Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait: match statistics
Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Nasar played Al Kuwait in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match was played on 20 May 2026. Venue: Ali Al-Salem Al-Sabah Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Al Nasar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Al Kuwait: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Nasar scores 0.94 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Al Kuwait scores 2.75 and concedes 0.69. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Nasar 44%, Al Kuwait 63%. Over 2.5: Al Nasar 38%, Al Kuwait 63%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Al Kuwait has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.22. Al Nasar: 8.1 shots per match, Al Kuwait: 12.0.
Match halves
Al Nasar: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.44. Al Kuwait: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.13.
Goals by minute
Al Nasar: 76-90+ (6 goals). Al Kuwait: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kuwait Premier League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Kuwait is the clear favorite: the visitors have scored 39 goals this season (avg. 2.2 goals per away match) and hold a 11-3-0 record, while Al Nasar have 13 goals this season and average 0.86 goals per home match. Both teams show similar form over the last five games — each with 4 wins and 1 loss, averaging 2.4 points per match — but the visitors create more and higher-quality chances: 5.4 shots on target and 10.8 shots overall per away match with a 20% conversion rate, versus 3.57 and 9.14 for the hosts with a 9% conversion. Defensively the visitors are better on the season (0.8 goals conceded per away match versus Al Nasar’s 1.29 conceded at home), although Al Kuwait conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per match) against the hosts’ 8 conceded in their last 5 (1.6 per match). The difference in chance quality is confirmed by xG: Al Kuwait has an xG For of 1.44 versus Al Nasar’s 1.27, and Al Nasar have 57% of home matches without scoring while Al Kuwait have 0% such away games. Considering the edge in efficiency (20% vs 9%), the higher season goal tally (39 vs 13) and result stability, I tip Al Kuwait to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis supports a BTTS - Yes (75%) vs No (25%) selection, as data indicate strong scoring potential from both sides. Al Nasar averages 3.11 goals per match, Al Kuwait 2.20, with xG of 1.70 and 1.44 respectively, showing both teams generate meaningful chances. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of games for both teams: Al Nasar scored 12 and conceded 8, Al Kuwait scored 14 and conceded 10, confirming frequent give-and-take exchanges. Additionally, Al Kuwait posts a season BTTS rate of 80% (vs 56% for Al Nasar), and average shots on target of 5.44 and 5.4 with high conversion rates of 23% and 20% increase the likelihood of goals at both ends. The counterargument is that Al Nasar concedes only 0.56 goals per match on average and has a 44% clean sheet expected rate, but the offensive indicators and Al Kuwait’s historical 80% BTTS tilt the decision toward Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals derived from xG: attacking xG is 1.7 for Al Nasar and 1.44 for Al Kuwait, while xG against is 0.81 (Nasar) and 1.11 (Kuwait), yielding an expected ~1.41 goals for the home side and 1.12 for the away side (total 2.53). This season Al Nasar scores on average 3.11 goals at home, Al Kuwait 2.20 away, and the league average is 2.59 goals per match; in the last 5 matches these values are 2.4 and 2.8 goals per game respectively. Over/Under indicators support goals: Over 1.5 occurred in 78% of Nasar’s matches and in 100% of Kuwait’s, while Over 2.5 appeared in 56% and 60% season-wide and in 80% and 100% in the last 5 matches. Additionally BTTS is 56% for Nasar and 80% for Kuwait, shots on target are similar (5.44 vs 5.4) and conversion is high (23% vs 20%), which increases the probability of at least 2 goals. For these reasons the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high probability), with the 2.5 line also favored, therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Nasar led at the break in 7 of their matches so far (78%) and score an average of 1.89 goals by half-time versus 1.2 for Al Kuwait, giving them a clear first-half advantage. Over the full 90 minutes the hosts average 3.11 goals with an 89% win rate, while the visitors average 2.2 goals and a 60% win rate; additionally xG of 1.7 versus 1.44 and 13.67 shots versus 10.8 confirm Al Nasar’s creative superiority. It should be noted, however, that both teams often score — 56% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of the visitors’ matches see both teams on the scoresheet — so conceding is possible. On this basis the safest signal is the hosts leading at the break and winning the match (1/1), hence 1/1 is chosen as the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Nasar | Al Kuwait | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Kuwait is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Al Nasar · 2.6 pts / match - Al Kuwait
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Kuwait is 193% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Al Nasar · 2.75 goals / match - Al Kuwait
Al Kuwait is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Al Nasar · 0.69 goals / match - Al Kuwait
Al Nasar scores in 50% of matches (8 of 16 matches), while Al Kuwait keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
Al Kuwait scores in 100% of matches (16 of 16 matches), while Al Nasar keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Nasar
Over / Under - Al Kuwait
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Kuwait is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Al Nasar · 2.44 pts / match - Al Kuwait
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Nasar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Kuwait - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Nasar
Al Kuwait
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Nasar | Liga | Al Kuwait | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.25 | 2.64 | ▲ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 45% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 28% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 74% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al KuwaitGoalMohammad Marhoon
- Al NasarGoalFawaz Al Mbelesh
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Al Nasar 1 - 0 - 1 Al Kuwait. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait?
The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Nasar 1:1 Al Kuwait. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Nasar and Al Kuwait?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Nasar won 1, Al Kuwait won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait?
Al Nasar score 0.94 goals per game on average and Al Kuwait 2.75. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Al Nasar's matches and 63% of Al Kuwait's.
What form are Al Nasar and Al Kuwait in?
Over the last 5 games Al Nasar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Al Kuwait 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait?
The statistical background for Al Nasar vs Al Kuwait — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.