Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Al Masry vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Al Masry crest
Al Masry
3 : 2half-time 2:1
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra
130%(2.15)
X25%(3.00)
245%(3.20)

As the league leader, Ceramica Cleopatra displays superior away form with a 57% win rate and an impressive 71% clean sheet record on the road. Al Masry, despite a decent home showing (50% wins), is currently in a slump with only one victory in their last five matches. The key factor is the visitors' defense, conceding an average of just 0.29 goals per away match—a massive advantage over the hosts, who concede 1.17 goals at home. Ceramica Cleopatra also controls possession better (60% vs 56%) and has higher defensive efficiency. Although the hosts hold the edge in xG (1.36 vs 1.05), the disparity in defensive quality and overall class favors the visitors. A victory for the leader is predicted, though the hosts could pose threats, suggesting a moderate probability for the outcome.

Al Masry vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Masry played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 28 January 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Al Masry: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Masry scores 1.50 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.43 and concedes 0.43. League average: 1.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Masry 42%, Ceramica Cleopatra 21%. Over 2.5: Al Masry 58%, Ceramica Cleopatra 21%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Al Masry has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.19. Al Masry: 10.8 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.4.

Match halves

Al Masry: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.17. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Al Masry: 61-75 (5 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 1.97 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

As the league leader, Ceramica Cleopatra displays superior away form with a 57% win rate and an impressive 71% clean sheet record on the road. Al Masry, despite a decent home showing (50% wins), is currently in a slump with only one victory in their last five matches. The key factor is the visitors' defense, conceding an average of just 0.29 goals per away match—a massive advantage over the hosts, who concede 1.17 goals at home. Ceramica Cleopatra also controls possession better (60% vs 56%) and has higher defensive efficiency. Although the hosts hold the edge in xG (1.36 vs 1.05), the disparity in defensive quality and overall class favors the visitors. A victory for the leader is predicted, though the hosts could pose threats, suggesting a moderate probability for the outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
10Shots11
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3Shots on target4
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.03xG1.23
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
2Corners5
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
25Dangerous attacks35
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
11Fouls17
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3Cards2
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.5Goals scored / match1.43
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0.92Goals conceded / match0.43
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
52%Average possession60%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3.75Shots on target / match3.93
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.75Shots per match10.36
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3.75Shots on target3.93
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
14%Shot conversion13.8%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
52%Possession60%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.22xG for1.19
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.27xG against1.27
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Al Masry: Efficient finishingCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Al Masry · 3 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Al Masry
DLWDD
Season result split
42% W42% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Ceramica Cleopatra
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W14% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-2
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Masry is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Al Masry · 1.43 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Ceramica Cleopatra is 114% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Al Masry · 0.43 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Al Masry scoring profile: mixed

Al Masry scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 64% (9 of 14 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Al Masry keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

18Goals scored (season)20
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
11Goals conceded (season)6
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
2.42Average goals in match1.86
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals scored (last 5)10
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal79%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
50%2 goals50%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
25%3 goals14%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
8%4 goals0%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal36%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
25%2 goals7%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
17%3 goals0%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

21%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 14 matches
44%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time7%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
25%Scored in both halves21%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
20%BTTS - last 540%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Al Masry · 1.43 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Al Masry - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.43
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.64
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
67%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
67%No goal before half-time71%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)2.21
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)1
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.21
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.21
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
58%Clean sheet after half-time86%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra
42%No goal after half-time29%
Al MasryCeramica Cleopatra

Al Masry - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
15
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

64% W29% D7% L
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding245%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Masry - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.603.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Masry
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
3
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Masry

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al MasryLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 2.421.97 1.86
Both teams scored 42%44% 21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%35% 21%
Clean sheets 50%37% 64%
Goal before half-time 58%56% 43%
Goal after half-time 75%67% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.97
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardKarim Walid Nedved
  2. Ceramica CleopatraGoalIslam IssaAssist: Fagrie Lakay
  3. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Abdallah AliOff: Amr Al Sulaya
  4. Al MasryGoalKarim BamboAssist: Ahmed Ashraf
  5. Al MasryGoalMounder TemineAssist: Mahmoud Hamada
  6. Al MasrySubstitutionOn: Ameed SawaftaOff: Mahmoud Hamada
  7. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardMohamed Abdallah Ali
  8. Al MasryGoalHassan Hassan AliAssist: Ameed Sawafta
  9. Al MasryYellow cardHassan Hassan Ali
  10. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ayman SaadOff: Sodiq Ougola
  11. Al MasrySubstitutionOn: Mohamed El ShamyOff: Karim Bambo
  12. Al MasrySubstitutionOn: Oussama ZemraouiOff: Mounder Temine
  13. Al MasryYellow cardKhaled Sobhy
  14. Ceramica CleopatraGoalFreddy KouablanAssist: Ahmed Belhadji
  15. Al MasryYellow cardAmeed Sawafta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mohamed MaaroufMatches officiated: 18
3.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins17%Draws33%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Al Masry vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Al Masry 3:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Masry vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Al Masry score 1.50 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.43. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Al Masry's matches and 21% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Al Masry and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Al Masry have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Masry vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.