khaleej keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Khaleej
Over / Under - Al Ittifaq
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Khaleej is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - Al Khaleej · 1.16 pts / match - Al Ittifaq
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Khaleej - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Ittifaq - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Khaleej
Al Ittifaq
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Khaleej | Liga | Al Ittifaq | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.29 | 3.04 | • 3.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 59% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 57% | • 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 23% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 81% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Khaleej 1 - 0 - 0 Al Ittifaq. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq?
The Professional League match finished Al Khaleej 0:5 Al Ittifaq. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq?
Al Khaleej score 1.68 goals per game on average and Al Ittifaq 1.42. The Professional League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Al Khaleej's matches and 55% of Al Ittifaq's.
What form are Al Khaleej and Al Ittifaq in?
Over the last 5 games Al Khaleej have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Ittifaq 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Khaleej vs Al Ittifaq: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


