Al Najma vs Al Hazm: match statistics
Al Najma vs Al Hazm: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Najma play Al Hazm in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 18:15. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Al Najma: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Najma scores 0.94 and concedes 2.24 goals per match. Al Hazm scores 1.12 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Najma 65%, Al Hazm 59%. Over 2.5: Al Najma 68%, Al Hazm 59%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Al Hazm has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.06. Al Najma: 9.2 shots per match, Al Hazm: 11.8.
Match halves
Al Najma: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.56. Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Al Najma: 46-60 (11 goals). Al Hazm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Al Najma has clear defensive issues: only 2 wins this season against 23 losses and a goal record of 29-72; at home they concede an average of 2.27 goals per game and have kept zero clean sheets (0%). Al Hazm has a significantly better points return (10 wins, 8 draws, 13 losses, goals 34-53) and away concedes 1.53 goals on average with 4.13 SOT per match, compared to the hosts' 3.33 SOT. In the last 5 matches Najma scored 6 and conceded 11 (1-1-3), while Hazm scored 5 and conceded 6 (2-1-2), translating to 0.8 pts/match for Najma versus 1.4 pts/match for Hazm. The xG for both teams is almost identical (1.17 for Najma vs 1.18 for Hazm), but the hosts allow higher xG against (1.77 vs 1.51), so the quality of chances created for the opponent favors the visitors. Based on the hosts' poorer defense and the visitors' greater stability, I expect an Al Hazm victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Najma | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hazm is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Al Najma · 1.12 goals / match - Al Hazm
Al Hazm is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.24 goals / match - Al Najma · 1.68 goals / match - Al Hazm
Al Najma scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).
Al Hazm scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Al Najma keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Najma
Over / Under — Al Hazm
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hazm is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / match - Al Najma · 1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Najma - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): -18 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Najma
Al Hazm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Najma | Liga | Al Hazm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.18 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | • 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 23% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 75% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Najma 0 - 0 - 1 Al Hazm. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
The Professional League match finished Al Najma 2:2 Al Hazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
Al Najma score 0.94 goals per game on average and Al Hazm 1.12. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Al Najma's matches and 59% of Al Hazm's.
What form are Al Najma and Al Hazm in?
Over the last 5 games Al Najma have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Hazm 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Najma vs Al Hazm?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Najma vs Al Hazm: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.